Abstract
The field of systems biology endeavors to map, study, and simulate cellular systems and their underlying mechanisms. The internal mechanisms of biological systems can be represented with networks comprising nodes and edges. Nodes denote the constituents of the biological system whereas edges indicate the relationships among them. Likewise, every layer of cellular organization can be represented by networks. Multilayered networks capture interactions between various network types, such as transcriptional regulatory networks, protein–protein interaction networks, and metabolic networks from the same biological system. This property makes multilayered networks representative of the system while its internal mechanisms are investigated. However, there are not many multilayered networks containing integrated data for nonmodel organisms including the bacterial pathogens Salmonella. Here, we outline the steps to create such an integrated network database, through the example of SalmoNet, the first integrated multilayered data resource for multiple strains belonging to distinct Salmonella serovars.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Majowicz SE, Musto J, Scallan E et al (2010) The global burden of nontyphoidal salmonella gastroenteritis. Clin Infect Dis 50:882–889. https://doi.org/10.1086/650733
Guirguis GF, Patel K, Gittens-Williams L et al (2017) Salmonella enterica serotype typhi bacteremia complicating pregnancy in the third trimester. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol 2017:4018096. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4018096
Mohanty S, Gaind R, Paglietti B et al (2010) Bacteraemia with pleural effusions complicating typhoid fever caused by high-level ciprofloxacin-resistant salmonella enterica serotype Typhi. Ann Trop Paediatr 30:233–240. https://doi.org/10.1179/146532810X12786388978760
MĂ©tris A, Sudhakar P, Fazekas D et al (2017) SalmoNet, an integrated network of ten salmonella enterica strains reveals common and distinct pathways to host adaptation. NPJ Syst Biol Appl 3:31. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41540-017-0034-z
Chen H, Sharp BM (2004) Content-rich biological network constructed by mining PubMed abstracts. BMC Bioinformatics 5:147. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-5-147
Hoffmann R, Valencia A (2004) A gene network for navigating the literature. Nat Genet 36:664. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng0704-664
Kerrien S, Aranda B, Breuza L et al (2012) The IntAct molecular interaction database in 2012. Nucleic Acids Res 40:D841–D846. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr1088
Mosca R, Céol A, Aloy P (2013) Interactome3D: adding structural details to protein networks. Nat Methods 10:47–53. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2289
Kreimer A, Borenstein E, Gophna U, Ruppin E (2008) The evolution of modularity in bacterial metabolic networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:6976–6981. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0712149105
Thiele I, Hyduke DR, Steeb B et al (2011) A community effort towards a knowledge-base and mathematical model of the human pathogen salmonella Typhimurium LT2. BMC Syst Biol 5:8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-5-8
Chelliah V, Juty N, Ajmera I et al (2015) BioModels: ten-year anniversary. Nucleic Acids Res 43:D542–D548. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku1181
O’Brien KP, Remm M, Sonnhammer ELL (2005) Inparanoid: a comprehensive database of eukaryotic orthologs. Nucleic Acids Res 33:D476–D480. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gki107
Nichio BTL, Marchaukoski JN, Raittz RT (2017) New tools in orthology analysis: a brief review of promising perspectives. Front Genet 8:165. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2017.00165
Yu H, Luscombe NM, Lu HX et al (2004) Annotation transfer between genomes: protein-protein interologs and protein-DNA regulogs. Genome Res 14:1107–1118. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.1774904
Kiliç S, White ER, Sagitova DM et al (2014) CollecTF: a database of experimentally validated transcription factor-binding sites in bacteria. Nucleic Acids Res 42:D156–D160. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt1123
Gama-Castro S, Salgado H, Santos-Zavaleta A et al (2016) RegulonDB version 9.0: high-level integration of gene regulation, coexpression, motif clustering and beyond. Nucleic Acids Res 44:D133–D143. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1156
Grote A, Klein J, Retter I et al (2009) PRODORIC (release 2009): a database and tool platform for the analysis of gene regulation in prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 37:D61–D65. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn837
Bailey TL, Boden M, Buske FA et al (2009) MEME SUITE: tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res 37:W202–W208. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp335
Medina-Rivera A, Defrance M, Sand O et al (2015) RSAT 2015: regulatory sequence analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 43:W50–W56. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv362
Hertz GZ, Stormo GD (1999) Identifying DNA and protein patterns with statistically significant alignments of multiple sequences. Bioinformatics 15:563–577
Medina-Rivera A, Abreu-Goodger C, Thomas-Chollier M et al (2011) Theoretical and empirical quality assessment of transcription factor-binding motifs. Nucleic Acids Res 39:808–824. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkq710
Haycocks JRJ, Grainger DC (2016) Unusually situated binding sites for bacterial transcription factors can have hidden functionality. PLoS One 11:e0157016. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157016
Turatsinze J-V, Thomas-Chollier M, Defrance M, van Helden J (2008) Using RSAT to scan genome sequences for transcription factor binding sites and cis-regulatory modules. Nat Protoc 3:1578–1588. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2008.97
Nelson AC, Wardle FC (2013) Conserved non-coding elements and cis regulation: actions speak louder than words. Development 140:1385–1395. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.084459
Sierro N, Makita Y, de Hoon M, Nakai K (2008) DBTBS: a database of transcriptional regulation in Bacillus subtilis containing upstream intergenic conservation information. Nucleic Acids Res 36:D93–D96. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm910
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge all the contributors of the SalmoNet resource as well as the helpful discussions from the members and visitors of the Baranyi, Korcsmaros, and Kingsley groups. This work was supported by a fellowship to T.K. in computational biology at the Earlham Institute (Norwich, UK) in partnership with the Quadram Institute (Norwich, UK), and strategically supported by the Biotechnological and Biosciences Research Council, UK grants (BB/J004529/1, BB/P016774/1, and BB/CSP17270/1). This work was also supported by the BBSRC Norwich Research Park Biosciences Doctoral Training Partnership grant number BB/M011216/1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Olbei, M., Kingsley, R.A., Korcsmaros, T., Sudhakar, P. (2019). Network Biology Approaches to Identify Molecular and Systems-Level Differences Between Salmonella Pathovars. In: Bridier, A. (eds) Foodborne Bacterial Pathogens. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1918. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9000-9_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9000-9_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-8999-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-9000-9
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols