Advertisement

Ethnobotany and Ethnoecology Applied to Historical Ecology

  • Mariana Franco CassinoEmail author
  • Rubana Palhares Alves
  • Carolina Levis
  • Jennifer Watling
  • André Braga Junqueira
  • Myrtle P. Shock
  • Maria Julia Ferreira
  • Victor Lery Caetano Andrade
  • Laura P. Furquim
  • Sara Deambrozi Coelho
  • Eduardo Kazuo Tamanaha
  • Eduardo Góes Neves
  • Charles R. Clement
Protocol
Part of the Springer Protocols Handbooks book series (SPH)

Abstract

In this chapter, the reader will find guidelines and suggestions for the application of ethnobotanical and ethnoecological methods in archaeological sites and their surroundings, aiming to establish a closer dialogue between ethnobiology and archaeology for understanding the human history of past and present landscapes. The goal of such methodological proposals is to document the knowledge and practices of human populations that live on and around archaeological sites concerning the vegetation of these areas. The methods presented here can shed light on specific questions about the relationships between past human populations and their plant resources (e.g., practices of use, management, and domestication), helping to understand how people transformed the landscape and how the legacies of such relationships are visible in the present. This chapter is collectively written by ethnobiologists, botanists, ecologists, and archaeologists from several institutions working in the Amazon basin. Thus, examples presented here come mainly from research conducted in this region.

Key words

Archaeological sites Useful plants Domesticated landscapes Landscape transformations 

References

  1. 1.
    Ellis EC, Kaplan JO, Fuller DQ, Vavrus S, Klein Goldewijk K, Verburg PH (2013) Used planet: a global history. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110(20):7978–7985.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1217241110CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Clement CR (1999) 1492 and the loss of Amazonian crop genetic resources. I. The relation between domestication and human population decline. Econ Bot 53(2):188–202.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02866498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Levis C, Flores BM, Moreira PA, Luize BG, Alves RP, Franco-Moraes J, Lins J, Konings E, Peña-Claros M, Bongers F, Costa FRC, Clement CR (2018) How people domesticated Amazonian forests. Front Ecol Evol 5:171.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2017.00171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Albuquerque UP, Gonçalves PHS, Ferreira Júnior WS, Chaves LS, Oliveira RCS, Silva TLL, Santos GC, Araújo EL (2018) Humans as niche constructors: revisiting the concept of chronic anthropogenic disturbances in ecology. Perspect Ecol Conserv 16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2017.08.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boivin NL, Zeder MA, Fuller DQ, Crowther A, Larson G, Erlandson JM, Denham T, Petraglia MD (2016) Ecological consequences of human niche construction: examining long-term anthropogenic shaping of global species distributions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113(23):6388–6396.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1525200113CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Balée W, Erickson CL (2006) Time, complexity, and historical ecology. In: Balée W, Erickson CL (eds) Time and complexity in historical ecology: studies in the Neotropical lowlands. Colombia University Press, New York, pp 1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Crumley CL (2007) Historical ecology: integrated thinking at multiple temporal and spatial scales. In: Hornborg A, Crumley CL (eds) The world system and the earth system: global socioenvironmental change and sustainability since the neolithic. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CA, pp 15–28Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Balée W (1998) Historical ecology: premises and postulates. In: Balée W (ed) Advances in historical ecology. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 13–29Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Balée W (2006) The research program of historical ecology. Ann Rev Anthropol 35:75–98.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Newell B, Crumley CL, Hassan N, Lambin EF, Pahl-Wostl C, Underdal A, Wasson R (2005) A conceptual template for integrative human–environment research. Glob Environ Chang 15(4):299–307.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.06.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Armstrong CG, Shoemaker AC, McKechnie I, Ekblom A, Szabo P, Lane PJ, McAlvay AC, Boles OJ, Walshaw S, Petek N, Gibbons KS, Quintana Morales E, Anderson EN, Ibragimow A, Podruczny G, Vamosi JC, Marks-Block T, LeCompte JK, Awasis S, Nabess C, Sinclair P, Crumley CL (2017) Anthropological contributions to historical ecology: 50 questions, infinite prospects. PLoS One 12(2):e0171883.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171883CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Piperno DR, McMichael CH, Bush MB (2015) Amazonia and the Anthropocene: what was the spatial extent and intensity of human landscape modification in the Amazon Basin at the end of prehistory? The Holocene 25(10):1588–1597.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683615588374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Levis C, Costa FRC, Bongers F, Peña-Claros M, Clement CR, Junqueira AB, Neves EG, Tamanaha EK, Figueiredo FOG, Salomão RP, Castilho CV, Magnusson WE, Phillips OL, Guevara JE, Sabatier D, Molino J-F, López DC, Mendoza AM, Pitman NCA, Duque A, Vargas PN, Zartman CE, Vasquez R, Andrade A, Camargo JL, Feldpausch TR, Laurance SGW, Laurance WF, Killeen TJ, Nascimento HEM, Montero JC, Mostacedo B, Amaral IL, Guimaraes Vieira IC, Brienen R, Castellanos H, Terborgh J, Vargas Carim MJ, Guimarães JRS, Coelho LS, Matos FDA, Wittmann F, Mogollón HF, Damasco G, Dávila N, García-Villacorta R, Honorio Coronado EN, Emilio T, Lima Filho DDA, Schietti J, Souza P, Targhetta N, Comiskey JA, Marimon BS, Marimon B-H Jr, Neill D, Alonso A, Arroyo L, Carvalho FA, Souza FC, Dallmeier F, Pansonato MP, Duivenvoorden JF, PVA F, Stevenson Diaz PR, Araujo-Murakami A, GA AC, Baraloto C, Amaral DD, Engel J, Henkel TW, Maas P, Petronelli P, JDC R, Stropp J, Daly D, Gribel R, Paredes MR, Silveira M, Thomas-Caesar R, Baker TR, Silva NF, Ferreira LV, Peres CA, Silman MR, Cerón C, Valverde FC, Di Fiore A, Jimenez EM, Peñuela Mora MC, Toledo M, Barbosa EM, LCM B, Arboleda NC, Farias ES, Fuentes A, Guillaumet J-L, Jorgensen PM, Malhi Y, IPA M, Phillips JF, Prieto A, Rudas A, Ruschell AR, Silva N, von Hildebrand P, Vos VA, Zent EL, Zent S, BBL C, Nascimento MT, Oliveira AA, Ramirez-Angulo H, Ramos JF, Rivas-Torres G, Schöngart J, Sierra R, Tirado M, van der Heijden G, Torre EV, Wang O, Young KR, Baider C, Cano A, Farfan-Rios W, Ferreira C, Hoffman B, Mendoza C, Mesones I, Torres-Lezama A, MNU M, van Andel TR, Villarroel D, Zagt R, Alexiades MN, Balslev H, Garcia-Cabrera K, Gonzales T, Hernandez L, Huamantupa-Chuquimaco I, Manzatto AG, Milliken W, Palacios Cuenca W, Pansini S, Pauletto D, Ramirez Arevalo F, Costa Reis NF, Sampaio AF, Urrego Giraldo LE, EHV S, Gamarra LV, CIA V, ter Steege H (2017) Persistent effects of pre-Columbian plant domestication on Amazonian forest composition. Science 355(6328):925–931.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal0157CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Roberts P, Hunt C, Arroyo-Kalin M, Evans D, Boivin N (2017) The deep human prehistory of global tropical forests and its relevance for modern conservation. Nat Plants 3(8):17093.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nplants.2017.93CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pearsall DM (2015) Paleoethnobotany: a handbook of procedures. 3rd edn. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pohl MD, Pope KO, Jones JG, Jacob JS, Piperno DR, de France SD, Lentz DL, Gifford JA, Danforth ME, Josserand JK (1996) Early agriculture in the Maya lowlands. Lat Am Antiq 7(4):355–372.  https://doi.org/10.2307/972264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Perry L (2005) Reassessing the traditional interpretation of “manioc” artifacts in the Orinoco Valley of Venezuela. Lat Am Antiq 16(4):409–426.  https://doi.org/10.2307/30042507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dickau R (2010) Microbotanical and macrobotanical evidence of plant use and the transition to agriculture in Panama. In: VanDerwarker AM, Peres TM (eds) Integrating zooarchaeology and paleoethnobotany: a consideration of issues, methods, and cases. Springer, New York, NY, pp 99–134.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0935-0_6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dickau R, Bruno MC, Iriarte J, Prümers H, Jaimes Betancourt C, Holst I, Mayle FE (2012) Diversity of cultivars and other plant resources used at habitation sites in the Llanos de Mojos, Beni, Bolivia: evidence from macrobotanical remains, starch grains, and phytoliths. J Arch Sci 39(2):357–370.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2011.09.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mayle FE, Iriarte J (2014) Integrated palaeoecology and archaeology – a powerful approach for understanding pre-Columbian Amazonia. J Arch Sci 51(1):54–64.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2012.08.038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hastorf C (1998) The cultural life of early domestic plant use. Antiquity 72(278):773–782.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00087366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stahl PW (2015) Interpreting interfluvial landscape transformations in the pre-Columbian Amazon. The Holocene 25(10):1598–1603.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683615588372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Graham E (2006) A neotropical framework for terra preta. In: Balée W, Erickson CL (eds) Time and complexity in historical ecology: studies in the neotropical lowlands. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 57–86Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Balée W (2013) Cultural forests of the Amazon: a historical ecology of people and their landscapes. The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, ALGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Posey DA (1985) Indigenous management of tropical forest ecosystems: the case of the Kayapo Indians of the Brazilian Amazon. Agrofor Syst 3(2):139–158.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Smith BD (2011) General patterns of niche construction and the management of 'wild' plant and animal resources by small-scale pre-industrial societies. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 366(1566):836–848.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Smith BD (2012) A cultural niche construction theory of initial domestication. Biol Theory 6(3):260–271.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-012-0028-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Abraão MB, Shepard GH Jr, Nelson BW Jr, Baniwa JC, Andrello G, Yu DW (2010) Baniwa vegetation classification in the white-sand Campinarana habitat of the northwest Amazon, Brazil. In: Johnson LM, Hunn ES (eds) Landscape ethnoecology: concepts of biotic and physical space. Berghahn Books, New York, pp 83–115Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Balée W (2008) New data for existence of plantain cultivation in coastal Brazil before 1492. In: Wright JB (ed) Encounter, engagement, and exchange: how native populations of the Americas transformed the world. Papers of the fifty-third annual meeting of the seminar on the the acquisition of Latin American library materials. Latin American Library, New Orleans, LA, pp 13–36Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Albuquerque UP, Cunha LVFC, Lucena RFP, Alves RRN (2014) Methods and techniques in ethnobiology and ethnoecology, vol 1. Springer, New York.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8636-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Machado JS (2009) Arqueologia e história nas construções de continuidade na Amazônia. Bol Mus Para Emílio Goeldi Cien Hum 4(1):57–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    LdMR B (2007) Variabilidade tecnológica nos sítios líticos da região do Lajeado, médio rio Tocantins. Rev Mus Arqueo Etnol 17. (supl. 4:1–215Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Heckenberger MJ (2005) The ecology of power: culture, place, and personhood in the southern Amazon, AD 1000–2000. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Fraser JA, Teixeira WG, Falcão NPS, Woods WI, Lehmann J, Junqueira AB (2011) Anthropogenic soils in the Central Amazon: from categories to a continuum. Area 43(3):264–273.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.00999.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Schmidt MJ, Rapp Py-Daniel A, de Paula Moraes C, RBM V, Caromano CF, Texeira WG, Barbosa CA, Fonseca JA, Magalhães MP, Silva do Carmo Santos D, da Silva e Silva R, Guapindaia VL, Moraes B, Lima HP, Neves EG, Heckenberger MJ (2014) Dark earths and the human built landscape in Amazonia: a widespread pattern of anthrosol formation. J Arch Sci 42:152–165.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2013.11.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bailey KD (1994) Methods of social research. 4th edn. Simon and Schuster, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Murrieta RSS, WinklerPrins AMGA (2003) Flowers of water: homegardens and gender roles in a riverine caboclo community in the lower Amazon, Brazil. Cult Agric 25(1):35–47.  https://doi.org/10.1525/cag.2003.25.1.35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Junqueira AB, Kawa NC, Fraser JA, Clement CR (2010) Explorando a relação entre agrobiodiversidade e solos antrópicos no médio Rio Madeira, Amazonas, Brasil. In: Agrobiodiversidade no Brasil: Experiências e caminhos da pesquisa. Série Estudos & Avanços, 6. Ming, Lin Chau; Amorozo, Maria Christina M.; Kffuri, Carolina W. (Orgs). NUPEEA, Recife, pp 137–160Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Albuquerque UP, Lucena RFP, Lins Neto EMF (2014)) Selection of research participants. In: Albuquerque UP, Cunha LVFC, Lucena RFP, Alves RRN (eds) Methods and techniques in ethnobiology and ethnoecology. Springer protocols. Springer, New York, pp 1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8636-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Quinlan M (2005) Considerations for collecting freelists in the field: examples from ethobotany. Field Meth 17(3):219–234.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05277460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Albuquerque UP, Ramos MA, Lucena RFP, Alencar NL (2014) Methods and techniques used to collect ethnobiological data. In: Albuquerque UP, Cunha LVFC, Lucena RFP, Alves RRN (eds) Methods and techniques in ethnobiology and ethnoecology, vol 1. Springer protocols. Springer, New York, pp 15–38.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8636-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Balée W, Nolan J (2015) Freelisting as a tool for assessing cognitive realities of landscape transformation: a case study from Amazonia. In: Isendahl C, Stump D (eds) The Oxford handbook of historical ecology and applied archaeology. Oxford handbooks online. Oxford University Press, Oxford.  https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199672691.013.20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Cabral de Oliveira J (2016) Mundos de roças e florestas. Bol Mus Para Emílio Goeldi Cien Hum 11(1):115–131.  https://doi.org/10.1590/1981.81222016000100007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Albert B, Milliken W (2009) Urihi A: a terra-floresta Yanomami. Instituto Socioambiental, Institut de recherche pour le développement, São Paulo, SPGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Junqueira AB, Shepard GH Jr, Clement CR (2010) Secondary forests on anthropogenic soils in Brazilian Amazonia conserve agrobiodiversity. Biodivers Conserv 19(7):1933–1961.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-010-9813-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Watling J, Iriarte J, Mayle FE, Schaan D, Pessenda LCR, Loader NJ, Street-Perrott FA, Dickau RE, Damasceno A, Ranzi A (2017) Impact of pre-Columbian “geoglyph” builders on Amazonian forests. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114(8):1868–1873.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1614359114CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Thayn JB, Price KP, Woods WI (2011) Locating Amazonian Dark Earths (ADE) using vegetation vigour as a surrogate for soil type. Int J Remote Sens 32(21):6713–6729.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2010.512941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    McMichael CH, Palace MW, Bush MB, Braswell B, Hagen S, Neves EG, Silman MR, Tamanaha EK, Czarnecki C (2014) Predicting pre-Columbian anthropogenic soils in Amazonia. Phil R Soc B Biol Sci 281(1777):20132475.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.2475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Söderström M, Eriksson J, Isendahl C, Schaan DP, Stenborg P, Rebellato L, Piikki K (2016) Sensor mapping of Amazonian Dark Earths in deforested croplands. Geoderma 281:58–68.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.06.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Palace MW, McMichael CHN, Braswell BH, Hagen SC, Bush MB, Neves EG, Tamanaha EK, Herrick C, Frolking S (2017) Ancient Amazonian populations left lasting impacts on forest structure. Ecosphere 8(12):e02035.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Balée W (1989) The culture of Amazonian forests. In: Posey DA, Balée W (eds) Resource management in Amazonia: indigenous and folk strategies, vol 7, advances in economic botany. The New York botanical garden. Bronx, New York, pp 1–21Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Clement CR, McCann JM, Smith NJH (2003) Agrobiodiversity in Amazonia and its relationship with dark earths. In: Lehmann J, Kern DC, Glaser B, Woods W (eds) Amazonian dark earths: Origin, properties, management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 159–178Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Shepard GH Jr, Ramirez H (2011) “Made in Brazil”: human dispersal of the Brazil Nut (Bertholletia excelsa, Lecythidaceae) in ancient Amazonia. Econ Bot 65(1):44–65.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-011-9151-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Junqueira AB, Shepard GH Jr, Clement CR (2011) Secondary forests on anthropogenic soils of the middle Madeira River: valuation, local knowledge, and landscape domestication in Brazilian Amazonia. Econ Bot 65(1):85–99.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-010-9138-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Dufrene M, Legendre P (1997) Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol Monogr 67(3):345–366.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2963459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Prance GT, Baleé W, Boom BM, Carneiro RL (1987) Quantitative ethnobotany and the case for conservation in Amazonia. Conserv Biol 1(4):296–310 doi:0.1111/j.1523-1739.1987.tb00050.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    DeWalt SJ, Geneviève B, Chávez de Michel LR, Celin Q (1999) Ethnobotany of the Tacana: quantitative inventories of two permanent plots of northwestern Bolivia. Econ Bot 53(3):237–260.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02866635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Macía MJ, Armesilla PJ, Cámara-Leret R, Paniagua-Zambrana N, Villalba S, Balslev H, Pardo-de-Santayana M (2011) Palm uses in northwestern South America: a quantitative review. Bot Rev 77(4):462–570.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12229-011-9086-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    de la Torre L, Cerón CE, Balslev H, Borchsenius F (2012) A biodiversity informatics approach to ethnobotany: meta-analysis of plant use patterns in Ecuador. Ecol Soc 17(1):1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Machado Mello AJ, Peroni N (2015) Cultural landscapes of the Araucaria forests in the northern plateau of Santa Catarina, Brazil. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 11(1):51.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-015-0039-xCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Clement CR, Cristo-Araújo M, Coppens d’Eeckenbrugge G, Alves Pereira A, Picanço-Rodrigues D (2010) Origin and domestication of native Amazonian crops. Diversity 2(1):72–106.  https://doi.org/10.3390/d2010072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Balée W (1994) Footprints of the forest: Ka’apor ethnobotany – the historical ecology of plant utilization by an Amazonian people. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Neves EG (2013) Was agriculture a key productive activity in pre-colonial Amazonia? The stable productive basis for social equality in the Central Amazon. In: Brondízio ES, Moran EF (eds) Human-environment interactions: current and future directions. Human-Environment Interactions. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 371–388.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4780-7_16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Santos GMd (2016) Plantas e parentelas: notas sobre a história da agricultura no médio Purus. In: GMd S, Aparicio M (eds) Redes Arawa: ensaios de etnologia do médio Purus. EDUA, Manaus, pp 19–40Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Denevan WM (1992) Stone vs. metal axes: the ambiguity of shifting cultivation in prehistoric Amazonia. J Steward Anthropol 20(1–2):153–165Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Silva MAd (2015) Memórias e histórias no sudoeste amazônico: o Museu Regional de Arqueologia de Rondônia. Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SPGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Medeiros MFT, Silva TC, Sousa RS, Silva RRV (2014) Oral history in ethnobiology and ethnoecology. In: Albuquerque UP, Cunha LVC, Lucena RFP, Alves RRN (eds) Methods and techniques in ethnobiology and ethnoecology, vol 1. Springer Protocols. Springer, New York, pp 59–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Thompson P (2017) The voice of the past: oral history, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Meihy JCSB (2008) Palavras aos jovens oralistas: entrevistas em história oral. Oralidades 2(3):141–150Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Fausto C (2008) Too many owners: mastery and ownership in Amazonia. Mana 4(2):329–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    ISE (2006) International Society of Ethnobiology code of ethics (with 2008 additions). International Society of Ethnobiology, Gainesville, FL http://ethnobiology.net/code-of-ethics/Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Silva CNd, Verbicaro C (2016) O mapeamento participativo como metodologia de análise do território. Scientia Plena 12(6):1–12.  https://doi.org/10.14808/sci.plena.2016.069934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Gilmore MP, Young JC (2012) The use of participatory mapping in ethnobiological research, biocultural conservation, and community empowerment: a case study from the Peruvian Amazon. J Ethnobiol 32(1):6–29.  https://doi.org/10.2993/0278-0771-32.1.6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Verbicaro CC, Nunes CS (2015) Percepção da distribuição espacial das palmeiras de açaí e miriti ao longo de 20 anos na várzea da Amazônia paraense. In: A diversidade da geografia brasileira: escalas e dimensões da análise e da ação. Associação Nacional de Pós-graduação e Pesquisa em Geografia, Presidente Prudente, São Paulo, pp 5175–5186Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Silva TC, Ferreira WS Jr, Medeiros PM, Araújo TAS, Albuquerque UP (2014) Participatory mapping of the terrestrial landscape in Brazil: experiences and potentialities. In: Albuquerque UP, Cunha LVFC, Lucena RFP, Alves RRN (eds) Methods and techniques in ethnobiology and ethnoecology, vol 1. Springer protocols. Springer, New York, pp 239–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Araújo EL, Ferraz EMN (2014) Analysis of vegetation in ethnobotanical studies. In: Albuquerque UP, Cunha LVFC, Lucena RFP, Alves RRN (eds) Methods and techniques in ethnobiology and ethnoecology, vol 1. Springer protocols. Humana, New York, pp 141–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Levis C, Souza PF, Schietti J, Emilio T, Pinto JLPV, Clement CR, Costa FRC (2012) Historical human footprint on modern tree species composition in the Purus-Madeira interfluve, central Amazonia. PLoS One 7(11):e48559.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048559CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Phillips OL, Martínez RV, Vargas PN, Monteagudo AL, Zans M-EC, Sánchez WG, Cruz AP, Timaná M, Yli-Halla M, Rose S (2003) Efficient plot-based floristic assessment of tropical forests. J Trop Ecol 19(6):629–645.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467403006035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Lins J, Lima HP, Baccaro FB, Kinupp VF, Shepard GH Jr, Clement CR (2015) Pre-columbian floristic legacies in modern homegardens of central amazonia. PLoS One 10(6):e0127067.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127067CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Smith N (2015) Palms and people in the Amazon. Geobotany studies – basics, methods and case studies. Springer, Heidelberg.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05509-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Prado HM, Murrieta RSS (2015) A etnoecologia em perspectiva: origens, interfaces e correntes atuais de um campo em ascenção. AMB Soc 18(4):139–160.  https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4422ASOC986V1842015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Clement CR, Denevan WM, Heckenberger MJ, Junqueira AB, Neves EG, Teixeira WG, Woods WI (2015) The domestication of Amazonia before European conquest. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 282(1812):20150813.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.0813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Watling J, Iriarte J, Mayle FE, Schaan DP, Pessenda LCR, Loader NJ, Street-Perrott FA, Dickau RE, Damasceno A, Ranzi A (2017) Reply to Piperno et al.: it is too soon to argue for localized, short-term human impacts in interfluvial Amazonia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114(21):E4120–E4121.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1705697114CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Hayashida FM (2005) Archaeology, ecological history, and conservation. Ann Rev Anthropol 34(1):43–65.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.34.081804.120515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Junqueira AB, Levis C, Bongers F, Peña-Claros M, Clement CR, Costa F, ter Steege H (2017) Response to comment on “persistent effects of pre-Columbian plant domestication on Amazonian forest composition”. Science 358(6361):eaan8837.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan8837CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Crumley C (2015) New paths into the Anthropocene: applying historical ecologies to the human future. In: Isendahl C, Stump D, Crumley C (eds) The Oxford handbook of historical ecology and applied archaeology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.  https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199672691.013.3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Junqueira AB, Clement CR (2012) Reply to Barlow et al. (2011): towards an integrated understanding of the pre-conquest human footprint in Amazonia. Biol Conserv 152:291–292.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.03.025CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mariana Franco Cassino
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rubana Palhares Alves
    • 2
  • Carolina Levis
    • 2
  • Jennifer Watling
    • 3
  • André Braga Junqueira
    • 4
  • Myrtle P. Shock
    • 5
  • Maria Julia Ferreira
    • 6
  • Victor Lery Caetano Andrade
    • 7
  • Laura P. Furquim
    • 3
  • Sara Deambrozi Coelho
    • 2
  • Eduardo Kazuo Tamanaha
    • 1
  • Eduardo Góes Neves
    • 3
  • Charles R. Clement
    • 8
  1. 1.Laboratório de ArqueologiaInstituto de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Mamirauá (IDSM)TeféBrazil
  2. 2.Programa de Pós Graduação em EcologiaInstituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)ManausBrazil
  3. 3.Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology (MAE)University of São Paulo (USP)São PauloBrazil
  4. 4.International Institute for SustainabilityRio de JaneiroBrazil
  5. 5.Programa de Antropologia e ArqueologiaUniversidade Federal do Oeste do Pará, Santarém (UFOPA)ParáBrazil
  6. 6.Programa de Pós Graduação em BotânicaInstituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)ManausBrazil
  7. 7.Department of ArchaeologyMax Planck Institute for the Science of Human HistoryJenaGermany
  8. 8.Coordenação de Tecnologia e InovaçãoInstituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)ManausBrazil

Personalised recommendations