Advertisement

Nanotoxicity pp 313-322 | Cite as

Evaluation of Pulmonary Toxicity of Nanoparticles by Bronchoalveolar Lavage

  • Yiqun Mo
  • Yue Zhang
  • Qunwei Zhang
Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1894)

Abstract

Nanoparticles can enter the body via the lungs, the digestive tract, and the skin. The pulmonary effects of nanoparticles and the underlying mechanisms may be investigated by histopathological examination, immunostaining, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), and so on. BAL is a simple, fast, and inexpensive method that is commonly used to investigate the immune cells and acellular components in the lungs, which reflect the health state of the lungs. In this chapter, we describe the detailed procedures of performing BAL on mouse lungs. In a typical procedure, a catheter is inserted in the exposed trachea of a mouse, through which a phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) is instilled into the lungs by a syringe. BAL fluid (BALF) is collected by gently retracting the instilled solution and massaging the thoracic cavity to maximize BALF retrieval and to minimize shearing forces. The type and number of differentiated immune cells in the BALF are analyzed, and the soluble factors such as total proteins, chemokines, and cytokines in the BALF are determined by protein assay, ELISA, etc.

Key words

Nanoparticles Bronchoalveolar lavage BALF Mouse lungs Immune cells 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This work was partly supported by the NIESH/NIH (ES023693 and ES028911), KSEF-148-502-16-381, Kentucky Lung Cancer Research Program, and an Intramural Research Incentive Grants (50992) from UofL to Dr. Qunwei Zhang.

References

  1. 1.
    Van Hoecke L, Job ER, Saelens X, Roose K (2017) Bronchoalveolar lavage of murine lungs to analyze inflammatory cell infiltration. J Vis Exp 123:e55398.  https://doi.org/10.3791/55398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mo Y, Chen J, Schlueter CF, Hoyle GW (2013) Differential susceptibility of inbred mouse strains to chlorine-induced airway fibrosis. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 304(2):L92–L102.  https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.00272.2012CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mo Y, Wan R, Zhang Q (2012) Application of reverse transcription-PCR and real-time PCR in nanotoxicity research. Nanotoxicity: Method and Protocols. In the series: Methods in Molecular Biology, edited by John Walker, Springer Protocol. (www.SpringerProtocols.com). Humana Press. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-002-1; Methods Mol. Biol; 926: 99–112Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wan R, Mo Y, Zhang Z, Jiang M, Tang S, Zhang Q (2017) Cobalt nanoparticles induce lung injury, DNA damage and mutations in mice. Part Fibre Toxicol 14:38.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12989-017-0219-zCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gallagher S, Chakavarti D (2008) Immunoblot analysis. J Vis Exp 16:759.  https://doi.org/10.3791/759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mo Y, Chen J, Humphrey DM Jr, Fodah RA, Warawa JM, Hoyle GW (2015) Abnormal epithelial structure and chronic lung inflammation after repair of chlorine-induced airway injury. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 308(2):L168–L178.  https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.00226.2014CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, School of Public Health and Information SciencesUniversity of LouisvilleLouisvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations