Autophagy pp 691-701 | Cite as

Quantitative Phosphoproteomics of Selective Autophagy Receptors

  • Thomas Juretschke
  • Petra Beli
  • Ivan Dikic
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1880)


Selective autophagy enables degradation of specific cargo such as protein aggregates or organelles and thus plays an essential role in the regulation of cellular homeostasis. Cargo specificity is achieved on the level of autophagy receptors that concurrently bind the cargo and the autophagosomal membrane. Recent studies have demonstrated that selective autophagy is tightly regulated by posttranslational modifications of autophagy receptors, in particular protein phosphorylation. Phosphorylation of autophagy receptors by different kinases, including Tank-binding kinase (TBK1), can increase their affinity toward the cargo or autophagosomes and thereby regulate the specificity and activity of selective autophagy depending on the cellular condition.

Here, we report an approach for quantitative analysis of phosphorylation sites on autophagy receptors using mass spectrometry-based proteomics. In this protocol, GFP-tagged autophagy receptors are purified based on the high-affinity binding between GFP and GFP-Trap agarose. Interaction partners and background binders are subsequently removed by washes under denaturing conditions to obtain a pure fraction of the bait protein, thereby reducing the complexity of the analyzed sample. The bait protein is then digested on-bead, and peptides are analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The described approach permits systematic identification and quantification of phosphorylation sites on autophagy receptors and other autophagic components. In addition to phosphorylation, this protocol is suitable for investigating other posttranslational modifications, including protein ubiquitylation.

Key words

Autophagy receptors Selective autophagy Phosphorylation Mass spectrometry-based proteomics SILAC 



This work is supported by the German Research Foundation (Emmy Noether Program, BE 5342/1-1 and SFB 1177 on Selective Autophagy).


  1. 1.
    Levine B, Kroemer G (2008) Autophagy in the pathogenesis of disease. Cell 132:27–42. Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mizushima N, Yoshimori T, Ohsumi Y (2011) The role of Atg proteins in autophagosome formation. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 27:107–132. Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yang Z, Klionsky DJ (2010) Eaten alive: a history of macroautophagy. Nat Cell Biol 12:814–822. Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stolz A, Ernst A, Dikic I (2014) Cargo recognition and trafficking in selective autophagy. Nat Cell Biol 16:495–501. Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rogov V, Dötsch V, Johansen T et al (2014) Interactions between autophagy receptors and ubiquitin-like proteins form the molecular basis for selective autophagy. Mol Cell 53:167–178. Scholar
  6. 6.
    Behrends C, Sowa ME, Gygi SP, Harper JW (2010) Network organization of the human autophagy system. Nature 466:68–76. Scholar
  7. 7.
    Deng Z, Purtell K, Lachance V et al (2017) Autophagy receptors and neurodegenerative diseases. Trends Cell Biol 27:491. Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wild P, McEwan DG, Dikic I (2014) The LC3 interactome at a glance. J Cell Sci 127:3–9. Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wild P, Farhan H, McEwan DG et al (2011) Phosphorylation of the autophagy receptor optineurin restricts Salmonella growth. Science 333:228–233. Scholar
  10. 10.
    Richter B, Sliter DA, Herhaus L et al (2016) Phosphorylation of OPTN by TBK1 enhances its binding to Ub chains and promotes selective autophagy of damaged mitochondria. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113:4039–4044. Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rogov VV, Suzuki H, Marinković M et al (2017) Phosphorylation of the mitochondrial autophagy receptor nix enhances its interaction with LC3 proteins. Sci Rep 7:1131. Scholar
  12. 12.
    Heo J-M, Ordureau A, Paulo JA et al (2015) The PINK1-PARKIN mitochondrial Ubiquitylation pathway drives a program of OPTN/NDP52 recruitment and TBK1 activation to promote mitophagy. Mol Cell 60:7–20. Scholar
  13. 13.
    Matsumoto G, Wada K, Okuno M et al (2011) Serine 403 phosphorylation of p62/SQSTM1 regulates selective autophagic clearance of ubiquitinated proteins. Mol Cell 44:279–289. Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pilli M, Arko-Mensah J, Ponpuak M et al (2012) TBK-1 promotes autophagy-mediated antimicrobial defense by controlling autophagosome maturation. Immunity 37:223–234. Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lim J, Lachenmayer ML, Wu S et al (2015) Proteotoxic stress induces phosphorylation of p62/SQSTM1 by ULK1 to regulate selective autophagic clearance of protein aggregates. PLoS Genet 11:e1004987. Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liu Z, Chen P, Gao H et al (2014) Ubiquitylation of autophagy receptor optineurin by HACE1 activates selective autophagy for tumor suppression. Cancer Cell 26:106–120. Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cox J, Mann M (2011) Quantitative, high-resolution proteomics for data-driven systems biology. Annu Rev Biochem 80:273–299. Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bantscheff M, Lemeer S, Savitski MM, Kuster B (2012) Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: critical review update from 2007 to the present. Anal Bioanal Chem 404:939–965. Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ordureau A, Münch C, Harper JW (2015) Quantifying ubiquitin signaling. Mol Cell 58(4):660–676. Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rappsilber J, Mann M, Ishihama Y (2007) Protocol for micro-purification, enrichment, pre-fractionation and storage of peptides for proteomics using StageTips. Nat Protoc 2:1896–1906. Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ishihama Y, Rappsilber J, Andersen JS, Mann M (2002) Microcolumns with self-assembled particle frits for proteomics. J Chromatogr A 979:233–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Michalski A, Damoc E, Hauschild JP et al (2011) Mass spectrometry-based proteomics using Q Exactive, a high-performance benchtop quadrupole Orbitrap mass spectrometer. Mol Cell Proteomics 10:M111.011015. Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kelstrup CD, Young C, Lavallee R et al (2012) Optimized fast and sensitive acquisition methods for shotgun proteomics on a quadrupole orbitrap mass spectrometer. J Proteome Res 11:3487–3497. Scholar
  24. 24.
    Olsen JV, Macek B, Lange O et al (2007) Higher-energy C-trap dissociation for peptide modification analysis. Nat Methods 4:709–712. Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cox J, Mann M (2008) MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat Biotechnol 26:1367–1372. Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cox J, Neuhauser N, Michalski A et al (2011) Andromeda: a peptide search engine integrated into the MaxQuant environment. J Proteome Res 10:1794–1805. Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bendall SC, Hughes C, Stewart MH et al (2008) Prevention of amino acid conversion in SILAC experiments with embryonic stem cells. Mol Cell Proteomics 7:1587–1597. Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cox J, Matic I, Hilger M et al (2009) A practical guide to the MaxQuant computational platform for SILAC-based quantitative proteomics. Nat Protoc 4:698–705. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Molecular Biology (IMB)MainzGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Biochemistry IIGoethe University School of MedicineFrankfurtGermany
  3. 3.Buchmann Institute for Molecular Life SciencesGoethe UniversityFrankfurtGermany

Personalised recommendations