Advertisement

A Multipronged Method for Unveiling Subtle Structural–Functional Defects of Mutant Chaperone Molecules Causing Human Chaperonopathies

  • Donatella Bulone
  • Pier Luigi San Biagio
  • Tatiana Quiñones-Ruiz
  • Manuel Rosario-Alomar
  • Igor K. Lednev
  • Frank T. Robb
  • Everly Conway de Macario
  • Alberto J. L. MacarioEmail author
Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1873)

Abstract

Chaperonopathies are diseases in which abnormal chaperones play an etiopathogenic role. A chaperone is mutated or otherwise abnormal (e.g., modified by an aberrant posttranslational modification) in structure/function. To understand the pathogenic mechanisms of chaperonopathies, it is necessary to elucidate the impact of the pathogenic mutation or posttranslational modification on the chaperone molecule’s properties and functions. This impact is usually subtle because if it were more than subtle the overall effect on the cell and organism would be catastrophic, lethal. This is because most chaperones are essential for life and, if damaged in structure/function too strongly, there would be death of the cell/organism, and no phenotype, i.e., there would be no patients with chaperonopathies. Consequently, diagnostic procedures and analysis of defects of the abnormal chaperones require a multipronged method for assessing the chaperone molecule from various angles. Here, we present such a method that includes assessing the intrinsic properties and the chaperoning functions of chaperone molecules.

Keywords

Chaperonopathies Genetic chaperonopathies Mutant chaperones Subtle changes Multipronged method Molecular properties Chaperoning functions Calorimetry Heat protection Fibril dispersion 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Part of the work by PLSB and DB was carried out using instruments funded by PO. FESR 2007/2013 “Piattaforma regionale di ricerca traslazionale per la salute” 4.1.2. Asse IV. We thank Drs. A. Provenzano and F. Impallari for technical support.

Part of this work was carried out at the Biomolecular Labeling Laboratory-National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Rockville, USA. FTR, ECdeM, and AJLM thank Zvi Kelman for his hospitality and stimulating discussions.

FTR was supported by NSF USA grants EAR0747394, EAR0747412, and MCB0605301; and Air Force Office of Scientific Research under Grants AFOSR 03-S-28900; and 496 9550-10-1-0272 (IKL and FTR). IKL was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. CHE-1152752 (I.K.L.). AJLM and ECdeM were partially supported by IMET. This work was done under the agreement between IEMEST (Italy) and IMET (USA) (IMET contribution number IMET 18-003).

References

  1. 1.
    Macario AJL, Conway de Macario E (2005) Sick chaperones, cellular stress and disease. N Engl J Med 353:1489–1501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Macario AJL, Conway de Macario E (2016) The chaperoning and the immune systems with the microbiome integrate a matrix that supports health: when one of them is disturbed the others suffer and disease ensues. Life Safety Security (LiSS) 4:101–123 http://www.iemest.eu/life-safety-and-security/images/Doc/ARTICOLI/2016/macario_24/Macario04.pdfGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bouhouche A, Benomar A, Bouslam N, Chkili T, Yahyaoui M (2006a) Mutation in the epsilon subunit of the cytosolic chaperonin-containing t-complex peptide-1 (Cct5) gene causes autosomal recessive mutilating sensory neuropathy with spastic paraplegia. J Med Genet 43(5):441–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bouhouche A, Benomar A, Bouslam N, Ouazzani R, Chkili T, Yahyaoui M (2006b) Autosomal recessive mutilating sensory neuropathy with spastic paraplegia maps to chromosome 5p15.31-14.1. Eur J Hum Genet 14(2):249–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Conway de Macario E, Robb FT, Macario AJL (2017) Prokaryotic chaperonins as experimental models for elucidating structure-function abnormalities of human pathogenic mutant counterparts. Front Mol Biosci 3:84.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2016.00084 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28119916 http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmolb.2016.00084/full CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Privalov PL, Potekhin SA (1986) Scanning microcalorimetry in studying temperature-induced changes in proteins. In: Hirs CHW, Timasheff SN (eds) Enzyme structure part L. methods enzymology, vol 131. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 4–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sturtevant JM (1987) Biochemical applications of differential scanning calorimetry. Ann Rev Phys Chem 38:463–488.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pc.38.100187.002335 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Freire E (1995) Thermal denaturation methods in the study of protein folding. In: Abelson J, Simon M, Johnson M, Ackers G (eds) Methods in enzymology, Energetics of biological macromolecules, vol 259. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 144–168Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Privalov G, Kavina V, Freire E, Privalov PL (1995) Precise scanning calorimeter for studying thermal properties of biological macromolecules in dilute solution1. Anal Chem 232:79–852.  https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.1995.9957 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Freire E, Mayorga OL, Straume M (1990) Isothermal titration calorimetry. Anal Chem 62:950–959.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00217a002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Velazquez-Campoy A, Leavitt SA, Freire E (2015) Characterization of protein-protein interactions by isothermal titration calorimetry. In: Meyerkord CL, Fu H (eds) Methods in molecular biology, Protein-protein interactions: methods and applications, vol 1278, 2nd edn. Springer, New York, pp 183–204Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Loh W, Brinatti C, Tam KC (2016) Use of isothermal titration calorimetry to study surfactant aggregation in colloidal systems. BBA-Gen Subjects 1860:999–1016.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2015.10.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Min W, Angileri F, Luo H, Lauria A, Shanmugasundaram M, Almerico AM, Cappello F, Conway de Macario E, Lednev IK, Macario AJL, Robb FT (2014) A human CCT5 gene mutation causing distal neuropathy impairs hexadecamer assembly in an archaeal model. Sci Rep 4:6688.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep06688 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Luo H, Robb FT (2011) A modulator domain controlling thermal stability in the Group II chaperonins of Archaea. Arch Biochem Biophys 512:111–118.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2011.04.017 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Serpell LC (2000) Alzheimer's amyloid fibrils: structure and assembly. Biochim Biophys Acta 1502(1):16–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Conway KA, Lee SJ, Rochet JC, Ding TT, Williamson RE, Lansbury PT (2000) Acceleration of oligomerization, not fibrillization, is a shared property of both α-synuclein mutations linked to early-onset Parkinson’s disease: Implications for pathogenesis and therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97(2):571–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Arnaudov LN, de Vries R (2005) Thermally induced fibrillar aggregation of hen egg white lysozyme. Biophys J 88(1):515–526  https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.104.048819 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Uversky V, Fink A (2004) Conformational constraints for amyloid fibrillation: the importance of being unfolded. Biochim Biophys Acta 1698(2):131–153.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbapap.2003.12.008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Adamcik J, Mezzenga R (2012) Study of amyloid fibrils via atomic force microscopy. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 17(6):369–376  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cocis.2012.08.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rosario-Alomar MF, Quiñones-Ruiz T, Kurouski D, Sereda V, Ferreira EB, Jesús-Kim LD, Lednev IK (2015) Hydrogen sulfide inhibits amyloid formation. J Phys Chem B 119(4):1265–1274  https://doi.org/10.1021/jp508471v CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Quiñones-Ruiz T, Rosario-Alomar MF, Ruiz-Esteves K, Shanmugasundaram M, Grigoryants V, Scholes C, López-Garriga J, Lednev IK (2017) Purple fibrils: a new type of protein chromophore. J Am Chem Soc 139(29):9755–9758  https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b03056 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kurouski D, Dukor RK, Lu X, Nafie LA, Lednev IK (2012) Spontaneous inter-conversion of insulin fibril chirality. Chem Comm 48(23):2837–2839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gasteiger E, Hoogland C, Gattiker A, Duvaud S, Wilkins MR, Appel RD, Bairoch A (2005) Protein identification and analysis tools on the ExPASy server. In: Walker JM (ed) The proteomics protocols handbook. Humana Press Inc, Totowa, NJ, pp 571–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Spigolon D, Gallagher DT, Velazquez-Campoy A, Bulone D, Narang J, San Biagio PL, Cappello F, Macario AJL, Conway de Macario E, Robb FT (2017) Quantitative analysis of the impact of a human pathogenic mutation on the CCT5 chaperonin subunit using a proxy archaeal ortholog. Biochem Biophys Rep 12:66–71, 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrep.2017.07.011 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Geladopoulos TP, Sotiroudis TG, Evangelopoulos AE (1991) A malachite green colorimetric assay for protein phosphatase activity. Anal Biochem 192:112–116 PMID: 1646572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kurouski D, Lauro W, Lednev IK (2010) Amyloid fibrils are “alive”: spontaneous refolding from one polymorph to another. Chem Commun 46:4249–4251.  https://doi.org/10.1039/B926758A CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donatella Bulone
    • 1
  • Pier Luigi San Biagio
    • 1
  • Tatiana Quiñones-Ruiz
    • 2
  • Manuel Rosario-Alomar
    • 2
  • Igor K. Lednev
    • 2
  • Frank T. Robb
    • 3
    • 4
  • Everly Conway de Macario
    • 3
    • 5
  • Alberto J. L. Macario
    • 3
    • 5
    Email author
  1. 1.Institute of Biophysics, SL PalermoNational Research CouncilPalermoItaly
  2. 2.Department of ChemistryUniversity at Albany, SUNYAlbanyUSA
  3. 3.Department of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, University of Maryland at Baltimore-Institute of Marine and Environmental Technology (IMET)BaltimoreUSA
  4. 4.Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research (IBBR)RockvilleUSA
  5. 5.Euro-Mediterranean Institute of Science and Technology (IEMEST)PalermoItaly

Personalised recommendations