Advertisement

Toward Confirmatory On-Site Real-Time Detection of Emerging Drugs Using Portable Ultrafast Capillary Electrophoresis Mass Spectrometry

  • Mehdi Moini
Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1810)

Abstract

Currently, law enforcement agencies rely upon presumptive tests such as color tests (or spot tests) for on-site, real-time identification of forensic evidence, such as controlled substances. These tests are simple and easy to use and require no instrumentation. However, they are unreliable and have a large false positive rate. On the other hand, confirmatory tests are done in analytical laboratories using sophisticated instrumentation by expert analysts, and have lower false positive rates. However, they are bulky and impractical for on-site real-time analysis. To provide more accurate identification of forensic evidence on-site, in real-time, it is important to develop portable confirmatory instrumentation using information-rich technologies. Moreover, because the analysis of controlled substances could be complicated by the existence of various isomers (including optical isomers) it is desirable that the portable instruments have the capability to separate structural and optical isomers of the controlled substances, because scheduling is some times dependent upon which isomer is present. To this end, we have developed a portable ultrafast capillary electrophoresis (UFCE) system for the separation of controlled substances and their structural and optical isomers. The UFCE instrument has an integrated porous tip for facile interfacing with electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. The technique has been successfully applied to the analysis of mixtures of several controlled substances such as amphetamines, cathinones, nor-mephedrone, and pregabalin and their optical isomers in about a minute.

Key words

Quick analysis of illicit drugs Ultrafast capillary electrophoresis mass spectrometry Portable confirmatory technique for forensic analysis On-site real-time detection Integrated electrospray ionization source Attomole sensitivity 

References

  1. 1.
    Gabrielson R, Sanders T (2016) How a$2 roadside drug test sends innocent people to jail. New York Times, 7 JulyGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Choodum A, Daeid NN (2011) Rapid and semi-quantitative presumptive tests for opiate drugs. Talanta 86:284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    O’Neal CL, Crouch DJ, Fatah AA (2000) Validation of twelve chemical spot tests for the detection of drugs of abuse. Forensic Sci Int 109:189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tsumura Y, Mitome T, Kimoto S (2005) False positives and false negatives with a cocaine-specific field test and modification of test protocol to reduce false decision. Forensic Sci Int 155:158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Isaacs RC (2014) A structure-reactivity relationship driven approach to the identification of a color test protocol for the presumptive indication of synthetic cannabimimetic drugs of abuse. Forensic Sci Int 242C:135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cuypers E, Bonneure A-J, Tytgat J (2016) The use of presumptive color tests for new psychoactive substances. Drug Test Anal 8:136–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shintani H, Polonsky J (eds) (1997) Handbook of capillary electrophoresis applications. Blackie Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    Eckenrode BA (2001) Environmental and forensic applications of field-portable GC-MS: an overview. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 12:683–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stout PR, Bynum ND, Lewallen CM, Mitchell JM, Baylor MR, Ropero-Miller JD (2010) A comparison of the validity of gas chromatography–mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry analysis of urine samples II: amphetamine, methamphetamine, (±)-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine, (±)-3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine, (±)-3,4-methylenedioxyethylamphetamine, phencyclidine, and (±)-11-nor-9-carboxy-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol. J Anal Toxicol 34:430–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Perez ER, Knapp JA, Horn CK, Stillman SL, Evans JE, Arfsten DP (2016) Comparison of LC–MS-MS and GC–MS analysis of benzodiazepine compounds included in the drug demand reduction urinalysis program. J Anal Toxicol 40:201–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Marginean I, Rowe WF, Lurie IS (2015) The role of ultra high performance liquid chromatography with time of flight detection for the identification of synthetic cannabinoids in seized drugs. Forensic Sci Int 249:83–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Logan BK, Reinhold LE, Allan X, Diamond FX (2012) Identification of synthetic cannabinoids in herbal incense blends in the United States. J Forensic Sci 57:1168–1180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Patton AL, Seely KA, Chimalakonda KC, Tran JP, Trass M, Miranda A, Fantegrossi WE, Kennedy PD, Dobrowolski P, Radominska-Pandya A, McCain KR, James LP, Endres GW, Moran JH (2013) Targeted metabolomic approach for assessing human synthetic cannabinoid exposure and pharmacology. Anal Chem 85:9390–9399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fan L-Y, He T, Tang Y-Y, Zhang W, Song C-J, Zhao X, Zhao X-Y, Cao C-X (2012) Sensitive determination of barbiturates in biological matrix by capillary electrophoresis using online large-volume sample stacking. J Forensic Sci 57:813–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gottardo R, Fanigliulo A, Sorio D, Liotta E, Bortolotti F, Tagliaro F (2012) Monitoring compliance to therapy during addiction treatments by means of hair analysis for drugs and drug metabolites using capillary zone electrophoresis coupled to time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Forensic Sci Int 216:101–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liaua A-S, Liub J-T, Lina L-C, Chiua Y-C, Shua Y-R, Tsaia C-C, Lina C-H (2003) Optimization of a simple method for the chiral separation of methamphetamine and related compounds in clandestine tablets and urine samples by b-cyclodextrine modified capillary electrophoresis: a complementary method to GC–MS. Forensic Sci Int 134:17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Caslavska J, Thormann W (2011) Stereoselective determination of drugs and metabolites in body fluids, tissues and microsomal preparations by capillary electrophoresis (2000–2010). J Chromatogr A 1218:588–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Boatto G, Nieddu M, Carta A, Pau A, Palomba M, Asproni B, Cerri R (2005) Determination of amphetamine-derived designer drugs in human urine by SPE extraction and capillary electrophoresis with mass spectrometry detection. J Chromatogr B 814:93–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Blaschkea G, Chankvetadze B (2000) Enantiomer separation of drugs by capillary electromigration techniques. J Chromatogr A 875:3–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Huck CW, Huck-Pezzei V, Bakry R, Bachmann S, Najam-ul-Haq M, Rainer M, Bonn GK (2007) Capillary electrophoresis coupled to mass spectrometry for forensic analysis. Open Chem Eng J 1:30–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mohr S, Pilaj S, Schmid MG (2012) Chiral separation of cathinone derivatives used as recreational drugs by cyclodextrin-modified capillary electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 33:1624–1630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Moini M, Rollman C (2015) Compatibility of highly sulfated cyclodextrin with electrospray ionization at low nanoliter/minute flow rates and its application to capillary electrophoresis/electrospray ionization mass spectrometric analysis of cathinone derivatives and their optical isomers. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 29:304–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Moini M, Martinez B (2014) Ultrafast capillary electrophoresis mass spectrometry with adjustable porous tip for a rapid analysis of protein digest in about a minute. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 15:305–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Moini M, Rollman C (2016) Portable, battery operated capillary electrophoresis with optical isomer resolution integrated with ionization source for mass spectrometry. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 27:388–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Müller O, Minarik M, Foret F (1998) Ultrafast DNA analysis by capillary electrophoresis/laser-induced fluorescence detection. Electrophoresis 19:1436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    DeCarlo PF, Kimmel JR, Trimborn A, Northway MJ, Jayne JT, Aiken AC, Gonin M, Fuhrer K, Horvath T, Docherty KS, Worsnop DR, Jimenez JL (2006) A field-deployable high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometer. Anal Chem 78:8281–8289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Graus M, Müller M, Hansel A (2010) High resolution PTR-TOF: quantification and formula confirmation of VOC in real time. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 2:1037–1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sulzer P, Hartungen E, Hanel G, Feil S, Winkler K, Mutschlechner P, Haidacher S, Schottkowsky R, Gunsch D, Seehauser H, Striednig M, Jürschik S, Breiev K, Lanza M, Herbig J, Märk L, Märk TD, Jordan A (2004) A proton transfer reaction-quadrupole interface time-of-flight mass spectrometer (PTR-QiTOF): high speed due to extreme sensitivity. Int J Mass Spectrom 368:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
  31. 31.
    Browne DL, Wright S, Deadman BJ, Dunnage S, Baxendale IR, Turner RM, Ley SV (2012) Continuous flow reaction monitoring using an on-line miniature mass spectrometer. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 26:1999–2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Xu W, Manicke NE, Cooks RG, Ouyang Z (2010) Miniaturization of mass spectrometry analysis systems. JALA Charlottesv Va 15:433–439PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mulligan CC, Vircks HE (2012) Advances in field-portable mass spectrometers for on-site analytics. The American Oil Chemists’ Society, October 2012. https://www.aocs.org/stay-informed/read-inform/featured-articles/advances-in-field-portable-mass-spectrometers-for-on-site-analytics-october-2012
  34. 34.
    Moini M (2007) Simplifying CE-MS operation: 2. Interfacing low-flow separation technique to mass spectrometry using a porous tip. Anal Chem 79:4241–4246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ramautar R, Oleg A (2011) Mayboroda CESI-MS: a new perspective for metabolic profiling of body fluids. Column 7:1–6Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wilm M, Mann M (1996) Analytical properties of the nanoelectrospray ion source. Anal Chem 68(1):1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kelly RT, Page JS, Zhao R, Qian W, Mottaz HM, Tang K, Smith RD (2008) Capillary-based multi nanoelectrospray emitters: improvements in ion transmission efficiency and implementation with capillary reverse-phase LC-ESI-MS. Anal Chem 80:143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Schmidt A, Karas M, Dulks T (2003) Effect of different solution flow rates on analyte ion signals in nano-ESI MS, or: when does ESI turn into nano-ESI. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 14:492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Garza S, Chang S, Moini M (2007) Simplifying capillary electrophoresis–mass spectrometry operation: eliminating capillary derivatization by using self-coating background electrolytes. J Chromatogr A 1159:14–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Rollman CM, Moini M (2016) Ultrafast capillary electrophoresis/mass spectrometry of controlled substances with optical isomer separation in about a minute. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 30:2070–2076CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mehdi Moini
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Forensic SciencesGeorge Washington UniversityWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations