Anesthesia and Monitoring of Animals During MRI Studies

  • Jordi L. Tremoleda
  • Sven Macholl
  • Jane K. Sosabowski
Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1718)

Abstract

The use of imaging represents a major impact on the refinement and the reduction of in vivo studies in animal models, in particular for allowing longitudinal monitoring of the onset and the progression of disease within the same animal, and studying the biological effects of drug candidate and their therapeutic effectiveness. But the use of imaging procedures can affect animal physiology, and the need to anesthetize the animals for imaging entails potential health risks. During anesthesia, there is an inevitable autonomic nervous system depression which induces cardiovascular depression, respiratory depression, and hypothermia. Also other procedures associated with imaging such as animal preparation (e.g., fasting, premedication), blood sampling, and dosage/contrast agent injections can also affect physiology and animal welfare. All these factors are likely to have confounding effect on the outcome of the imaging studies and pose important concerns regarding the animal’s well-being, particularly when imaging immune deprived animals or diseased animals. We will discuss these challenges and considerations during imaging to maximize efficacious data while promoting animal welfare.

Key words

Anesthesia Physiological monitoring Animal welfare 3Rs 

References

  1. 1.
    Driehuys B, Nouls J, Badea A et al (2008) Small animal imaging with magnetic resonance microscope. ILAR J 49:35–53CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bakermans AJ, Abdurrachim D, Moonen RP et al (2015) Small animal cardiovascular MR imaging and spectroscopy. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc 88-89:1–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnmrs.2015.03.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Febo M, Foster TC (2016) Preclinical magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy studies of memory, aging, and cognitive decline. Front Aging Neurosci 8:158. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2016.00158 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sasser TA, Bahadur A, Frederick E et al (2016) Considerations When Setting Up a Preclinical In Vivo Imaging Laboratory. Available via https://www.bruker.com/fileadmin/user_upload/8-PDF-Docs/PreclinicalImaging/Brochures/Considerations_Preclinical_Lab_T158053.pdf. Accessed 7 Nov 2016
  5. 5.
    Sack M, Wetterling F, Sartorius A et al (2014) Signal-to-noise ratio of a mouse brain (13) C CryoProbe™ system in comparison with room temperature coils: spectroscopic phantom and in vivo results. NMR Biomed 27(6):709–715. https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.3110 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ferrari L, Turrini G, Crestan V et al (2012) A robust experimental protocol for pharmacological fMRI in rats and mice. J Neurosci Methods 204:9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.10.020 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tremoleda JL, Kerton A, Gsell W (2012) Anaesthesia and physiological monitoring during in vivo imaging of laboratory rodents: considerations on experimental outcomes and animal welfare. EJNMMI Res 2(1):44. https://doi.org/10.1186/2191-219X-2-44 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Berdoy M, Hawkins P et al (2015) Guiding principles on good practice for animal welfare and ethical review bodies. In: Jennings M (ed) A report by the RSPCA Research Animals Department and LASA Education, Training and Ethics Section. Available via http://www.lasa.co.uk/PDF/AWERB_Guiding_Principles_2015_final.pdf. Accessed 7 Nov 2016
  9. 9.
    IACUC Resources (2016) Available via https://www.aalas.org/iacuc/iacuc_resources#.WADzWfkrJD8 Accessed 7 Nov 2016
  10. 10.
    Directive 2010/63/EU (2016) Legislation for the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. Available via http://ec.europa.eu/environment/chemicals/lab_animals/legislation_en.htm. Accessed 7 Nov 2016
  11. 11.
    Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals National Institutes of Health Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare (2016) Available via http://grants.nih.gov/grants/olaw/references/phspolicylabanimals.pdf. Accessed 7 Nov 2016
  12. 12.
    The ARRIVE Guidelines: Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments (2016) Available via https://www.nc3rs.org.uk/sites/default/files/documents/Guidelines/NC3Rs%20ARRIVE%20Guidelines%202013.pdf Accessed 7 Nov 2016
  13. 13.
    Obernier JA, Baldwin RL (2016) Establishing an appropriate period of acclimatization following transportation of laboratory animals. ILAR J 47(4):364–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    LASA (2010) Guiding Principles for Preparing for and Undertaking Aseptic Surgery. In: Jennings M, Berdoy M (eds) A report by the LASA Education, Training and Ethics section. www.lasa.co.uk/publications.html. Accessed 7 Nov 2016
  15. 15.
    Wolfensohn S, Lloyd M (2003) Anaesthesia of laboratory animals. In: Wolfensohn S, Lloyd M (eds) Handbook of laboratory animal management and welfare, 3rd edn. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470751077.ch7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lovell DP (1986) Variation in pentobarbitone sleeping time in mice. 2. Variables affecting test results. Lab Anim 20:91–96. https://doi.org/10.1258/002367786780865089 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Data Acquisition System – BIOPAC Systems, Inc. (2016) Available via http://www.biopac.com/magnetic-resonance-imaging-mri-compatible. Accessed 7 Nov 2016
  18. 18.
    SAII Small Animal Instruments, Inc. (2016) Available via http://www.i4sa.com/web_app/main/defaultProduct.aspx?ID=76&PT=3. Accessed 7 Nov 2016
  19. 19.
    Peden CJ, Menon DK, Hall AS et al (1992) Magnetic resonance for the anaesthetist. Part II: Aanaesthesia and monitoring in MR units. Anaesthesia 47:508–517CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Colby LA, Morenko BJ (2004) Clinical considerations in rodent bioimaging. Comp Med 54(6):623–630PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hauber HP, Karp D, Goldmann T et al (2010) Effect of low tidal volume ventilation on lung function and inflammation in mice. BMC Pulm Med 10:21. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2466-12-7 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pecchiari M, Monaco A, Koutsoukou A et al (2014) Effects of various modes of mechanical ventilation in normal rats. Anesthesiology 120(4):943–950CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Larach DR, Schuler G, Skeehan TM et al (1988) Mass spectrometry for monitoring respiratory and anaesthetic gas waveforms in rats. J Appl Physiol 65:955–963CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
  25. 25.
    Wagner AE, Brodbelt DC (1997) Arterial blood pressure monitoring in anesthetized animals. J Am Vet Med Assoc 210:1279–1285PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Thal SC, Plesnila N (2007) Non-invasive intraoperative monitoring of blood pressure and arterial pCO2 during surgical anesthesia in mice. J Neurosci Methods 159(2):261–267CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wu XY, Hua YT, Lua L et al (2015) Effect of pentobarbital and isoflurane on acute stress response in rat. Physiol Behav 145:118–121CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kohn DF, Martin TE (eds) (2006) Guidelines for the assessment and management of pain in rodents and rabbits. Available via https://wwwaclamorg/Content/files/files/Public/Active/position_pain-rodent-rabbitpdf Accessed 7 Nov 2016

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jordi L. Tremoleda
    • 1
  • Sven Macholl
    • 2
  • Jane K. Sosabowski
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre for Trauma Sciences, Blizard InstituteQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Centre for Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer InstituteQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations