ER Membrane Protein Interactions Using the Split-Ubiquitin System (SUS)

  • Lisa Yasmin Asseck
  • Niklas Wallmeroth
  • Christopher Grefen
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1691)

Abstract

Protein–protein interactions (PPIs) play fundamental roles in all cellular processes. Especially membrane proteins facilitate a range of important biological functions in stimuli perception, signaling, and transport. Here we describe a detailed protocol for the yeast mating-based Split-Ubiquitin System (mbSUS) to study PPIs of ER membrane proteins in vivo. In contrast to the prominent Yeast Two-Hybrid, mbSUS enables analysis of full-length membrane proteins in their native cellular context. The system is based on the ubiquitin proteasome pathway leading to the release of an artificial transcription factor followed by activation of reporter genes to visualize PPIs. The mating-based approach is suitable for both small- and large-scale interaction studies. Additionally, we describe protocols to apply the recently established SUS Bridge assay (SUB) which is optimized for the detection of ternary protein interactions.

Key words

Protein–protein interaction Ternary interaction Yeast Split Ubiquitin mbSUS SUB Membrane proteins Gateway 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Eva Schwörzer and Laure Grefen for excellent technical support. Work in our lab is supported through seed funding of the SFB1101 and an Emmy Noether fellowship of the German Research Foundation (DFG) to C.G. (GR 4251/1-1).

References

  1. 1.
    Xing S, Wallmeroth N, Berendzen KW, Grefen C (2016) Techniques for the analysis of protein-protein interactions in vivo. Plant Physiol 171:727–758PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Obrdlik P et al (2004) K+ channel interactions detected by a genetic system optimized for systematic studies of membrane protein interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:12242–12247CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Johnsson N, Varshavsky A (1994) Split ubiquitin as a sensor of protein interactions in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91:10340–10344CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Raquet X, Eckert JH, Muller S, Johnsson N (2001) Detection of altered protein conformations in living cells. J Mol Biol 305:927–938CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stagljar I, Korostensky C, Johnsson N, Heesen S (1998) A genetic system based on split-ubiquitin for the analysis of interactions between membrane proteins in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95:5187–5192CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grefen C (2014) The split-ubiquitin system for the analysis of three-component interactions. Methods Mol Biol 1062:659–678CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grefen C, Blatt MR (2012) Do calcineurin B-like proteins interact independently of the serine threonine kinase CIPK23 with the K+ channel AKT1? Lessons learned from a menage a trois. Plant Physiol 159:915–919CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Park E, Rapoport TA (2012) Mechanisms of Sec61/SecY-mediated protein translocation across membranes. Annu Rev Biophys 41:21–40CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grefen C, Lalonde S, Obrdlik P (2007) Split-ubiquitin system for identifying protein-protein interactions in membrane and full-length proteins. Curr Protoc Neurosci. Chapter 5:Unit 5.27Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Grefen C, Obrdlik P, Harter K (2009) The determination of protein-protein interactions by the mating-based split-ubiquitin system (mbSUS). Methods Mol Biol 479:217–233CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Karnik R et al (2015) Binding of SEC11 indicates r role in SNARE recycling after vesicle fusion and identifies two pathways for vesicular traffic to the plasma membrane. Plant Cell 27:675–694CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang B et al (2015) The Arabidopsis R-SNARE VAMP721 interacts with KAT1 and KC1 K+ channels to moderate K+ current at the plasma membrane. Plant Cell 27:1697–1717CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Grefen C et al (2015) A vesicle-trafficking protein commandeers Kv channel voltage sensors for voltage-dependent secretion. Nat Plants 3:15108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Karnik A, Karnik R, Grefen C (2013) SDM-assist software to design site-directed mutagenesis primers introducing “silent” restriction sites. BMC Bioinformatics 14:105CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Xing S, Mehlhorn DG, Wallmeroth N, Asseck LY, Kar R, Voss A, Denninger P, Schmidt VAF, Schwarzlðnder M, Stierhof Y-D, Grossmann G, Grefen C (2017) Loss of GET pathway orthologs in causes root hair growth defects and affects SNARE abundance. Proc Natl Acad Sci 114(8):E1544–E1553Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media LLC 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lisa Yasmin Asseck
    • 1
  • Niklas Wallmeroth
    • 1
  • Christopher Grefen
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Plant Molecular Biology, Developmental GeneticsUniversity of TübingenTübingenGermany

Personalised recommendations