Live-Cell High Content Screening in Drug Development

Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1683)

Abstract

In the past decade, automated microscopy has become an important tool for the drug discovery and development process. The establishment of imaging modalities as screening tools depended on technological breakthroughs in the domain of automated microscopy and automated image analysis. These types of assays are often referred to as high content screening or high content analysis (HCS/HCA). The driving force to adopt imaging for drug development is the quantity and quality of cellular information that can be collected and the enhanced physiological relevance of cellular screening compared to biochemical screening. Most imaging in drug development is performed on fixed cells as this allows uncoupling the preparation of the cells from the acquisition of the images. Live-cell imaging is technically challenging, but is very useful for many aspects of the drug development pipeline such as kinetic studies of compound mode of action or to analyze the motion of cellular components. Most vendors of HCS microscopy systems offer the option of environmental chambers and onboard pipetting on their platforms. This reflects the wish and desire of many customers to have the ability to perform live-cell assays on their HCS automated microscopes. This book chapter summarizes the challenges and advantages of live-cell imaging in drug discovery. Examples of applications are presented and the motivation to perform these assays in kinetic mode is discussed.

Key words

Drug development Imaging Image analysis Live cell Kinetic Environmental control 

References

  1. 1.
    Adams CP, Brantner VV (2010) Spending on new drug development. Health Econ 19:130–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hughes B (2009) 2008 FDA drug approvals. Nat Rev Drug Discov 8:93–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pearson H (2006) The bitterest pill. Nature 444:532–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Giuliano KA, DeBiasio RL, Dunlay RT et al (1997) High-content screening: a new approach to easing key bottlenecks in the drug discovery process. J Biomol Screen 2:249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Denner P, Schmalowsky J, Prechtl S (2008) High-content analysis in preclinical drug discovery. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen 11:216–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Drake PJM, Griffiths GJ, Shaw L et al (2008) Application of high-content analysis to the study of post-translational modifications of the cytoskeleton. J Proteome Res 8:28–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gabriel D, Simonen M (2008) High content screening as improved lead finding strategy. Eur Pharm Rev 2:46–52Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Granas C, Lundholt BK, Loechel F et al (2006) Identification of RAS-mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway modulators in an ERF1 redistribution(R) screen. J Biomol Screen 11:423–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chang YC, Antani S, Lee DJ et al (2008) CBIR of spine X-ray images on inter-vertebral disc space and shape profiles. 21st IEEE international symposium on computer-based medical systems, 17–19 June 2008, Jyvaskyla, Finland, pp 224–229Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Oellers P, Schallenberg M, Stupp T et al (2009) A coculture assay to visualize and monitor interactions between migrating glioma cells and nerve fibers. Nat Protoc 4:923–927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Evensen L, Micklem DR, Link W et al (2010) A novel imaging-based high-throughput screening approach to anti-angiogenic drug discovery. Cytometry A 77A:41–51Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eggert US, Kiger AA, Richter C et al (2004) Parallel chemical genetic and genome-wide RNAi screens identify cytokinesis inhibitors and targets. PLoS Biol 2:e379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    MacDonald ML, Lamerdin J, Owens S et al (2006) Identifying off-target effects and hidden phenotypes of drugs in human cells. Nat Chem Biol 2:329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Young DW, Bender A, Hoyt J et al (2008) Integrating high-content screening and ligand-target prediction to identify mechanism of action. Nat Chem Biol 4:59–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Richards GR, Smith AJ, Parry F et al (2006) A morphology- and kinetics-based Cascade for human neural cell high content screening. Assay Drug Dev Technol 4:143–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schnell U, Dijk F, Sjollema KA et al (2012) Immunolabeling artifacts and the need for live-cell imaging. Nat Methods 9:152–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wing A, Beek P (2004) Motion analysis: a joint centenary. Hum Mov Sci 23(5):iii–iiv. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2004.11.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bahnson A, Athanassiou C, Koebler D et al (2005) Automated measurement of cell motility and proliferation. BMC Cell Biol 6:19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kalaidzidis Y (2007) Intracellular objects tracking. Eur J Cell Biol 86:569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Morimoto T, Kiriyama O, Harada Y, Adachi H, Koide T, Mattausch HJ (2005) Object tracking in video pictures based on image segmentation and pattern matching. IEEE 4:3215–3218Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sacan A, Ferhatosmanoglu H, Coskun H (2008) CellTrack: an open-source software for cell tracking and motility analysis. Bioinformatics 24:1647–1649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Carpenter A, Jones T, Lamprecht M et al (2006) CellProfiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes. Genome Biol 7:R100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rink J, Ghigo E, Kalaidzidis Y et al (2005) Rab conversion as a mechanism of progression from early to late endosomes. Cell 122:735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bacher C, Reichenzeller M, Athale C et al (2004) 4-D single particle tracking of synthetic and proteinaceous microspheres reveals preferential movement of nuclear particles along chromatin. BMC Cell Biol 5:45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Harder N, Mora-Bermúdez F, Godinez WJ et al (2009) Automatic analysis of dividing cells in live cell movies to detect mitotic delays and correlate phenotypes in time. Genome Res 19:2113–2124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Li F, Zhou X, Ma J et al (2010) Multiple nuclei tracking using integer programming for quantitative cancer cell cycle analysis. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 29:96–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wenus J, Düssmann H, Paul P et al (2009) ALISSA: an automated live-cell imaging system for signal transduction analyses. BioTechniques 47:1033–1040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jameson D, Turner D, Ankers J et al (2009) Information management for high content live cell imaging. BMC Bioinformatics 10:226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Walter T, Held M, Neumann B et al (2010) Automatic identification and clustering of chromosome phenotypes in a genome wide RNAi screen by time-lapse imaging. J Struct Biol 170:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Dixit R, Cyr R (2003) Cell damage and reactive oxygen species production induced by fluorescence microscopy: effect on mitosis and guidelines for non-invasive fluorescence microscopy. Plant J 36:280–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hoebe RA, Van Oven CH, Gadella TWJ et al (2007) Controlled light-exposure microscopy reduces photobleaching and phototoxicity in fluorescence live-cell imaging. Nat Biotechnol 25:249–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bernas T, ZarE¸Bski M, Cook RR et al (2004) Minimizing photobleaching during confocal microscopy of fluorescent probes bound to chromatin: role of anoxia and photon flux. J Microsc 215:281–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Chen T-S, Zeng S-Q, Luo Q-M et al (2002) High-order Photobleaching of green fluorescent protein inside live cells in two-photon excitation microscopy. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 291:1272–1275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Chalfie MTY, Euskirchen G, Ward WW, Prasher DC (1994) Green fluorescent protein as a marker for gene expression. Science 263:802–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wang Y, Shyy JYJ, Chien S (2008) Fluorescence proteins, live-cell imaging, and mechanobiology: seeing is believing. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 10:1–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Poser I, Sarov M, Hutchins JRA et al (2008) BAC TransgeneOmics: a high-throughput method for exploration of protein function in mammals. Nat Methods 5:409–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Marx V (2012) Genome-editing tools storm ahead. Nat Methods 9:1055–1059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Maeder ML, Thibodeau-Beganny S, Osiak A et al (2008) Rapid “open-source” engineering of customized zinc-finger nucleases for highly efficient gene modification. Mol Cell 31:294–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Rothbauer U, Zolghadr K, Tillib S et al (2006) Targeting and tracing antigens in live cells with fluorescent nanobodies. Nat Methods 3:887–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bosier B, Hermans E (2007) Versatility of GPCR recognition by drugs: from biological implications to therapeutic relevance. Trends Pharmacol Sci 28:438–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Nikolaev VO, Hoffmann C, Bünemann M et al (2006) Molecular basis of partial Agonism at the neurotransmitter alpha2A-adrenergic receptor and Gi-protein heterotrimer. J Biol Chem 281:24506–24511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Tang Y, Li X, He J et al (2006) Real-time and high throughput monitoring of cAMP in live cells using a fluorescent membrane potential-sensitive dye. Assay Drug Dev Technol 4:461–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ng S-W, Nelson C, Parekh AB (2009) Coupling of Ca2+ microdomains to spatially and temporally distinct cellular responses by the tyrosine kinase Syk. J Biol Chem 284:24767–24772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Eglen RM, Reisine T (2008) Photoproteins: important new tools in drug discovery. Assay Drug Dev Technol 6:659–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Floto RA, MacAry PA, Boname JM et al (2006) Dendritic cell stimulation by mycobacterial Hsp70 is mediated through CCR5. Science 314:454–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Black MJ, Woo Y, Rane SG (2003) Calcium channel upregulation in response to activation of neurotrophin and surrogate neurotrophin receptor tyrosine kinases. J Neurosci Res 74:23–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Buibas M, Yu D, Nizar K et al (2010) Mapping the spatiotemporal dynamics of calcium signaling in cellular neural networks using optical flow. Ann Biomed Eng 38(8):2520–2531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Jaffe L (2008) Calcium waves. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 363:1311–1317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    O’Brien P, Irwin W, Diaz D et al (2006) High concordance of drug-induced human hepatotoxicity with in vitro cytotoxicity measured in a novel cell-based model using high content screening. Arch Toxicol 80:580–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Jan E, Byrne SJ, Cuddihy M et al (2008) High-content screening as a universal tool for fingerprinting of cytotoxicity of nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2:928–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Abraham VC, Towne DL, Waring JF et al (2008) Application of a high-content multiparameter cytotoxicity assay to prioritize compounds based on toxicity potential in humans. J Biomol Screen 13:527–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Liang C-C, Park AY, Guan J-L (2007) In vitro scratch assay: a convenient and inexpensive method for analysis of cell migration in vitro. Nat Protoc 2:329–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Menon MB, Ronkina N, Schwermann J et al (2009) Fluorescence-based quantitative scratch wound healing assay demonstrating the role of MAPKAPK-2/3 in fibroblast migration. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 66:1041–1047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    De Rycker M, Rigoreau L, Dowding S et al (2009) A high-content, cell-based screen identifies micropolyin, a new inhibitor of microtubule dynamics. Chem Biol Drug Des 73:599–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Kumar N, Zaman MH, Kim H-D et al (2006) A high-throughput migration assay reveals HER2-mediated cell migration arising from increased directional persistence. Biophys J 91:L32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Brand P, Lenser T, Hemmerich P (2010) Assembly dynamics of PML nuclear bodies in living cells. PMC Biophys 3:3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Antczak C, Takagi T, Ramirez CN et al (2009) Live-cell imaging of Caspase activation for high-content screening. J Biomol Screen 14:956–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Cervantes S, Prudhomme J, Carter D et al (2009) High-content live cell imaging with RNA probes: advancements in high-throughput antimalarial drug discovery. BMC Cell Biol 10:45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Burney RO, Lee AI, Leong DE et al (2007) A transgenic mouse model for high content, cell cycle phenotype screening in live primary cells. Cell Cycle 15:2276–2283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Tsui M, Xie T, Orth JD et al (2009) An intermittent live cell imaging screen for siRNA enhancers and suppressors of a kinesin-5 inhibitor. PLoS One 4:e7339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Bitomsky N, Hofmann TG (2009) Apoptosis and autophagy: regulation of apoptosis by DNA damage signalling - roles of p53, p73 and HIPK2. FEBS J 276:6074–6083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Nelson DE, Ihekwaba AEC, Elliott M et al (2004) Oscillations in NF-kappa B signaling control the dynamics of gene expression. Science 306:704–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Szymanski J, Mayer C, Hoffmann-Rohrer U et al (2009) Dynamic subcellular partitioning of the nucleolar transcription factor TIF-IA under ribotoxic stress. Biochim Biophys Acta 1793:1191–1198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Saxena G, Chen J, Shalev A (2009) Intracellular shuttling and mitochondrial function of thioredoxin-interacting protein. J Biol Chem 285(6):3997–4005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Wallrabe H, Periasamy A (2005) Imaging protein molecules using FRET and FLIM microscopy. Curr Opin Biotechnol 16:19–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Levitt JA, Matthews DR, Ameer-Beg SM et al (2009) Fluorescence lifetime and polarization-resolved imaging in cell biology. Curr Opin Biotechnol 20:28–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Lohse MJ, Hoffmann C, Nikolaev VO et al (2007) Kinetic analysis of G protein-coupled receptor signaling using fluorescence resonance energy transfer in living cells, Advances in protein chemistry, vol 74. Academic, New York, pp 167–188Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Herbst KJ, Ni Q, Zhang J (2009) Dynamic visualization of signal transduction in living cells: from second messengers to kinases. IUBMB Life 61:902–908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Errington RJ, Ameer-beg SM, Vojnovic B et al (2005) Advanced microscopy solutions for monitoring the kinetics and dynamics of drug-DNA targeting in living cells. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 57:153–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Talbot CB, McGinty J, Grant DM et al (2008) High speed unsupervised fluorescence lifetime imaging confocal multiwell plate reader for high content analysis. J Biophotonics 1:514–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Wolter KG, Hsu Y-T, Smith CL et al (1997) Movement of Bax from the cytosol to mitochondria during apoptosis. J Cell Biol 139:1281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Yu H, West M, Keon BH et al (2003) Measuring drug action in the cellular context using protein-fragment complementation assays. Assay Drug Dev Technol 1:811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Bandara S, Schlöder JP, Eils R et al (2009) Optimal experimental design for parameter estimation of a cell signaling model. PLoS Comput Biol 5:e1000558CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media LLC 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.High Throughput Technology Development Studio (HT-TDS)Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and GeneticsDresdenGermany
  2. 2.Department of Histology and EmbryologyFaculty of Medicine, Masaryk UniversityBrnoCzech Republic
  3. 3.Département de MédecineFaculté des Sciences, University of FribourgAlbert GockelSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations