Making a Morpholino Experiment Work: Controls, Favoring Specificity, Improving Efficacy, Storage, and Dose Protocol First Online: 01 April 2017
Abstract A good Morpholino experiment starts with oligos that have been carefully designed to minimize off-target RNA binding. Performing a successful, reproducible, and well-controlled Morpholino experiment requires oligos that are single stranded and in solution at a known concentration. The outcome of treatment with the oligo needs to be checked for specificity, that is, that the observed outcome is due to interaction with the intended RNA and not an interaction with an unexpected RNA. In this chapter, I will discuss Morpholino use mostly in the context of embryonic microinjection experiments, though many techniques and warnings will be applicable to cell culture or adult animal experiments as well. Controls are critical to a good experiment, but good techniques in designing, preparing, storing, and using the oligos can improve the strength and specificity of the knockdown. Finally, it is important to know the solution concentration of the oligo to ensure that the results are reproducible.
Key words Aggregation BLAST Compensation Coinjection Concentration Controls Dose Efficacy Hypochromic effect Humidor Lyophilization MALDI-TOF Microinjection Mispair Morpholino Nonsense-Mediated Decay Phenocopy p53 Rescue Specificity Storage Synergy Tm Turnover Vehicle-only Vivo-Morpholino
References 1.
Corey DR, Abrams JM (2001) Morpholino antisense oligonucleotides: tools for investigating vertebrate development. Genome Biol 2(5(reviews)):1015.1–1015.3
Google Scholar 2.
Coffman JA, Dickey-Sims C, Haug JS, McCarthy JJ, Robertson AJ (2004) Evaluation of developmental phenotypes produced by morpholino antisense targeting of a sea Urchin Runx3 gene. BMC Biol 2:6
CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral Google Scholar 3.
Summerton JE (1999) Morpholino antisense oligomers: the case for an RNase-H independent structural type. Biochim Biophys Acta 1489:141–158
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 4.
Rossi A, Kontarakis Z, Gerri C, Nolte H, Hölper S, Krüger M, Stainier DYR (2015) Genetic compensation induced by deleterious mutations but not gene knockdowns. Nature 524(7564):230–233. doi:
10.1038/nature14580
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 5.
Novodvorsky P, Watson O, Gray C, Wilkinson RN, Reeve S, Smythe C, Beniston R, Plant K, Maguire R, KA RM, Elworthy S, FJ v E, TJ C (2015) klf2ash317 mutant Zebrafish do not recapitulate morpholino-induced vascular and haematopoietic phenotypes. PLoS One 10(10):e0141611. doi:
10.1371/journal.pone.0141611
CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral Google Scholar 6.
Blum M, De Robertis EM, Wallingford JB, Niehrs C (2015) Morpholinos: antisense and sensibility. Dev Cell 35(2):145–149. doi:
10.1016/j.devcel.2015.09.017
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 7.
Eisen JS, Smith JC (2008) Controlling morpholino experiments: don't stop making antisense. Development 135(10):1735–1743
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 8.
Bill BR, Petzold AM, Clark KJ, Schimmenti LA, Ekker SC (2009) A primer for morpholino use in zebrafish. Zebrafish 6(1):69–77
CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral Google Scholar 9.
Kamachi Y, Okuda Y, Kondoh H (2008) Quantitative assessment of the knockdown efficiency of morpholino antisense oligonucleotides in zebrafish embryos using a luciferase assay. Genesis 46(1):1–7
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 10.
Kang SH, Cho MJ, Kole R (1998) Up-regulation of luciferase gene expression with antisense oligonucleotides: implications and applications in functional assay development. Biochemistry 37(18):6235–6239
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 11.
Robu ME, Larson JD, Nasevicius A, Beiraghi S, Brenner C, Farber SA, Ekker SC (2007) p53 activation by knockdown technologies. PLoS Genet 3(5):e78
CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral Google Scholar 12.
Danilova N, Kumagai A, Lin J (2010) p53 Upregulation Is a Frequent Response to Deficiency of Cell-Essential Genes. PLoS One 5(12):e15938
CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral Google Scholar 13.
Wallingford JB, Seufert DW, Virta VC, Vize PD (1997) p53 activity is essential for normal development in Xenopus. Curr Biol 7(10):747–757
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 14.
McKeon J, Cho MJ, Khaledi MG (2001) Quantitation of intracellular concentration of a delivered morpholino oligomer by capillary electrophoresis-laser- induced fluorescence: correlation with upregulation of luciferase gene expression. Anal Biochem 293(1):1–7
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 15.
Umemoto N, Nishimura Y, Shimada Y, Yamanaka Y, Kishi S, Ito S, Okamori K, Nakamura Y, Kuroyanagi J, Zhang Z, Zang L, Wang Z, Nishimura N, Tanaka T (2013) Fluorescent-based methods for gene knockdown and functional cardiac imaging in zebrafish. Mol Biotechnol 55:131. doi:
10.1007/s12033-013-9664-6
CrossRef PubMed PubMedCentral Google Scholar 16.
Riedel-Kruse IH, Muller C, Oates AC (2007) Synchrony dynamics during initiation, failure, and rescue of the segmentation clock. Science 317(5846):1911–1915
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar © Springer Science+Business Media LLC 2017
Authors and Affiliations 1. Gene Tools, LLC Philomath USA