The Controlled Cortical Impact Model of Experimental Brain Trauma: Overview, Research Applications, and Protocol

Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1462)

Abstract

Controlled cortical impact (CCI) is a commonly used and highly regarded model of brain trauma that uses a pneumatically or electromagnetically controlled piston to induce reproducible and well-controlled injury. The CCI model was originally used in ferrets and it has since been scaled for use in many other species. This chapter will describe the historical development of the CCI model, compare and contrast the pneumatic and electromagnetic models, and summarize key short- and long-term consequences of TBI that have been gleaned using this model. In accordance with the recent efforts to promote high-quality evidence through the reporting of common data elements (CDEs), relevant study details—that should be reported in CCI studies—will be noted.

Key words

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) Experimental brain injury Preclinical Animal model Controlled cortical impact (CCI) Common data elements (CDE) 

References

  1. 1.
    Kramer SP (1896) A contribution to the theory of cerebral concussion. Anim Surg 23:163–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rinder L, Olsson Y (1968) Studies on vascular permeability changes in experimental brain concussion. I. Distribution of circulating fluorescent indicators in brain and cervical cord after sudden mechanical loading of the brain. Acta Neuropathol 11:183–200PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Denny-Brown D, Russell W (1941) Experimental cerebral concussion. Brain 64:93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lindgren S, Rinder L (1965) Experimental studies in head injury. I. Some factors influencing results of model experiments. Biophysik 2:320–329PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lighthall JW (1988) Controlled cortical impact: a new experimental brain injury model. J Neurotrauma 5:1–15CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gennarelli TA, Thibault LE, Adams JH, Graham DI, Thompson CJ, Marcincin RP (1982) Diffuse axonal injury and traumatic coma in the primate. Ann Neurol 12:564–574CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Govons SR, Govons RB, VanHuss WD, Heusner WW (1972) Brain concussion in the rat. Exp Neurol 34:121–128CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nilsson B, Pontén U, Voigt G (1977) Experimental head injury in the rat. Part 1: Mechanics, pathophysiology, and morphology in an impact acceleration trauma model. J Neurosurg 47:241–251CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ommaya AK, Geller A, Parsons LC (1971) The effect of experimental head injury on one-trial learning in rats. Int J Neurosci 1:371–378CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ommaya AK, Gennarelli TA (1974) Cerebral concussion and traumatic unconsciousness. Correlation of experimental and clinical observations of blunt head injuries. Brain 97:633–654CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sullivan HG, Martinez J, Becker DP, Miller JD, Griffith R, Wist AO (1976) Fluid-percussion model of mechanical brain injury in the cat. J Neurosurg 45:521–534CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cannon WB (1901) Cerebral pressure following trauma. Am J Physiol 6:91–121Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Parkinson D, West M, Pathiraja T (1978) Concussion: comparison of humans and rats. Neurosurgery 3:176–180CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Onyszchuk G, Al-Hafez B, He Y-Y, Bilgen M, Berman NEJ, Brooks WM (2007) A mouse model of sensorimotor controlled cortical impact: characterization using longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging, behavioral assessments and histology. J Neurosci Methods 160:187–196CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lighthall JW, Goshgarian HG, Pinderski CR (1990) Characterization of axonal injury produced by controlled cortical impact. J Neurotrauma 7:65–76CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dixon C, Clifton G, Lighthall J, Yaghmai A, Hayes R (1991) A controlled cortical impact model of traumatic brain injury in the rat. J Neurosci Methods 39:253–262CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shitaka Y, Tran HT, Bennett RE, Sanchez L, Levy MA, Dikranian K, Brody DL (2011) Repetitive closed-skull traumatic brain injury in mice causes persistent multifocal axonal injury and microglial reactivity. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 70:551–567CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Klemenhagen KC, O’Brien SP, Brody DL (2013) Repetitive concussive traumatic brain injury interacts with post-injury foot shock stress to worsen social and depression-like behavior in mice. PLoS One 8:e74510CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Petraglia AL, Plog BA, Dayawansa S, Chen M, Dashnaw ML, Czerniecka K, Walker CT, Viterise T, Hyrien O, Iliff JJ, Deane R, Nedergaard M, Huang JH (2014) The spectrum of neurobehavioral sequelae after repetitive mild traumatic brain injury: a novel mouse model of chronic traumatic encephalopathy. J Neurotrauma 31:1211–1224CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dixon C, Kochanek P, Yan H, Schiding J, Griffith R, Baum E, Marion D, DeKosky S (1999) One-year study of spatial memory performance, brain morphology, and cholinergic markers after moderate controlled cortical impact in rats. J Neurotrauma 16:109–122CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Xiong Y, Zhang Y, Mahmood A, Meng Y, Zhang ZG, Morris DC, Chopp M (2012) Neuroprotective and neurorestorative effects of thymosin β4 treatment initiated 6 hours after traumatic brain injury in rats. J Neurosurg 116:1081–1092CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Meng Y, Xiong Y, Mahmood A, Zhang Y, Qu C, Chopp M (2011) Dose-dependent neurorestorative effects of delayed treatment of traumatic brain injury with recombinant human erythropoietin in rats. J Neurosurg 115:550–560CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Longhi L, Watson DJ, Saatman KE, Thompson HJ, Zhang C, Fujimoto S, Royo N, Castelbuono D, Raghupathi R, Trojanowski JQ, Lee VM-Y, Wolfe JH, Stocchetti N, McIntosh TK (2004) Ex vivo gene therapy using targeted engraftment of NGF-expressing human NT2N neurons attenuates cognitive deficits following traumatic brain injury in mice. J Neurotrauma 21:1723–1736CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Longhi L, Gesuete R, Perego C, Ortolano F, Sacchi N, Villa P, Stocchetti N, De Simoni M-G (2011) Long-lasting protection in brain trauma by endotoxin preconditioning. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 31:1919–1929CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cheng JP, Shaw KE, Monaco CM, Hoffman AN, Sozda CN, Olsen AS, Kline AE (2012) A relatively brief exposure to environmental enrichment after experimental traumatic brain injury confers long-term cognitive benefits. J Neurotrauma 29:2684–2688CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fox GB, Faden AI (1998) Traumatic brain injury causes delayed motor and cognitive impairment in a mutant mouse strain known to exhibit delayed Wallerian degeneration. J Neurosci Res 53:718–727CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dixon CE, Hamm RJ, Taft WC, Hayes RL (1994) Increased anticholinergic sensitivity following closed skull impact and controlled cortical impact traumatic brain injury in the rat. J Neurotrauma 11:275–287CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Marklund N, Morales D, Clausen F, Hånell A, Kiwanuka O, Pitkänen A, Gimbel DA, Philipson O, Lannfelt L, Hillered L, Strittmatter SM, McIntosh TK (2009) Functional outcome is impaired following traumatic brain injury in aging Nogo-A/B-deficient mice. Neuroscience 163:540–551CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chauhan NB, Gatto R (2010) Synergistic benefits of erythropoietin and simvastatin after traumatic brain injury. Brain Res 1360:177–192CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chauhan NB, Gatto R (2011) Restoration of cognitive deficits after statin feeding in TBI. Restor Neurol Neurosci 29:23–34PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Byrnes KR, Loane DJ, Stoica BA, Zhang J, Faden AI (2012) Delayed mGluR5 activation limits neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration after traumatic brain injury. J Neuroinflammation 9:43CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zhang Y, Chopp M, Mahmood A, Meng Y, Qu C, Xiong Y (2012) Impact of inhibition of erythropoietin treatment-mediated neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus on restoration of spatial learning after traumatic brain injury. Exp Neurol 235:336–344CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tomasevic G, Laurer HL, Mattiasson G, van Steeg H, Wieloch T, McIntosh TK (2012) Delayed neuromotor recovery and increased memory acquisition dysfunction following experimental brain trauma in mice lacking the DNA repair gene XPA. J Neurosurg 116:1368–1378CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Xiong Y, Zhang Y, Mahmood A, Meng Y, Qu C, Chopp M (2011) Erythropoietin mediates neurobehavioral recovery and neurovascular remodeling following traumatic brain injury in rats by increasing expression of vascular endothelial growth factor. Transl Stroke Res 2:619–632CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Han R-Z, Hu J-J, Weng Y-C, Li D-F, Huang Y (2009) NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 reduces neuronal damage and preserves learning and memory in a rat model of traumatic brain injury. Neurosci Bull 25:367–375CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Shultz SR, Bao F, Omana V, Chiu C, Brown A, Cain DP (2012) Repeated mild lateral fluid percussion brain injury in the rat causes cumulative long-term behavioral impairments, neuroinflammation, and cortical loss in an animal model of repeated concussion. J Neurotrauma 29:281–294CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Shultz SR, Bao F, Weaver LC, Cain DP, Brown A (2013) Treatment with an anti-CD11d integrin antibody reduces neuroinflammation and improves outcome in a rat model of repeated concussion. J Neuroinflammation 10:26CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hamm RJ, Pike BR, Temple MD, O’Dell DM, Lyeth BG (1995) The effect of postinjury kindled seizures on cognitive performance of traumatically brain-injured rats. Exp Neurol 136:143–148CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hoane MR (2004) Magnesium therapy and recovery of function in experimental models of brain injury and neurodegenerative disease. Clin Calcium 14:65–70PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Xiong Y, Mahmood A, Zhang Y, Meng Y, Zhang ZG, Qu C, Sager TN, Chopp M (2011) Effects of posttraumatic carbamylated erythropoietin therapy on reducing lesion volume and hippocampal cell loss, enhancing angiogenesis and neurogenesis, and improving functional outcome in rats following traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg 114:549–559CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Rau TF, Kothiwal AS, Rova AR, Brooks DM, Poulsen DJ (2012) Treatment with low-dose methamphetamine improves behavioral and cognitive function after severe traumatic brain injury. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 73:S165–S172CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hallam TM, Floyd CL, Folkerts MM, Lee LL, Gong Q-Z, Lyeth BG, Muizelaar JP, Berman RF (2004) Comparison of behavioral deficits and acute neuronal degeneration in rat lateral fluid percussion and weight-drop brain injury models. J Neurotrauma 21:521–539CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Thompson HJ, LeBold DG, Marklund N, Morales DM, Hagner AP, McIntosh TK (2006) Cognitive evaluation of traumatically brain-injured rats using serial testing in the Morris water maze. Restor Neurol Neurosci 24:109–114PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Osier ND, Carlson SW, DeSana A, Dixon CE (2015) Chronic histopathological and behavioral outcomes of experimental traumatic brain injury in adult male animals. J Neurotrauma 32:1861. doi:10.1089/neu.2014.3680 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Fox GB, LeVasseur RA, Faden AI (1999) Behavioral responses of C57BL/6, FVB/N, and 129/SvEMS mouse strains to traumatic brain injury: implications for gene targeting approaches to neurotrauma. J Neurotrauma 16:377–389CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Hannay HJ, Feldman Z, Phan P, Keyani A, Panwar N, Goodman JC, Robertson CS (1999) Validation of a controlled cortical impact model of head injury in mice. J Neurotrauma 16:1103–1114CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Fox GB, Fan L, LeVasseur RA, Faden AI (1998) Sustained sensory/motor and cognitive deficits with neuronal apoptosis following controlled cortical impact brain injury in the mouse. J Neurotrauma 15:599–614CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Smith DH, Soares HD, Pierce JS, Perlman KG, Saatman KE, Meaney DF, Dixon CE, McIntosh TK (1995) A model of parasagittal controlled cortical impact in the mouse: cognitive and histopathologic effects. J Neurotrauma 12:169–178CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Han X, Tong J, Zhang J, Farahvar A, Wang E, Yang J, Samadani U, Smith DH, Huang JH (2011) Imipramine treatment improves cognitive outcome associated with enhanced hippocampal neurogenesis after traumatic brain injury in mice. J Neurotrauma 28:995–1007CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Scafidi S, Racz J, Hazelton J, McKenna MC, Fiskum G (2010) Neuroprotection by acetyl-L-carnitine after traumatic injury to the immature rat brain. Dev Neurosci 32:480–487PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Duhaime AC, Margulies SS, Durham SR, O’Rourke MM, Golden JA, Marwaha S, Raghupathi R (2000) Maturation-dependent response of the piglet brain to scaled cortical impact. J Neurosurg 93:455–462CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Manley GT, Rosenthal G, Lam M, Morabito D, Yan D, Derugin N, Bollen A, Knudson MM, Panter SS (2006) Controlled cortical impact in swine: pathophysiology and biomechanics. J Neurotrauma 23:128–139CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Costine BA, Quebeda-Clerkin PB, Dodge CP, Harris BT, Hillier SC, Duhaime A-C (2012) Neuron-specific enolase, but not S100B or myelin basic protein, increases in peripheral blood corresponding to lesion volume after cortical impact in piglets. J Neurotrauma 29:2689–2695CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Kline AE, Dixon CE (2001) Contemporary in vivo models of brain trauma and a comparison of injury responses. In: Miller LP, Hayes RL (eds) Head trauma: basic, preclinical, and clinical directions. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, pp 65–84Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    King C, Robinson T, Dixon CE, Rao GR, Larnard D, Nemoto CEM (2010) Brain temperature profiles during epidural cooling with the ChillerPad in a monkey model of traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 27:1895–1903CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Dennis AM, Haselkorn ML, Vagni VA, Garman RH, Janesko-Feldman K, Bayir H, Clark RSB, Jenkins LW, Dixon CE, Kochanek PM (2009) Hemorrhagic shock after experimental traumatic brain injury in mice: effect on neuronal death. J Neurotrauma 26:889–899CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Sandhir R, Berman NEJ (2010) Age-dependent response of CCAAT/enhancer binding proteins following traumatic brain injury in mice. Neurochem Int 56:188–193CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Hemerka JN, Wu X, Dixon CE, Garman RH, Exo JL, Shellington DK, Blasiole B, Vagni VA, Janesko-Feldman K, Xu M, Wisniewski SR, Bayır H, Jenkins LW, Clark RSB, Tisherman SA, Kochanek PM (2012) Severe brief pressure-controlled hemorrhagic shock after traumatic brain injury exacerbates functional deficits and long-term neuropathological damage in mice. J Neurotrauma 29:2192–2208CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Monaco CM, Mattiola VV, Folweiler KA, Tay JK, Yelleswarapu NK, Curatolo LM, Matter AM, Cheng JP, Kline AE (2013) Environmental enrichment promotes robust functional and histological benefits in female rats after controlled cortical impact injury. Exp Neurol 247:410–418CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Pleasant JM, Carlson SW, Mao H, Scheff SW, Yang KH, Saatman KE (2011) Rate of neurodegeneration in the mouse controlled cortical impact model is influenced by impactor tip shape: implications for mechanistic and therapeutic studies. J Neurotrauma 28:2245–2262CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Statler KD, Kochanek PM, Dixon CE, Alexander HL, Warner DS, Clark RS, Wisniewski SR, Graham SH, Jenkins LW, Marion DW, Safar PJ (2000) Isoflurane improves long-term neurologic outcome versus fentanyl after traumatic brain injury in rats. J Neurotrauma 17:1179–1189CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Statler KD, Alexander H, Vagni V, Holubkov R, Dixon CE, Clark R, Jenkins L, Kochanek PM (2006) Isoflurane exerts neuroprotective actions at or near the time of severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Res 1076:216–224CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    McDonald JW, Roeser NF, Silverstein FS, Johnston MV (1989) Quantitative assessment of neuroprotection against NMDA-induced brain injury. Exp Neurol 106:289–296CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    McPherson RW, Kirsch JR, Salzman SK, Traystman RJ (1994) The neurobiology of central nervous system trauma. Oxford University Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Cole JT, Yarnell A, Kean WS, Gold E, Lewis B, Ren M, McMullen DC, Jacobowitz DM, Pollard HB, O’Neill JT, Grunberg NE, Dalgard CL, Frank JA, Watson WD (2011) Craniotomy: true sham for traumatic brain injury, or a sham of a sham? J Neurotrauma 28:359–369CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Shin SS, Bray ER, Dixon CE (2012) Effects of nicotine administration on striatal dopamine signaling after traumatic brain injury in rats. J Neurotrauma 29:843–850CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Shin SS, Bales JW, Yan HQ, Kline AE, Wagner AK, Lyons-Weiler J, Dixon CE (2013) The effect of environmental enrichment on substantia nigra gene expression after traumatic brain injury in rats. J Neurotrauma 30:259–270CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Meaney DF, Ross DT, Winkelstein BA, Brasko J, Goldstein D, Bilston LB, Thibault LE, Gennarelli TA (1994) Modification of the cortical impact model to produce axonal injury in the rat cerebral cortex. J Neurotrauma 11:599–612CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    He J, Evans C-O, Hoffman SW, Oyesiku NM, Stein DG (2004) Progesterone and allopregnanolone reduce inflammatory cytokines after traumatic brain injury. Exp Neurol 189:404–412CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    RIGOR Improving the quality of NINDS-supported pre-clinical and clinical research through rigorous study design and transparent reportingGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Safar Center for Resuscitation ResearchUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA
  2. 2.School of NursingUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA
  3. 3.Department of Neurological SurgeryUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA
  4. 4.V.A. Pittsburgh Healthcare SystemPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations