Protein modification by SUMO proteins is one of the key posttranslational modifications in eukaryotes. Here, we describe a workflow to analyze SUMO dynamics in response to different stimuli, purify SUMO conjugates, and analyze the changes in SUMOylation level in organisms, tissues, or cell culture. We present a protocol for lysis in denaturing conditions that is compatible with downstream IMAC and antibody affinity purification, followed by mass spectrometry and data analysis.
SUMO Ubiquitin like proteins Posttranslational modifications Label-free proteomics Stress response
Springer Nature is developing a new tool to find and evaluate Protocols. Learn more
The work was supported by National Science Centre (Narodowe Centrum Nauki) grant DEC 1/Z/2011/01/M/NZ2/02997. The authors would like to acknowledge networking support by the Proteostasis COST Action (BM1307).
Flotho A, Melchior F (2013) Sumoylation: a regulatory protein modification in health and disease. Annu Rev Biochem 82:357–385CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Schimmel J et al (2014) Uncovering SUMOylation dynamics during cell-cycle progression reveals FoxM1 as a key mitotic SUMO target protein. Mol Cell 53:1053–1066CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Impens F, Radoshevich L, Cossart P, Ribet D (2014) Mapping of SUMO sites and analysis of SUMOylation changes induced by external stimuli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:12432–12437CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Psakhye I, Jentsch S (2012) Protein group modification and synergy in the SUMO pathway as exemplified in DNA repair. Cell 151:807–820CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Golebiowski F et al (2009) System-wide changes to SUMO modifications in response to heat shock. Sci Signal 2:ra24CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Wiśniewski JR, Zougman A, Nagaraj N, Mann M (2009) Universal sample preparation method for proteome analysis. Nat Methods 6:359–362CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Cox J, Mann M (2008) MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat Biotechnol 26:1367–1372CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar