Advertisement

High-Resolution Scanning Electron Microscopy and Immuno-Gold Labeling of the Nuclear Lamina and Nuclear Pore Complex

  • Martin W. GoldbergEmail author
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1411)

Abstract

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) is a technique used to image surfaces. Field emission SEMs (feSEMs) can resolve structures that are ~0.5–1.5 nm apart. FeSEM, therefore is a useful technique for imaging molecular structures that exist at surfaces such as membranes. The nuclear envelope consists of four membrane surfaces, all of which may be accessible for imaging. Imaging of the cytoplasmic face of the outer membrane gives information about ribosomes and cytoskeletal attachments, as well as details of the cytoplasmic peripheral components of the nuclear pore complex, and is the most easily accessed surface. The nucleoplasmic face of the inner membrane is easily accessible in some cells, such as amphibian oocytes, giving valuable details about the organization of the nuclear lamina and how it interacts with the nuclear pore complexes. The luminal faces of both membranes are difficult to access, but may be exposed by various fracturing techniques. Protocols are presented here for the preparation, labeling, and feSEM imaging of Xenopus laevis oocyte nuclear envelopes.

Key words

Nuclear envelope Nuclear pore complex Scanning electron microscopy Nuclear lamina 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Christine Richardson, Helen Grindley, Pam Ritchie, and Sandra Rutherford for technical assistance, Terry Allen, Herbert Macgregor, Reimer Stick, and the late Rob Apkarian for help in developing these methods, and the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, UK, grant number BB/G011818/1 for funding.

References

  1. 1.
    Zuleger N, Kerr AR, Schirmer EC (2012) Many mechanisms, one entrance: membrane protein translocation into the nucleus. Cell Mol Life Sci 69:2205–2216CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aebi U, Cohn J, Buhle L, Gerace L (1986) The nuclear lamina is a meshwork of intermediate-type filaments. Nature 323:560–564CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goldberg MW, Huttenlauch I, Hutchison CJ, Stick R (2008) Filaments made from A- and B-type lamins differ in structure and organization. J Cell Sci 121:215–225CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Peter A, Stick R (2015) Evolutionary aspects in intermediate filament proteins. Curr Opin Cell Biol 32:48–55CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cartwright S, Karakesisoglou I (2014) Nesprins in health and disease. Semin Cell Dev Biol 29:169–179CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bui KH, von Appen A, DiGuilio AL et al (2013) Integrated structural analysis of the human nuclear pore complex scaffold. Cell 155:1233–1243CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goldberg MW, Allen TD (1996) The nuclear pore complex and lamina: three-dimensional structures and interactions determined by field emission in-lens scanning electron microscopy. J Mol Biol 257:848–865CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ben-Harush K, Wiesel N, Frenkiel-Krispin D et al (2009) The supramolecular organization of the C. elegans nuclear lamin filament. J Mol Biol 386:1392–1402CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Strelkov SV, Schumacher J, Burkhard P et al (2004) Crystal structure of the human lamin A coil 2B dimer: implications for the head-to-tail association of nuclear lamins. J Mol Biol 343:1067–1080CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Allen TD, Rutherford SA, Bennion GR et al (1998) Three-dimensional surface structure analysis of the nucleus. Methods Cell Biol 53:125–138CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Goldberg MW, Allen TD (1992) High resolution scanning electron microscopy of the nuclear envelope: demonstration of a new, regular, fibrous lattice attached to the baskets of the nucleoplasmic face of the nuclear pores. J Cell Biol 119:1429–1440CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kiseleva E, Goldberg MW, Allen TD, Akey CW (1998) Active nuclear pore complexes in Chironomus. Visualisation of transporter configuration related to mRNP export. J Cell Sci 111:223–236PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Goldberg MW, Solovei I, Allen TD (1997) Nuclear pore complex structure in birds. J Struct Biol 119:284–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kiseleva E, Rutherford SA, Cotter LM, Allen TD, Goldberg MW (2001) Steps of nuclear pore complexes disassembly and reassembly during mitosis in early drosophila embryos. J Cell Sci 114:3607–3618PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stick R, Goldberg MW (2010) Oocytes as an experimental system to analyze the ultrastructure of endogenous and ectopically expressed nuclear envelope components by field-emission scanning electron microscopy. Methods 51:170–176CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kiseleva E, Drummond SP, Goldberg MW et al (2004) Actin- and protein-4.1-containing filaments link nuclear pore complexes to subnuclear organelles in Xenopus oocyte nuclei. J Cell Sci 117:2481–2490CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wallace RA, Jared DW, Dumont JN, Sega MW (1973) Protein incorporation by isolated amphibian oocytes. J Exp Zool 184:321–333CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Biological and Biomedical SciencesDurham UniversityDurhamUK

Personalised recommendations