Bead Beating Offers High-Performance Homogenization for Molecular Biology Downstream Processing of Tough and Difficult Samples
Abstract
Sample preparation is a critical step which proceeds molecular downstream analysis such as DNA, RNA, protein, enzymatic, or drug extraction. The Precellys homogenizers are the most efficient bead-beating technology available due to its three-dimensional motion, which provides powerful vertical and horizontal shearing forces. The Precellys lysing kits are 0.5, 2, 7, or 15 mL tubes prefilled with different matrix such as ceramic (zirconium oxide), glass, or metal (stainless steel) beads. Each lysing kit has been validated for a certain subset of tissues types, and can effectively homogenize any type of difficult sample such as tumor tissues, bones, teeth, or microorganisms. The Precellys homogenizers offer low and high-throughput options, and up to 3 samples (low throughput) or 24 samples (high-throughput) can be processed simultaneously, in typically 30–60 seconds for most sample types. For thermo-sensitive applications such as RNA, enzymatic, or metabolite extraction, the Cryolys cooling unit can be used to maintain a constant low temperature of 4 °C within the Precellys sample processing chamber. The use of sealed lysing tubes prevents cross-contamination and maintains reproducibility amongst biological replicates due to the semi-automated operation of the homogenizers. Precellys protocols are programmable for speed, number of cycles, and duration of each cycle. Therefore, bead-beating technology is superior to traditional manual methods such as mortar and pestle or ultrasonication, which are time consuming (processes one sample at a time), labor-intensive, and introduces user variation.
Keywords
Homogenization Sample preparation Bead-beating DNA RNA Protein extraction Molecular biology Animal, human, plant tissue Microorganisms Forensics Precellys HomogenizerReferences
- 1.McCarthy J, Hopwood F, Oxley D, Laver M, Castagna A, Righetti PG et al (2003) Carbamylation of proteins in 2-D electrophoresis: myth or reality? J Proteome Res 2:239–242CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 2.Ason B, Castro-Perez J, Tep S, Stefanni A, Tadin-Strapps M, Roddy T et al (2011) ApoB siRNA-induced liver steatosis is resistant to clearance by the loss of fatty acid transport protein 5 (Fatp5). Lipids 11:991–1003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Courtin A, Richards FM, Bapiro TE, Bramhall JL, Neese A, Cook N et al (2013) Anti-tumour efficacy of capecitabine in a genetically engineered mouse model of pancreatic cancer. PLoS One 8:e67330PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 4.Ehreneiter K, Kern F, Velamoor V, Meissl K, Galabova-Kovacs G, Sibilia M et al (2009) Raf-1 addiction in Ras-induced skin carcinogenesis. Cancer Cell 16:149–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Banneau B, Ayadi M, Aremenoult L, Carvalho E (2012) Homogenization of cartilage tumors to extract total RNA to microarray and sequencing analysis using Precellys bead-beating technology. Biotechniques 52:196–197Google Scholar
- 6.Lopez I, Oliveira LP, Tucci P, Alvarez-Valin F, Coudry RA, Marin M (2012) Different mutation profiles associated to P53 accumulation in colorectal cancer. Gene 10:81–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Santos L, Paul A, Yu V (2013) Improving compound extraction efficiency. Gen 33:24–25Google Scholar
- 8.McLaren DG, He T, Wang SP, Mendoza V, Rosa R, Gagen K et al (2011) The use of stable-isotopically labeled oleic acid to interrogate lipid assembly in vivo: assessing pharmacological effects in preclinical species. J Lipid Res 52:1150–1161PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Colin et al. Precellys 24 as a useful screening tool in preformulation for micronisation and co-micronisation of small quantities of poorly water-soluble pharmaceutical API. Poster presented at the 2nd conference on Innovation in drug delivery, Aix-en Provence, France, 3–6 October 2010.Google Scholar
- 10.Colin A, Verollet R, Guo Y, Li X, Bonhomme C, Hecq J et al. Use of Precellys as a new tool for the investigation of nanomilling of small quantities of poorly water-soluble pharmaceutical API. Poster presented at the 2nd conference on Poorly soluble drugs workshop, Lille, France, 2 July 2014.Google Scholar
- 11.Toledo DM, Alves HB. DNA human identification from bone fragments. http://www.precellys.com/application-center/detail2.aspx?document-application-center-search&detail=4415. Accessed July 25, 2014.
- 12.Concheiro M, Cruz A, Mon M, de Castro A, Quintela O, Lorenzo A et al (2009) Ethylglucuronide determination in urine and hair from alcohol withdrawal patients. J Anal Toxicol 33:155–161CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Hancock IC (1997) Bacterial cell surface carbohydrates: structure and assembly. Biochem Soc Trans 25:183–187CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Volossiouk T, Robb EJ, Nazar RN (1995) Direct DNA extraction for PCR-mediated assays of soil organisms. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:3972–3976PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Zhou J, Bruns MA, Tiedje JM (1996) DNA recovery from soils of diverse composition. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:316–322PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Leite GM, Magan N, Medina A (2012) Comparison of different bead-beating RNA extraction strategies: an optimized method for filamentous fungi. J Microbiol Methods 88:413–418CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Kaser M, Ruf MT, Hauser J, Marsollier L, Pluschke G (2009) Optimized method for preparation of DNA from pathogenic and environmental mycobacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:414–418PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar