Microfluidics-Enabled Enzyme Activity Measurement in Single Cells

  • Cinzia Tesauro
  • Rikke Frøhlich
  • Magnus Stougaard
  • Yi-Ping Ho
  • Birgitta R. Knudsen
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1346)

Abstract

Cellular heterogeneity has presented a significant challenge in the studies of biology. While most of our understanding is based on the analysis of ensemble average, individual cells may process information and respond to perturbations very differently. Presented here is a highly sensitive platform capable of measuring enzymatic activity at the single-cell level. The strategy innovatively combines a rolling circle-enhanced enzyme activity detection (REEAD) assay with droplet microfluidics. The single-molecule sensitivity of REEAD allows highly sensitive detection of enzymatic activities, i.e. at the single catalytic event level, whereas the microfluidics enables isolation of single cells. Further, confined reactions in picoliter-sized droplets significantly improve enzyme extraction from human cells or microorganisms and result in faster reaction kinetics. Taken together, the described protocol is expected to open up new possibilities in the single-cell research, particularly for the elucidation of heterogeneity in a population of cells.

Key words

Human topoisomerase I Microfluidics Single-molecule detection Single-cell analysis Rolling circle amplification Enzyme activity 

References

  1. 1.
    Leppard JB, Champoux JJ (2005) Human DNA topoisomerase I: relaxation, roles, and damage control. Chromosoma 114:75–85, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15830206. Accessed 3 Oct 2013CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pommier Y (2006) Topoisomerase I inhibitors: camptothecins and beyond. Nat Rev Cancer 6:789–802, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16990856. Accessed 3 Oct 2013CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pfister TD, Reinhold WC, Agama K, Gupta S, Khin S a, Kinders RJ et al (2009) Topoisomerase I levels in the NCI-60 cancer cell line panel determined by validated ELISA and microarray analysis and correlation with indenoisoquinoline sensitivity. Mol Cancer Ther 8:1878–84, Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2728499&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 3 Oct 2013PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Humana Press DNA Topoisomerase and cancer 2011. Press H, editor, Pommier YGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stougaard M, Lohmann J, Mancino A, Celik S, Andersen FF, Koch J et al (2008) Single-molecule detection of human topoisomerase I cleavage− ligation activity. ACS Nano 3:223–33, http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/ 10.1021/nn800509b. Accessed Sep 18 2014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ho Y, Grigsby C, Zhao F, Leong K (2011) Tuning physical properties of nanocomplexes through microfluidics-assisted confinement. Nano Lett 11:2178–82, http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/ 10.1021/nl200862n. Accessed 6 May 2014PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Juul S, Nielsen CJF, Labouriau R, Roy A, Tesauro C, Jensen PW et al (2012) Droplet micro fluidics platform for highly sensitive and quantitative detection of malaria-causing plasmodium parasites based on enzyme activity measurement. ACS Nano 6:10676–83. http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/nn3038594
  8. 8.
    Tesauro C, Juul S, Arnò B, Nielsen CJF, Fiorani P, Frøhlich RF (2012) Specific detection of topoisomerase i from the malaria causing P. falciparum parasite using isothermal rolling circle amplification. Conf. IEEE EMBS San Diego, CA, USA, 28 Aug–1 Sept 2012, pp 2416–2419. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=6346451. Accessed 6 May 2014
  9. 9.
    Bonven BJ, Gocke E, Westergaard O (1985) A high affinity topoisomerase I binding sequence is clustered at DNAase I hypersensitive sites in Tetrahymena R-chromatin. Cell 41:541–51, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2985282CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Qin D, Xia Y, Whitesides GM (2010) Soft lithography for micro- and nanoscale patterning. Nat Protoc 5:491–502, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20203666. Accessed 29 Apr 2014CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9:671–675, http://www.nature.com/doifinder/ 10.1038/nmeth.2089. Accessed 28 Apr 2014CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bai Y, He X, Liu D, Patil SN, Bratton D, Huebner A et al (2010) A double droplet trap system for studying mass transport across a droplet-droplet interface. Lab Chip 10:1281–5, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20445881. Accessed 17 Nov 2014CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Huebner A, Bratton D, Whyte G, Yang M, Demello AJ, Abell C et al (2009) Static microdroplet arrays: a microfluidic device for droplet trapping, incubation and release for enzymatic and cell-based assays. Lab Chip 9:692–698, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19224019. Accessed 31 Oct 2014CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chiu Y-L, Chan HF, Phua KKL, Zhang Y, Juul S, Knudsen BR et al (2014) Synthesis of fluorosurfactants for emulsion-based biological applications. ACS Nano 8:3913–20, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24646088PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cinzia Tesauro
    • 1
  • Rikke Frøhlich
    • 1
  • Magnus Stougaard
    • 2
  • Yi-Ping Ho
    • 3
  • Birgitta R. Knudsen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Molecular Biology and GeneticsAarhus UniversityAarhus CDenmark
  2. 2.Department of PathologyAarhus University HospitalAarhusDenmark
  3. 3.Interdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNANO)Aarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark

Personalised recommendations