Epistasis pp 327-346

Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1253) | Cite as

Epistasis Analysis Using Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

Here we introduce artificial intelligence (AI) methodology for detecting and characterizing epistasis in genetic association studies. The ultimate goal of our AI strategy is to analyze genome-wide genetics data as a human would using sources of expert knowledge as a guide. The methodology presented here is based on computational evolution, which is a type of genetic programming. The ability to generate interesting solutions while at the same time learning how to solve the problem at hand distinguishes computational evolution from other genetic programming approaches. We provide a general overview of this approach and then present a few examples of its application to real data.

Key words

Epistasis Machine learning Artificial intelligence Association studies Genetic analysis Gene–gene interaction Genetic programming 

References

  1. 1.
    Moore JH (2003) The ubiquitous nature of epistasis in determining susceptibility to common human diseases. Hum Hered 56:73–82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moore JH (2005) A global view of epistasis. Nat Genet 37:13–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Moore JH, Williams SM (2005) Traversing the conceptual divide between biological and statistical epistasis: systems biology and a more modern synthesis. BioEssays 27:637–646PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Moore JH, Williams SM (2009) Epistasis and its implications for personal genetics. Am J Hum Genet 85:309–320PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Moore JH, Asselbergs FW, Williams SM (2010) Bioinformatics challenges for genome-wide association studies. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 26:445–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cordell HJ (2002) Epistasis: what it means, what it doesn’t mean, and statistical methods to detect it in humans. Hum Mol Genet 11:2463–2468PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cowper-Sal lari R, Cole MD, Karagas MR et al (2011) Layers of epistasis: genome-wide regulatory networks and network approaches to genome-wide association studies. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med 3:513–526PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tyler AL, Asselbergs FW, Williams SM et al (2009) Shadows of complexity: what biological networks reveal about epistasis and pleiotropy. BioEssays 31:220–227PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Phillips PC (2008) Epistasis—the essential role of gene interactions in the structure and evolution of genetic systems. Nat Rev Genet 9:855–867PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Phillips PC (1998) The language of gene interaction. Genetics 149:1167–1171PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ritchie MD, Hahn LW, Roodi N et al (2001) Multifactor-dimensionality reduction reveals high-order interactions among estrogen-metabolism genes in sporadic breast cancer. Am J Hum Genet 69:138–147PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ritchie MD, Hahn LW, Moore JH (2003) Power of multifactor dimensionality reduction for detecting gene-gene interactions in the presence of genotyping error, missing data, phenocopy, and genetic heterogeneity. Genet Epidemiol 24:150–157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hahn LW, Ritchie MD, Moore JH (2003) Multifactor dimensionality reduction software for detecting gene-gene and gene-environment interactions. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 19:376–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hahn LW, Moore JH (2004) Ideal discrimination of discrete clinical endpoints using multilocus genotypes. In Silico Biol 4:183–194PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moore JH, Gilbert JC, Tsai C-T et al (2006) A flexible computational framework for detecting, characterizing, and interpreting statistical patterns of epistasis in genetic studies of human disease susceptibility. J Theor Biol 241:252–261PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    McKinney BA, Reif DM, Ritchie MD et al (2006) Machine learning for detecting gene-gene interactions: a review. Appl Bioinformatics 5:77–88PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Eichler EE, Flint J, Gibson G et al (2010) Missing heritability and strategies for finding the underlying causes of complex disease. Nat Rev Genet 11:446–450PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Manolio TA, Collins FS, Cox NJ et al (2009) Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases. Nature 461:747–753PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Koza JR (1992) Genetic programming: on the programming of computers by means of natural selection. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Banzhaf W, Francone FD, Keller RE et al (1998) Genetic programming: an introduction: on the automatic evolution of computer programs and its applications. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
  22. 22.
    Fogel G, Corne D (2003) Evolutionary computation in bioinformatics. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, BostonGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ritchie MD, White BC, Parker JS et al (2003) Optimization of neural network architecture using genetic programming improves detection and modeling of gene-gene interactions in studies of human diseases. BMC Bioinformatics 4:28PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ritchie MD, Motsinger AA, Bush WS et al (2007) Genetic programming neural networks: a powerful bioinformatics tool for human genetics. Appl Soft Comput 7:471–479PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jason Moore BW (2007) Genome-wide genetic analysis using genetic programming: the critical need for expert knowledge. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 11–28Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Moore JH, Barney N, Tsai C-T et al (2007) Symbolic modeling of epistasis. Hum Hered 63:120–133PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Turner SD, Dudek SM, Ritchie MD (2010) ATHENA: a knowledge-based hybrid backpropagation-grammatical evolution neural network algorithm for discovering epistasis among quantitative trait Loci. BioData Min 3:5PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Banzhaf W, Beslon G, Christensen S et al (2006) Guidelines: from artificial evolution to computational evolution: a research agenda. Nat Rev Genet 7:729–735PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Moore JH, Greene CS, Andrews PC et al (2009) Does complexity matter? Artificial evolution, computational evolution and the genetic analysis of epistasis in common human diseases, genetic programming theory and practice VI. Springer, USA, pp 1–19Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Moore JH, Andrews PC, Barney N et al (2008) Development and evaluation of an open-ended computational evolution system for the genetic analysis of susceptibility to common human diseases. In: Marchiori E, Moore JH (eds) Evolutionary computation, machine learning and data mining in bioinformatics. Springer, Berlin, pp 129–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pattin KA, Payne JL, Hill DP et al (2011) Exploiting expert knowledge of protein-protein interactions in a computational evolution system for detecting epistasis. In: Riolo R, McConaghy T, Vladislavleva E (eds) Genetic programming theory and practice VIII. Springer, New York, pp 195–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Greene CS, Hill DP, Moore JH (2010) Environmental sensing of expert knowledge in a computational evolution system for complex problem solving in human genetics. In: Riolo R, O’Reilly U-M, McConaghy T (eds) Genetic programming theory and practice VII. Springer, USA, pp 19–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Moore JH, Hill DP, Fisher JM et al (2011) Human-computer interaction in a computational evolution system for the genetic analysis of cancer. In: Riolo R, Vladislavleva E, Moore JH (eds) Genetic programming theory and practice IX. Springer, New York, pp 153–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Moore JH, Hill DP, Sulovari A et al (2013) Genetic analysis of prostate cancer using computational evolution, pareto-optimization and post-processing. In: Riolo R, Vladislavleva E, Ritchie MD et al (eds) Genetic programming theory and practice X. Springer, New York, pp 87–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Payne JL, Greene CS, Hill DP et al (2010) Sensible initialization of a computational evolution system using expert knowledge for epistasis analysis in human genetics. In: Chen Y (ed) Exploitation of linkage learning in evolutionary algorithms. Springer, Berlin, pp 215–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Greene CS, Hill DP, Moore JH (2011) An open-ended computational evolution strategy for evolving parsimonious solutions to human genetics problems. In: Kampis G, Karsai I, Szathmáry E (eds) Advances in artificial life. Darwin meets von Neumann. Springer, Berlin, pp 313–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Goldberg DE (2002) Building blocks, the design of innovation. Springer, USA, pp 59–69Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Goldberg DE (2002) Design of competent genetic algorithms, the design of innovation. Springer, USA, pp 187–216Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Pattin KA, Moore JH (2010) Genome-wide association studies for the identification of biomarkers in metabolic diseases. Expert Opin Med Diagn 4:39–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Pattin KA, Moore JH (2008) Exploiting the proteome to improve the genome-wide genetic analysis of epistasis in common human diseases. Hum Genet 124:19–29PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Pattin KA, Moore JH (2009) Role for protein-protein interaction databases in human genetics. Expert Rev Proteomics 6:647–659PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Moore JH, Parker JS, Olsen NJ et al (2002) Symbolic discriminant analysis of microarray data in autoimmune disease. Genet Epidemiol 23:57–69PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Velez DR, White BC, Motsinger AA et al (2007) A balanced accuracy function for epistasis modeling in imbalanced datasets using multifactor dimensionality reduction. Genet Epidemiol 31:306–315PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Folino G,Pizzuti C, Spezzano G (1999) A cellular genetic programming approach to classification. Proc. of the genetic and evolutionary computation conference GECCO99. Morgan Kaufmann. pp. 1015–1020Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Vladislavleva E, Smits G, Kotanchek M (2008) Better solutions faster: soft evolution of robust regression models in pareto genetic programming. In: Riolo R, Soule T, Worzel B (eds) Genetic programming theory and practice V. Springer, USA, pp 13–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Moore JH (2003) Cross validation consistency for the assessment of genetic programming results in microarray studies. In: Cagnoni S, Johnson CG, Cardalda JJR et al (eds) Applications of evolutionary computing. Springer, Berlin, pp 99–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Horn J, Nafpliotis N, Goldberg DE (1994) A niched Pareto genetic algorithm for multiobjective optimization. Proceedings of the first IEEE conference on evolutionary computation, 1994. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence, vol. 1. pp. 82–87Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Smits GF, Kotanchek M (2005) Pareto-front exploitation in symbolic regression. In: O’Reilly U-M, Yu T, Riolo R et al (eds) Genetic programming theory and practice II. Springer, New York, pp 283–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Coello CAC, Lamont GB, Veldhuisen DAV (2007) Evolutionary algorithms for solving multi-objective problems. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Greene CS, White BC, Moore JH (2009) sensible initialization using expert knowledge for genome-wide analysis of epistasis using genetic programming, genetic and evolutionary computation conference: [proceedings]/sponsored by ACM SIGEVO. Genet Evol Comput Conf 2009:1289–1296PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Moore JH, Hill DP, Saykin AJ et al (2014) Exploiting interestingness in a computational evolution system for the genome-wide genetic analysis of Alzheimer’s disease. In: Kotanchek M, Riolo R, Moore J (eds) Genetic programming theory and practice XI. Springer, USA, pp 31–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Fan R, Zhong M, Wang S et al (2011) Entropy-based information gain approaches to detect and to characterize gene-gene and gene-environment interactions/correlations of complex diseases. Genet Epidemiol 35:706–721PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Hu T, Sinnott-Armstrong NA, Kiralis JW et al (2011) Characterizing genetic interactions in human disease association studies using statistical epistasis networks. BMC Bioinformatics 12:364PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Hu T, Chen Y, Kiralis JW et al (2013) An information-gain approach to detecting three-way epistatic interactions in genetic association studies. J Am Med Inform Assoc 20(4):630–636PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Geng L, Hamilton HJ (2006) Interestingness measures for data mining: a survey. ACM Comput Surv 38(3), 5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Thomas JJ, Cook KA, National Visualization and Analytics Center (2005) Illuminating the path. IEEE Computer Society, Los AlamitosGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Heer J, Bostock M, Ogievetsky V (2010) A tour through the visualization zoo. Commun ACM 53:59–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Moore JH, Lari RCS, Hill D, et al (2011) Human microbiome visualization using 3d technology. Pac Symp Biocomput: 154–164Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    G.S. Hornby (2006) ALPS: The age-layered population structure for reducing the problem of premature convergence. Proceedings of the 8th annual conference on genetic and evolutionary computation, ACM, New York, NY, USA. pp. 815–822Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Bertram L, McQueen MB, Mullin K et al (2007) Systematic meta-analyses of Alzheimer disease genetic association studies: the AlzGene database. Nat Genet 39:17–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Robnik-Šikonja M, Kononenko I (2003) Theoretical and empirical analysis of ReliefF and RReliefF. Mach Learn 53:23–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K et al (2007) PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet 81:559–575PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Moore JH, Greene CS, Hill DP, Saykin AJ et al (2014) Identification of novel genetic models of glaucoma using the EMERGENT genetic programming-based artificial intelligence system. In: Riolo R, Kotanchek M, Worzel W (eds) Genetic programming theory and practice XII. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeneticsGeisel School of Medicine, DHMCLebanonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Community and Family MedicineGeisel School of Medicine, DHMCLebanonUSA

Personalised recommendations