The isolation of nuclei from eukaryotic cells is essential for studying the composition and the dynamic changes of the nuclear proteome to gain insight into the mechanisms of gene expression and cell signalling. Primary cells are particularly challenging for standard nuclear isolation protocols due to low protein content, sample degradation, or nuclear clumping. Here, we describe a rapid and flexible protocol for the isolation of clean and intact nuclei, which results in the recovery of 90–95 % highly pure nuclei. The method, called lysis gradient centrifugation (LGC), is based on an iso-osmolar discontinuous iodixanol-based density gradient including a detergent-containing lysis layer. A single low g-force centrifugation step enables mild cell lysis and prevents extensive contact of the nuclei with the cytoplasmic environment. This fast method shows high reproducibility due to the relatively little cell manipulation required by the investigator. Further advantages are the low amount of starting material required, easy parallel processing of multiple samples, and isolation of nuclei and cytoplasm at the same time from the same sample.
Nuclear isolation Mild lysis Fractionation Single step Discontinuous density gradient
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Springer Nature is developing a new tool to find and evaluate Protocols. Learn more
We would like to thank Werner Poglitsch for technical support in initial experiments.
Graham JM, Rickwood D (1997) Subcellular fractionation. A practical approach. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Graham J, Ford T, Rickwood D (1994) The preparation of subcellular organelles from mouse liver in self-generated gradients of iodixanol. Anal Biochem 220:367–373PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blobel G, Potter VR (1966) Nuclei from rat liver: isolation method that combines purity with high yield. Science 154:1662–1665PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rio DC, Ares M Jr., Hannon GJ et al (2010) Preparation of cytoplasmic and nuclear rna from tissue culture cells. Cold Spring Harb Protoc pdb.prot5441Google Scholar
Graham JM (2001) Isolation of nuclei and nuclear membranes from animal tissues. Curr Protoc Cell Biol Chapter 3:Unit 3.10Google Scholar
Barta CA, Sachs-Barrable K, Feng F et al (2008) Effects of monoglycerides on P-glycoprotein: modulation of the activity and expression in Caco-2 cell monolayers. Mol Pharm 5:863–875PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valenzuela SM, Martin DK, Por SB et al (1997) Molecular cloning and expression of a chloride ion channel of cell nuclei. J Biol Chem 272:12575–12582PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg DE, Kornfeld S (1983) Evidence for extensive subcellular organization of asparagin-linked oligosaccharide processing and lysosomal enzyme phosphorylation. J Biol Chem 258:3159–3165PubMedGoogle Scholar
Dyer RB, Herzog NK (1995) Isolation of intact nuclear extract preparation from a fragile B-lymphocyte cell line. Biotechniques 19:192–195PubMedGoogle Scholar
Ford T, Graham J, Rickwood D (1994) Iodixanol: a nonionic iso-osmotic centrifugation medium for the formation of self-generated gradients. Anal Biochem 220:360–366PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poglitsch M, Katholnig K, Saemann MD et al (2011) Rapid isolation of nuclei from living immune cells by a single centrifugation through a multifunctional lysis gradient. J Immunol Meth 373:167–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cimini AM, Moreno S, Giorgi M, Serafini B, Ceru MP (1993) Purification of peroxisomal fraction from rat brain. Neurochem Int 23(3):249–260Google Scholar
Graham JM (2001) Purification of a crude mitochondrial fraction by density-gradient centrifugation. Curr Protoc Cell Biol Chapter 3, Unit 3.4. doi:10.1002/0471143030.cb0304s04Google Scholar