Plasmodesmata pp 137-148

Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1217) | Cite as

Quantification of Plant Cell Coupling with Live-Cell Microscopy

Protocol

Abstract

Movement of nutrients and signaling compounds from cell to cell is an essential process for plant growth and development. To understand processes such as carbon allocation, cell communication, and reaction to pathogen attack it is important to know a specific molecule’s capacity to pass a specific cell wall interface. Transport through plasmodesmata, the cell wall channels that directly connect plant cells, is regulated not only by a fixed size exclusion limit, but also by physiological and pathological adaptation. The noninvasive approach described here offers the possibility of precisely determining the plasmodesmata-mediated cell wall permeability for small molecules in living cells.

The method is based on photoactivation of the fluorescent tracer caged fluorescein. Non-fluorescent caged fluorescein is applied to a target tissue, where it is taken up passively into all cells. Imaged by confocal microscopy, loaded tracer is activated by UV illumination in a target cell and its spread to neighboring cells monitored. When combined with high-speed acquisition by resonant scanning or spinning disc confocal microscopy, the high signal-to-noise ratio of photoactivation allows collection of three-dimensional (3D) time series. These contain all necessary functional and anatomical data to measure cell coupling in complex tissues noninvasively.

Key words

Plasmodesmata Live-cell microscopy Fluorescent tracer Diffusion Fluorescein Permeability 

References

  1. 1.
    Roberts AG, Oparka KJ (2003) Plasmodesmata and the control of symplastic transport. Plant Cell Environ 26:103–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kim I, Kobayashi K, Cho E, Zambryski PC (2005) Subdomains for transport via plasmodesmata corresponding to the apical-basal axis are established during Arabidopsis embryogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 11945–11950PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liesche J, Schulz A (2012) In vivo quantification of cell coupling in plants with different phloem-loading strategies. Plant Physiol 159: 355–365PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liesche J, Schulz A (2013) Modeling the parameters for plasmodesmal sugar filtering in active symplasmic phloem loaders. Front Plant Sci 4:207PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Patrick JW (2013) Does Don Fisher’s high-pressure manifold model account for phloem transport and resource partitioning? Front Plant Sci 4:184PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bret-Harte MS, Silk WK (1994) Nonvascular, symplasmic diffusion of sucrose cannot satisfy the carbon demands of growth in the primary root tip of Zea mays L. Plant Physiol 105: 19–33PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rutschow HL, Baskin TI, Kramer EM (2011) Regulation of solute flux through plasmodesmata in the root meristem. Plant Physiol 155: 1817–1826PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schulz A (1995) Plasmodesmal widening accompanies the short-term increase in symplasmic phloem unloading in pea root-tips under osmotic-stress. Protoplasma 188:22–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Terry BR, Robards AW (1987) Hydrodynamic radius alone governs the mobility of molecules through plasmodesmata. Planta 171:145–157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goodwin PB, Shepherd V, Erwee MG (1990) Compartmentation of fluorescent tracers injected into the epidermal-cells of Egeria densa leaves. Planta 181:129–136PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Martens HJ, Hansen M, Schulz A (2004) Caged probes: a novel tool in studying symplasmic transport in plant tissues. Protoplasma 223:63–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kim JY, Yuan Z, Cilia M, Khalfan-Jagani Z, Jackson D (2002) Intercellular trafficking of a KNOTTED1 green fluorescent protein fusion in the leaf and shoot meristem of Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:4103–4108PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kurata T, Ishida T, Kawabata-Awai C, Noguchi M, Hattori S, Sano R et al (2005) Cell-to-cell movement of the CAPRICE protein in Arabidopsis root epidermal cell differentiation. Development 132:5387–5398PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Itaya A, Ma F, Qi Y, Matsuda Y, Zhu Y, Liang G et al (2002) Plasmodesma-mediated selective protein traffic between “symplasmically isolated” cells probed by a viral movement protein. Plant Cell 14:2071–2083PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ding B, Turgeon R, Parthasarathy MV (1992) Substructure of freeze-substituted plasmodesmata. Protoplasma 169:28–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brecknock S, Dibbayawan TP, Vesk M, Vesk PA, Faulkner C, Barton DA, Overall RL (2011) High resolution scanning electron microscopy of plasmodesmata. Planta 234:749–758PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tucker EB, Spanswick RM (1985) Translocation in the staminal hairs of Setcreasea purpurea. kinetics of intercellular transport. Protoplasma 128:167–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Oparka KJ, Duckett CM, Prior DM, Fisher DB (1994) Real-time imaging of phloem unloading in the root-tip of Arabidopsis. Plant J 6: 759–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Turgeon R, Wolf S (2009) Phloem transport: cellular pathways and molecular trafficking. Annu Rev Plant Biol 60:207–221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Liesche J, Schulz A (2012) Quantification of plant cell coupling with three-dimensional photoactivation microscopy. J Microsc 247:2–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lee HM, Larson DR, Lawrence DS (2009) Illuminating the chemistry of life: design, synthesis, and applications of “caged” and related photoresponsive compounds. ACS Chem Biol 4:409–427PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sowinski at conference “PD 2010”, Sydney, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gjetting KS, Ytting CK, Schulz A, Fuglsang AT (2012) Live imaging of intra- and extracellular pH in plants using pHusion, a novel genetically encoded biosensor. J Exp Bot 63:3207–3218PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Froelich DR, Mullendore DL, Jensen KH, Ross-Elliott TJ, Anstead JA, Thompson GA et al (2011) Phloem ultrastructure and pressure flow: sieve-element-occlusion-related agglomerations do not affect translocation. Plant Cell 23:4428–4445PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Grossmann G, Guo WJ, Ehrhardt DW, Frommer WB, Sit RV, Quake SR et al (2011) The RootChip: an integrated microfluidic chip for plant science. Plant Cell 23:4234–4240PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schulz A (1994) Phloem transport and differential unloading in pea-seedlings after source and sink manipulations. Planta 192:239–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Liarzi O, Epel BL (2005) Development of a quantitative tool for measuring changes in the coefficient of conductivity of plasmodesmata induced by developmental, biotic, and abiotic signals. Protoplasma 225:67–76PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Plant and Environmental SciencesUniversity of CopenhagenFrederiksbergDenmark

Personalised recommendations