Advertisement

A Standardized Protocol for the In Vitro Comet-Based DNA Repair Assay

  • Jana SlyskovaEmail author
  • Sabine A. S. Langie
  • Isabel Gaivão
  • Andrew R. Collins
  • Amaya Azqueta
Protocol
Part of the Methods in Pharmacology and Toxicology book series (MIPT)

Abstract

DNA repair is regarded as an important biomarker to be measured alongside DNA damage when considering the risk of cancer from environmental or genetic causes. Efficient repair deals with DNA lesions before they can disrupt replication and create mutations. Repair capacity can be readily assessed using an in vitro comet-based DNA repair assay, which is particularly useful in human biomonitoring studies where many samples are collected over an extended period, stored frozen, and analyzed at a later date. In this assay, a protein lysate is extracted from studied cells or tissues and is incubated with damage-containing substrate DNA. Repair proteins in extract are able to recognize and incise DNA lesions and cumulate DNA breaks, which are quantified with the comet assay. Here we provide detailed protocols for the in vitro estimation of base excision repair (on a substrate containing 8-oxoguanine induced by visible light in the presence of a photosensitizer) and nucleotide excision repair (with UV-induced pyrimidine dimers and 6-4 photoproducts as substrate). We describe the preparation of extracts from different kinds of source material (cultured cells, peripheral blood mononuclear cells, animal tissues, human biopsies) and emphasize the need for careful control of the extract concentration. Furthermore, we discuss not only conventional comet assay format (2 gels on microscope slide), but also a medium-throughput version (12 minigels in microscope slide), which is recommended for reduction of experimental variability.

Key words

DNA repair Base excision repair Nucleotide excision repair Comet assay Biomonitoring 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Ro 19-8022 was kindly provided by Hoffman la Roche. SL was supported by a postdoctoral grant from the AXA Research Fund. AA thanks the Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia (“Juan de la Cierva” programme, 2009) of the Spanish Government for personal support. IG thanks the Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation (FCT) under the Project PEst-OE/AGR/UI0772/2014.

References

  1. 1.
    Collins AR, Fleming IM, Gedik CM (1994) In vitro repair of oxidative and ultraviolet-induced DNA damage in supercoiled nucleoid DNA by human cell extract. Biochim Biophys Acta 1219(3):724–727PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Collins AR, Dusinska M, Horvathova E et al (2001) Inter-individual differences in repair of DNA base oxidation, measured in vitro with the comet assay. Mutagenesis 16(4):297–301PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Langie SA, Knaapen AM, Brauers KJ et al (2006) Development and validation of a modified comet assay to phenotypically assess nucleotide excision repair. Mutagenesis 21(2):153–158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gaivao I, Piasek A, Brevik A et al (2009) Comet assay-based methods for measuring DNA repair in vitro; estimates of inter- and intra-individual variation. Cell Biol Toxicol 25(1):45–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Langie SA, Cameron KM, Waldron KJ et al (2011) Measuring DNA repair incision activity of mouse tissue extracts towards singlet oxygen-induced DNA damage: a comet-based in vitro repair assay. Mutagenesis 26(3):461–471PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Langie SA, Kowalczyk P, Tudek B et al (2010) The effect of oxidative stress on nucleotide-excision repair in colon tissue of newborn piglets. Mutat Res 695(1–2):75–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Slyskova J, Korenkova V, Collins AR et al (2012) Functional, genetic, and epigenetic aspects of base and nucleotide excision repair in colorectal carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res 18(21):5878–5887PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Azqueta A, Langie SA, Slyskova J et al (2013) Measurement of DNA base and nucleotide excision repair activities in mammalian cells and tissues using the comet assay: a methodological overview. DNA Repair 12(11):1007–1010PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Collins AR, Oscoz AA, Brunborg G et al (2008) The comet assay: topical issues. Mutagenesis 23(3):143–151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Forchhammer L, Johansson C, Loft S et al (2009) Variation in the measurement of DNA damage by comet assay measured by the ECVAG inter-laboratory validation trial. Mutagenesis 25(2):113–123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Langie SA, Wilms LC, Hamalainen S et al (2010) Modulation of nucleotide excision repair in human lymphocytes by genetic and dietary factors. Br J Nutr 103(4):490–501PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Godschalk RW, Ersson C, Riso P et al (2013) DNA-repair measurements by use of the modified comet assay: an inter-laboratory comparison within the European Comet Assay Validation Group (ECVAG). Mutat Res 757(1):60–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shaposhnikov S, Azqueta A, Henriksson S et al (2010) Twelve-gel slide format optimised for comet assay and fluorescent in situ hybridisation. Toxicol Lett 195(1):31–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Azqueta A, Gutzkov KB, Priestley CC et al (2013) A comparative performance test of standard, medium- and high-throughput comet assays. Toxicol In Vitro 27(2):768–773PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Collins AR, Azqueta A (2012) DNA repair as a biomarker in human biomonitoring studies; further applications of the comet assay. Mutat Res 736(1–2):122–129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Guarnieri S, Loft S, Riso P et al (2008) DNA repair phenotype and dietary antioxidant supplementation. Br J Nutr 99(5):1018–1024PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brevik A, Karlsen A, Azqueta A et al (2011) Both base excision repair and nucleotide excision repair in humans are influenced by nutritional factors. Cell Biochem Funct 29(1):36–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Collins AR, Harrington V, Drew J et al (2003) Nutritional modulation of DNA repair in a human intervention study. Carcinogenesis 24(3):511–515PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Caple F, Williams EA, Spiers A et al (2010) Inter-individual variation in DNA damage and base excision repair in young, healthy non-smokers: effects of dietary supplementation and genotype. Br J Nutr 103(11):1585–1593PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Riso P, Martini D, Moller P et al (2010) DNA damage and repair activity after broccoli intake in young healthy smokers. Mutagenesis 25(6):595–602PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Slyskova J, Lorenzo Y, Karlsen A et al (2014) Both genetic and dietary factors underlie differences in DNA damage levels and DNA repair capacity. DNA repair 16:66–73Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Langie SA, Achterfeldt S, Gorniak JP et al (2013) Maternal folate depletion and high-fat feeding from weaning affects DNA methylation and DNA repair in brain of adult offspring. FASEB J 27(8):3323–3334PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Collins AR, Azqueta A, Langie SA (2012) Effects of micronutrients on DNA repair. Eur J Nutr 51(3):261–279PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dusinska M, Collins A, Kazimirova A et al (2004) Genotoxic effects of asbestos in humans. Mutat Res 553(1–2):91–102PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dusinska M, Barancokova M, Kazimirova A et al (2004) Does occupational exposure to mineral fibres cause DNA or chromosome damage? Mutat Res 553(1–2):103–110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vodicka P, Koskinen M, Stetina R et al (2003) The role of various biomarkers in the evaluation of styrene genotoxicity. Cancer Detect Prev 27(4):275–284PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hanova M, Vodickova L, Vaclavikova R et al (2011) DNA damage, DNA repair rates and mRNA expression levels of cell cycle genes (TP53, p21(CDKN1A), BCL2 and BAX) with respect to occupational exposure to styrene. Carcinogenesis 32(1):74–79PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hanova M, Stetina R, Vodickova L et al (2011) Modulation of DNA repair capacity and mRNA expression levels of XRCC1, hOGG1 and XPC genes in styrene-exposed workers. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 248(3):194–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Vodicka P, Koskinen M, Naccarati A et al (2006) Styrene metabolism, genotoxicity, and potential carcinogenicity. Drug Metab Rev 38(4):805–853PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Slyskova J, Dusinska M, Kuricova M et al (2007) Relationship between the capacity to repair 8-oxoguanine, biomarkers of genotoxicity and individual susceptibility in styrene-exposed workers. Mutat Res 634(1–2):101–111PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Vodicka P, Kumar R, Stetina R et al (2004) Markers of individual susceptibility and DNA repair rate in workers exposed to xenobiotics in a tire plant. Environ Mol Mutagen 44(4):283–292PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sliwinski T, Czechowska A, Szemraj J et al (2008) STI571 reduces NER activity in BCR/ABL-expressing cells. Mutat Res 654(2):162–167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hoeijmakers JH (2001) Genome maintenance mechanisms for preventing cancer. Nature 411(6835):366–374PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Slyskova J, Naccarati A, Pardini B et al (2012) Differences in nucleotide excision repair capacity between newly diagnosed colorectal cancer patients and healthy controls. Mutagenesis 27(2):225–232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Herrera M, Dominguez G, Garcia JM et al (2009) Differences in repair of DNA cross-links between lymphocytes and epithelial tumor cells from colon cancer patients measured in vitro with the comet assay. Clin Cancer Res 15(17):5466–5472PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Collins A, Anderson D, Coskun E et al (2012) Launch of the ComNet (comet network) project on the comet assay in human population studies during the International Comet Assay Workshop meeting in Kusadasi, Turkey (September 13–16, 2011). Mutagenesis 27(4):2CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jana Slyskova
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sabine A. S. Langie
    • 2
  • Isabel Gaivão
    • 3
  • Andrew R. Collins
    • 4
  • Amaya Azqueta
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Molecular Biology of CancerInstitute of Experimental Medicine ASCRPragueCzech Republic
  2. 2.Environmental Risk and Health UnitFlemish Institute of Technological Research (VITO)MolBelgium
  3. 3.Department of Genetics and BiotechnologyCECAV, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto DouroVila RealPortugal
  4. 4.Department of NutritionUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
  5. 5.Department of Pharmacology and ToxicologyUniversity of NavarraPamplonaSpain

Personalised recommendations