Directed Evolution Library Creation pp 225-244

Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1179) | Cite as

ITCHY: Incremental Truncation for the Creation of Hybrid Enzymes

Protocol

Abstract

Incremental Truncation for the Creation of Hybrid enzYmes (ITCHY) is a directed evolution technique for randomly recombining two genes. The chief advantage of ITCHY is that there is no requirement for the two genes to share any sequence similarity. This distinguishes ITCHY from directed evolution methods that are based on homologous recombination, such as DNA shuffling. In ITCHY, Escherichia coli exonuclease III is used to incrementally truncate one of the parental genes from its 3′ end and the other from its 5′ end. Ligation of the randomly truncated gene fragments yields a combinatorial library of chimeras. In this chapter, we provide detailed protocols for constructing libraries using both the user-friendly thio-ITCHY method and also time-dependent incremental truncation. We illustrate the protocols with the data that we obtained when we recombined two alcohol dehydrogenase genes that only share 47 % sequence identity.

Key words

Incremental truncation Exonuclease III Nonhomologous recombination Protein engineering Thio-ITCHY Time-dependent truncation 

References

  1. 1.
    Lutz S, Patrick WM (2004) Novel methods for directed evolution of enzymes: quality, not quantity. Curr Opin Biotechnol 15:291–297PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ostermeier M, Shim JH, Benkovic SJ (1999) A combinatorial approach to hybrid enzymes independent of DNA homology. Nat Biotechnol 17:1205–1209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gerth ML, Lutz S (2007) Non-homologous recombination of deoxyribonucleoside kinases from human and Drosophila melanogaster yields human-like enzymes with novel activities. J Mol Biol 370:742–751PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eisenbeis S, Höcker B (2010) Evolutionary mechanism as a template for protein engineering. J Pept Sci 16:538–544PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lutz S, Ostermeier M, Benkovic SJ (2001) Rapid generation of incremental truncation libraries for protein engineering using α-phosphothioate nucleotides. Nucleic Acids Res 29:e16PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tarendeau F, Boudet J, Guilligay D, Mas PJ, Bougault CM, Boulo S, Baudin F, Ruigrok RW, Daigle N, Ellenberg J, Cusack S, Simorre JP, Hart DJ (2007) Structure and nuclear import function of the C-terminal domain of influenza virus polymerase PB2 subunit. Nat Struct Mol Biol 14:229–233PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gerth ML, Patrick WM, Lutz S (2004) A second-generation system for unbiased reading frame selection. Protein Eng Des Sel 17:595–602PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lutz S, Ostermeier M (2003) Preparation of SCRATCHY hybrid protein libraries: size- and in-frame selection of nucleic acid sequences. Methods Mol Biol 231:143–151PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    An Y, Yumerefendi H, Mas PJ, Chesneau A, Hart DJ (2011) ORF-selector ESPRIT: a second generation library screen for soluble protein expression employing precise open reading frame selection. J Struct Biol 175:189–197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ostermeier M, Lutz S (2003) The creation of ITCHY hybrid protein libraries. Methods Mol Biol 231:129–141PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hanahan D, Jessee J, Bloom FR (1991) Plasmid transformation of Escherichia coli and other bacteria. Methods Enzymol 204:63–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cheng S, Fockler C, Barnes WM, Higuchi R (1994) Effective amplification of long targets from cloned inserts and human genomic DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91:5695–5699PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hartman PS (1991) Transillumination can profoundly reduce transformation frequencies. Biotechniques 11:747–748PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Firth AE, Patrick WM (2005) Statistics of protein library construction. Bioinformatics 21:3314–3315PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Saraswat M, Grand RS, Patrick WM (2013) Desalting DNA by drop dialysis increases library size upon transformation. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 77:402–404PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hanson-Manful P, Patrick WM (2013) Construction and analysis of randomized protein-encoding libraries using error-prone PCR. Methods Mol Biol 996:251–267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hoheisel JD (1993) On the activities of Escherichia coli exonuclease III. Anal Biochem 209:238–246PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ostermeier M (2003) Theoretical distribution of truncation lengths in incremental truncation libraries. Biotechnol Bioeng 82:564–577PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiochemistryUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations