Cytokine Bioassays pp 125-135 | Cite as
Chemotactic Responses by Macrophages to a Directional Source of a Cytokine Delivered by a Micropipette
Abstract
Macrophages, which are organized throughout every tissue, represent a key component of the immune system and the recruitment of macrophages to specific sites is important in normal host defense. However, when inappropriately recruited macrophages may damage or destroy healthy tissue; this is seen in several autoimmune diseases such as arthritis. Many cytokines, including CSF-1 and chemokines, are often upregulated in inflamed tissues and can induce the directional migration of macrophages towards the highest concentration of the cytokine in a process called chemotaxis. Chemokines were first described as chemoattractant cytokines synthesized at sites of inflammation that stimulate the directional migration of leukocytes and mediate inflammation. Whereas specific receptors for chemoattractants reside over the entire cell surface, macrophages can detect very shallow chemotactic gradients leading to spatially defined responses to the chemoattractant such as the extension of directed protrusions leading to cell migration. In this chapter we describe a method for the localized delivery of chemoattractants via a micropipette needle to macrophages in culture followed by methods for imaging and an outline of quantifying macrophage responses.
Key words
Chemokines CSF-1 Chemotaxis Protrusions Migration MacrophageNotes
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by NIH grant GM071828.
References
- 1.Boyden S (1962) The chemotactic effect of mixtures of antibody and antigen on polymorphonuclear leucocytes. J Exp Med 115:453–466PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Wass JA, Varani J, Piontek GE et al (1981) Characteristics of the chemotactic factor-mediated cell swelling response of tumor cells. J Natl Cancer Inst 66:927–933PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 3.Zigmond SH (1977) Ability of polymorphonuclear leukocytes to orient in gradients of chemotactic factors. J Cell Biol 75:606–616PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Zicha D, Dunn GA, Brown AF (1991) A new direct-viewing chemotaxis chamber. J Cell Sci 99:769–775PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.Paguirigan AL, Beebe DJ (2008) Microfluidics meet cell biology: bridging the gap by validation and application of microscale techniques for cell biological assays. Bioessays 30:811–821PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Futrelle RP, Traut J, McKee WG (1982) Cell behavior in Dictyostelium discoideum: preaggregation response to localized cyclic AMP pulses. J Cell Biol 92:807–821PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Bailly M, Condeelis JS, Segall JE (1998) Chemoattractant-induced lamellipod extension. Microsc Res Tech 43:433–443PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Gerisch G, Keller HU (1981) Chemotactic reorientation of granulocytes stimulated with micropipettes containing fMet-Leu-Phe. J Cell Sci 52:1–10PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Vallier LG, Segall JE, Snyder M (2002) The alpha-factor receptor C-terminus is important for mating projection formation and orientation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 53:251–266PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Ishihara D, Dovas A, Park H et al (2012) The chemotactic defect in wiskott-Aldrich syndrome macrophages is due to the reduced persistence of directional protrusions. PLoS One 7(1):e30033PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Rasband WS (1997/2013) ImageJ. U. S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA, http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/
- 12.Meijering E, Dzyubachyk O, Smal I (2012) Methods for cell and particle tracking. Methods Enzymol 504:183–200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar