Selection of Reliable Reference Genes for RT-qPCR Analysis

  • Jan HellemansEmail author
  • Jo Vandesompele
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1160)


Reference genes have become the method of choice for normalization of qPCR data. It has been demonstrated in many studies that reference gene validation is essential to ensure accurate and reliable results. This chapter describes how a pilot study can be set up to identify the best set of reference genes to be used for normalization of qPCR data. The data from such a pilot study should be analyzed with dedicated algorithms such as geNorm to rank genes according to their stability—a measure for how well they are suited for normalization. geNorm also provides insights into the optimal number of reference genes and the overall quality of the selected set of reference genes. Importantly, these results are always in function of the sample type being studied. Guidelines are provided on the interpretation of the results from geNorm pilot studies as well as for the continued monitoring of reference gene quality in subsequent studies. For screening studies including a large, unbiased set of genes (e.g., complete miRNome) an alternative normalization method can be used: global mean normalization. This chapter also describes how the data from such studies can be used to identify reference genes for subsequent validation studies on smaller sets of selected genes.

Key words

qPCR Selection of reference genes Human candidate reference genes Candidate reference microRNAs geNorm 


  1. 1.
    Huggett J, Dheda K, Bustin S et al (2005) Real-time RT-PCR normalisation; strategies and considerations. Genes Immun 6:279–284PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F et al (2002). Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol 3:RESEARCH0034Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vandesompele J, Kubista M, Pfaffl MW (2009) Real-time PCR: current technology and applications. In: Logan J, Edwards K, Saunders N (eds) Caister Academic, Norfolk, England, pp 1–27Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hellemans J, Preobrazhenska O, Willaert A et al (2004) Loss-of-function mutations in LEMD3 result in osteopoikilosis, Buschke-Ollendorff syndrome and melorheostosis. Nat Genet 36: 1213–1218PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vermeulen J, De Preter K, Naranjo A et al (2009) Predicting outcomes for children with neuroblastoma using a multigene-expression signature: a retrospective SIOPEN/COG/GPOH study. Lancet Oncol 10:663–671PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mestdagh P, Van Vlierberghe P, De Weer A et al (2009) A novel and universal method for microRNA RT-qPCR data normalization. Genome Biol 10:R64PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barbara D, Mestdagh P, Hellemans J et al (2012) miRNA expression profiling: from reference genes to global mean normalization. Methods Mol Biol 822:261–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.BiogazelleZwijnaardeBelgium
  2. 2.Center for Medical GeneticsGhent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations