Abstract
Kupffer cells are the liver-resident macrophages lining the sinusoids and are mostly known for their role of scavengers, as crucial keepers of organ integrity. But due to the many fundamental functions of the liver notably linked to detoxication, metabolism, protein synthesis, or immunology, Kupffer cells are exposed to a dynamic environment and constantly adapt themselves by modulating their gene and protein expressions. In this context, the characterization of these cells at steady-state and upon challenges may be limited by the classical microscopy or flow cytometry which allow for the use of only few selected markers. On the other end, transcriptomic approach, although being very powerful, can be costly and time-consuming. So mass cytometry offers a good compromise, allowing for the monitoring of a representative set of markers (up to 40) in a simple experiment. Herein, we describe a straightforward experimental and analysis workflow for Kupffer cell characterization by mass cytometry.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bandura DR, Baranov VI, Ornatsky OI, Antonov A, Kinach R, Lou X, Pavlov S, Vorobiev S, Dick JE, Tanner SD (2009) Mass cytometry: technique for real time single cell multitarget immunoassay based on inductively coupled plasma time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 81(16):6813–6822. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac901049w
Lavin Y, Kobayashi S, Leader A, Amir ED, Elefant N, Bigenwald C, Remark R, Sweeney R, Becker CD, Levine JH, Meinhof K, Chow A, Kim-Shulze S, Wolf A, Medaglia C, Li H, Rytlewski JA, Emerson RO, Solovyov A, Greenbaum BD, Sanders C, Vignali M, Beasley MB, Flores R, Gnjatic S, Pe’er D, Rahman A, Amit I, Merad M (2017) Innate immune landscape in early lung adenocarcinoma by paired single-cell analyses. Cell 169(4):750–765.e717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.04.014
Simoni Y, Fehlings M, Kloverpris HN, McGovern N, Koo SL, Loh CY, Lim S, Kurioka A, Fergusson JR, Tang CL, Kam MH, Dennis K, Lim TKH, Fui ACY, Hoong CW, Chan JKY, Curotto de Lafaille M, Narayanan S, Baig S, Shabeer M, Toh SES, Tan HKK, Anicete R, Tan EH, Takano A, Klenerman P, Leslie A, Tan DSW, Tan IB, Ginhoux F, Newell EW (2017) Human innate lymphoid cell subsets possess tissue-type based heterogeneity in phenotype and frequency. Immunity 46(1):148–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2016.11.005
Guilliams M, Scott CL (2017) Does niche competition determine the origin of tissue-resident macrophages? Nat Rev Immunol 17(7):451–460. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri.2017.42
Bleriot C, Ginhoux F (2019) Understanding the heterogeneity of resident liver macrophages. Front Immunol 10:2694. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.02694
Sanyal A, Boyer T, Terrault N, Lindor K (2017) Zakim and Boyer’s hepatology. A textbook of liver disease, 7th edn. Elsevier
Halpern KB, Shenhav R, Matcovitch-Natan O, Toth B, Lemze D, Golan M, Massasa EE, Baydatch S, Landen S, Moor AE, Brandis A, Giladi A, Avihail AS, David E, Amit I, Itzkovitz S (2017) Single-cell spatial reconstruction reveals global division of labour in the mammalian liver. Nature 542(7641):352–356. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21065
Sumatoh HR, Teng KW, Cheng Y, Newell EW (2017) Optimization of mass cytometry sample cryopreservation after staining. Cytometry A 91(1):48–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.23014
Leipold MD, Maecker HT (2012) Mass cytometry: protocol for daily tuning and running cell samples on a CyTOF mass cytometer. J Vis Exp 69:e4398. https://doi.org/10.3791/4398
VanderMaaten L, Hinton G (2008) Visualizing data using t-SNE. J Mach Learn Res 9:2579–2605
Becht E, McInnes L, Healy J, Dutertre CA, Kwok IWH, Ng LG, Ginhoux F, Newell EW (2019) Dimensionality reduction for visualizing single-cell data using UMAP. Nat Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4314
Chen H, Lau MC, Wong MT, Newell EW, Poidinger M, Chen J (2016) Cytofkit: a bioconductor package for an integrated mass cytometry data analysis pipeline. PLoS Comput Biol 12(9):e1005112. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005112
Han G, Spitzer MH, Bendall SC, Fantl WJ, Nolan GP (2018) Metal-isotope-tagged monoclonal antibodies for high-dimensional mass cytometry. Nat Protoc 13(10):2121–2148. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-018-0016-7
Lai L, Ong R, Li J, Albani S (2015) A CD45-based barcoding approach to multiplex mass-cytometry (CyTOF). Cytometry A 87(4):369–374. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.22640
Hartmann FJ, Simonds EF, Bendall SC (2018) A universal live cell barcoding-platform for multiplexed human single cell analysis. Sci Rep 8(1):10770. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28791-2
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Blériot, C., Li, S., Kairi, M.F.B.M., Newell, E., Ginhoux, F. (2020). Kupffer Cell Characterization by Mass Cytometry. In: Aouadi, M., Azzimato, V. (eds) Kupffer Cells. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2164. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0704-6_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0704-6_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-0703-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-0704-6
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols