Advertisement

Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) for Bioprinting

  • Cormac D. FayEmail author
Protocol
  • 99 Downloads
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 2140)

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) printing of human tissues and organs has been an exciting area of research for almost three decades [Bonassar and Vacanti. J Cell Biochem. 72(Suppl 30–31):297–303 (1998)]. The primary goal of bioprinting, presently, is achieving printed constructs with the overarching aim toward fully functional tissues and organs. Technology, in hand with the development of bioinks, has been identified as the key to this success. As a result, the place of computer-aided systems (design and manufacturing—CAD/CAM) cannot be underestimated and plays a significant role in this area. Unlike many reviews in this field, this chapter focuses on the technology required for 3D bioprinting from an initial background followed by the exciting area of medical imaging and how it plays a role in bioprinting. Extraction and classification of tissue types from 3D scans is discussed in addition to modeling and simulation capabilities of scanned systems. After that, the necessary area of transferring the 3D model to the printer is explored. The chapter closes with a discussion of the current state-of-the-art and inherent challenges facing the research domain to achieve 3D tissue and organ printing.

Key words

Computer-aided Design Design Computer-aided Manufacturing CAD CAM 3D Bioprinting 

References

  1. 1.
    Bonassar LJ, Vacanti CA (1998) Tissue engineering: the first decade and beyond. J Cell Biochem 72(Suppl 30–31):297–303CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schulz A, Xu J, Zhu B et al (2017) Interactive design space exploration and optimization for CAD models. ACM Trans Graph 36:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kocovic P (2017) 3D printing and its impact on the production of fully functional components: emerging research and opportunities: emerging research and opportunities. IGI Global, HersheyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Larson MG, Bengzon F (2013) The finite element method: theory, implementation, and applications. Springer Science & Business Media, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sarcar MMM, Mallikarjuna Rao K, Lalit Narayan K (2008) Computer aided design and manufacturing. PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd., New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Derby B (2012) Printing and prototyping of tissues and scaffolds. Science 338:921–926CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Malda J, Visser J, Melchels FP et al (2013) 25th anniversary article: engineering hydrogels for biofabrication. Adv Mater 25:5011–5028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ozbolat IT, Hospodiuk M (2016) Current advances and future perspectives in extrusion-based bioprinting. Biomaterials 76:321–343CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Murphy SV, Atala A (2014) 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat Biotechnol 32:773–785CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sheldon DF, McTaggart W (1986) CAD/CAM: computer-aided design and manufacturing. Comput-Aided Eng J 3:34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Elanchezhian C, Shanmuga Sundar G (2007) Computer aided manufacturing. Firewall Media, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sutherland IE (1963) Sketchpad. In: Proceedings of the May 21–23, 1963, spring joint computer conference on—AFIPS ‘63 (Spring)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sutherland IE (1964) Sketchpad a man-machine graphical communication system. Simulation 2:R–3–R–20Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Williamson M (1986) The impact of CAD on aerospace design. Aircr Eng Aerosp Technol 58:17–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ross A, Loomis HH (1978) Computer Aided Design of Microprocessor-Based Systems. In: 15th Design Automation ConferenceGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Trivedi AV (1988) Impact of robotics and CAD/CAM on an industrial technology curriculum. In: Robotics and factories of the future ‘87. pp 803–806Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Krouse JK (1982) What every engineer should know about computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing: the CAD/CAM revolution. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Society of Manufacturing Engineers (1975) CAD/CAM and the computer revolution: selected papers from CAD/CAM I and CAD/CAM IIGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kapos T, Ashy LM, Gallucci GO et al (2009) Computer-aided design and computer-assisted manufacturing in prosthetic implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 24(Suppl):110–117PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Parkash H (2016) Digital dentistry: unraveling the mysteries of computer-aided design computer-aided manufacturing in prosthodontic rehabilitation. Contemp Clin Dent 7:289CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sajjad A (2016) Computer-assisted design/computer-assisted manufacturing systems: a revolution in restorative dentistry. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 16:96–99CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Finne H (1988) CAD/CAM and social science in Scandinavia. In: Social science research on CAD/CAM. pp 10–26Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Adler SW (2000) The Revolution of CAD/CAM in the Casting of Fine JewelryGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hull CW (1984) Apparatus for production of three-dimensional objects by stereolithography. US PatentGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bandyopadhyay A, Bose S (2015) Additive manufacturing. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Khorram Niaki M, Niaki MK, Nonino F (2017) What is additive manufacturing? Additive systems, processes and materials. In: springer series in Adv Manuf. pp 1–35Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wimpenny DI, Pandey PM, Jyothish Kumar L (2016) Advances in 3D printing & additive manufacturing technologies. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mannoor MS, Jiang Z, James T et al (2013) 3D printed bionic ears. Nano Lett 13:2634–2639CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Koprnicky J, Najman P, Safka J (2017) 3D printed bionic prosthetic hands. In: 2017 IEEE International Workshop of Electronics, Control, Measurement, Signals and their Application to Mechatronics (ECMSM)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Saunders CG, Foort J, Bannon M et al (1985) Computer aided design of prosthetic sockets for below-knee amputees. Prosthetics Orthot Int 9:17–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Baynes S (2016) Printable Prosthetics: The Design of a 3D Printed Swimming Prosthesis: a Thesis Submitted to the Victoria University of Wellington in Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of DesignGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Langer R, Vacanti J (1993) Tissue engineering. Science 260:920–926CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yang S, Leong KF, Du Z, Chua CK (2001) The design of scaffolds for use in tissue engineering. Part I. traditional factors. Tissue Eng 7:679–689CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Loh QL, Choong C (2013) Three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: role of porosity and pore size. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 19:485–502CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    An J, Teoh JEM, Suntornnond R, Chua CK (2015) Design and 3D printing of scaffolds and tissues. Proc Est Acad Sci Eng 1:261–268Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bártolo PJ, Chua CK, Almeida HA et al (2009) Biomanufacturing for tissue engineering: present and future trends. Virtual Phys Prototyp 4:203–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Leong K, Chua C, Sudarmadji N, Yeong W (2008) Engineering functionally graded tissue engineering scaffolds. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 1:140–152CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Mould RF (2018) A century of X-rays and radioactivity in medicine: with emphasis on photographic records of the early years. Routledge, PhiladelphiaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Suetens P (2017) Fundamentals of medical imaging. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bertoldi S, Farè S, Tanzi MC (2011) Assessment of scaffold porosity: the new route of micro-CT. J Appl Biomater Biomech 9:165–175PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Herman GT (2009) Fundamentals of computerized tomography: image reconstruction from projections. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Mankovich NJ, Samson D, Pratt W et al (1994) Surgical planning using three-dimensional imaging and computer modeling. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 27:875–889Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hall EJ, Brenner DJ (2008) Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. Br J Radiol 81:362–378CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Vlaardingerbroek MT, Boer JA (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging: theory and practice. Springer Science & Business Media, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kim S-G, Bandettini PA (2006) Principles of functional MRI. In: Functional MRI. pp 3–23Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Thurston RN, Papadakis EP, Pierce AD (1998) Ultrasonic instruments and devices II: reference for modern instrumentation, techniques, and technology. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Bierig SM, Michelle Bierig S, Jones A (2009) Accuracy and cost comparison of ultrasound versus alternative imaging modalities, including CT, MR, PET, and angiography. J Diagn Med Sonogr 25:138–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Thomenius KE (2009) Miniaturization of ultrasound scanners. Ultrasound Clin 4:385–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Hangiandreou NJ (2003) AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: topics in US. Radiographics 23:1019–1033CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Zhou Y (2016) The application of ultrasound in 3D bio-printing. Molecules 21:pii: E590.  https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21050590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Eklund A, Dufort P, Forsberg D, LaConte SM (2013) Medical image processing on the GPU–past, present and future. Med Image Anal 17:1073–1094CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Hunt BR (1973) The application of constrained least squares estimation to image restoration by digital computer. IEEE Trans Comput C-22:805–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Perona P, Malik J (1990) Scale-space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 12:629–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Granlund GH, Knutsson H (1995) Signal processing for computer visionGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Elad M (2002) On the origin of the bilateral filter and ways to improve it. IEEE Trans Image Process 11:1141–1151CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Coupe P, Yger P, Prima S et al (2008) An optimized blockwise nonlocal means denoising filter for 3-D magnetic resonance images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 27:425–441CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    IEEE (2013) PET/CT image denoising and segmentation based on a multi observation and a multi scale Markov tree model. In: 2013 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (2013 NSS/MIC)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Xu Z, Bagci U, Seidel J et al (2014) Segmentation based denoising of PET images: an iterative approach via regional means and affinity propagation. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 17:698–705PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Liu RW, Shi L, Huang W et al (2014) Generalized total variation-based MRI Rician denoising model with spatially adaptive regularization parameters. Magn Reson Imaging 32:702–720CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Yang J, Fan J, Ai D et al (2016) Local statistics and non-local mean filter for speckle noise reduction in medical ultrasound image. Neurocomputing 195:88–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Shapiro LG, Stockman GC (2001) Computer visionGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Zhang Y-J Image Segmentation in the Last 40 Years. In: Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Second Edition. pp 1818–1823Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Roberts LG (1963) Machine perception of three-dimensional solidsGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Brice CR, Fennema CL (1970) Scene analysis using regions. Artif Intell 1:205–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Zaitoun NM, Aqel MJ (2015) Survey on image segmentation techniques. Procedia Comput Sci 65:797–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Barbieri AL, de Arruda GF, Rodrigues FA et al (2011) An entropy-based approach to automatic image segmentation of satellite images. Phys A: Statis Mechan Appl 390:512–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Mejia-Inigo R, Barilla-Perez ME, Montes-Venegas HA (2009) Color-based texture image segmentation for vehicle detection. In: 2009 6th International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computing Science and Automatic Control (CCE)Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Bosch M, Zhu F, Delp EJ (2011) Segmentation-based video compression using texture and motion models. IEEE J Sel Top Signal Process 5:1366–1377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Smith SM (2002) Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum Brain Mapp 17:143–155CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Yazdani S, Yusof R, Karimian A et al (2015) Image segmentation methods and applications in MRI brain images. IETE Tech Rev 32:413–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Petitjean C, Dacher J-N (2011) A review of segmentation methods in short axis cardiac MR images. Med Image Anal 15:169–184CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Slomka PJ, Dey D, Sitek A et al (2017) Cardiac imaging: working towards fully-automated machine analysis & interpretation. Expert Rev Med Devices 14:197–212CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Xie J, Jiang Y, Tsui H-T (2005) Segmentation of kidney from ultrasound images based on texture and shape priors. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 24:45–57CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Mharib AM, Ramli AR, Mashohor S, Mahmood RB (2011) Survey on liver CT image segmentation methods. Artif Intell Rev 37:83–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Moccia S, De Momi E, El Hadji S, Mattos LS (2018) Blood vessel segmentation algorithms - review of methods, datasets and evaluation metrics. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 158:71–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Dogdas B, Stout D, Chatziioannou AF, Leahy RM (2007) Digimouse: a 3D whole body mouse atlas from CT and cryosection data. Phys Med Biol 52:577–587CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Lavdas I, Glocker B, Kamnitsas K et al (2017) Fully automatic, multiorgan segmentation in normal whole body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), using classification forests (CFs), convolutional neural networks (CNNs), and a multi-atlas (MA) approach. Med Phys 44:5210–5220CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Ackerman MJ (2016) The visible human project®: From body to bits. In: 2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC)Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Danchin A, Médigue C, Gascuel O et al (1991) From data banks to data bases. Res Microbiol 142:913–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Petrila T, Trif D (2006) Basics of fluid mechanics and introduction to computational fluid dynamics. Springer Science & Business Media, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Sun W, Starly B, Nam J, Darling A (2005) Bio-CAD modeling and its applications in computer-aided tissue engineering. Comput Aided Des Appl 37:1097–1114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Lacroix D, Chateau A, Ginebra M-P, Planell JA (2006) Micro-finite element models of bone tissue-engineering scaffolds. Biomaterials 27:5326–5334CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Chai X, van Herk M, van de Kamer JB et al (2011) Finite element based bladder modeling for image-guided radiotherapy of bladder cancer. Med Phys 38:142–150CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Noritomi P, Xavier T, Silva J (2011) A comparison between BioCAD and some known methods for finite element model generation. In: Innovative developments in virtual and physical prototyping. pp 685–690Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Anagnostakis A, Pappas A, Sucaet Y, Waelput W (2014) Digital pathology data brokerage: a standard recommendation for complex digital pathology information web-services. Anal Cell Pathol 2014:1–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Sucaet Y, Waelput W (2014) Digital pathology. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Paganelli C, Summers P, Gianoli C et al (2017) A tool for validating MRI-guided strategies: a digital breathing CT/MRI phantom of the abdominal site. Med Biol Eng Comput 55:2001–2014CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Wang C, Yin F-F, Segars WP et al (2017) Development of a computerized 4-D MRI phantom for liver motion study. Technol Cancer Res Treat:1533034617723753Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Veress AI, Segars WP, Weiss JA et al (2006) Normal and pathological NCAT image and phantom data based on physiologically realistic left ventricle finite-element models. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 25:1604–1616CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Mukai N, Takahashi T, Chang Y (2016) Particle-based Simulation on Aortic Valve Behavior with CG Model Generated from CT. In: Proceedings of the 11th Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and ApplicationsGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Bolwin K, Czekalla B, Frohwein LJ et al (2018) Anthropomorphic thorax phantom for cardio-respiratory motion simulation in tomographic imaging. Phys Med Biol 63:035009CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Dao TT, Tho M-CHB (2014) Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system: modeling of data uncertainty and knowledge. Wiley, HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Kajiyama K (2016) Domestic market trend for medical imaging and radiological system. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi 72:717–719CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Scholl I, Aach T, Deserno TM, Kuhlen T (2010) Challenges of medical image processing. Comput Sci Res Dev 26:5–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Suganya R, Rajaram S, Sheik Abdullah A (2018) Big data in medical image processing. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Després P, Jia X (2017) A review of GPU-based medical image reconstruction. Phys Med 42:76–92CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Smistad E, Falch TL, Bozorgi M et al (2015) Medical image segmentation on GPUs—a comprehensive review. Med Image Anal 20:1–18CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Pianykh OS (2009) Digital imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM): a practical introduction and survival guide. Springer Science & Business Media, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Taubman D, Marcellin M (2012) JPEG2000 image compression fundamentals, standards and practice: image compression fundamentals, standards and practice. Springer Science & Business Media, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Fryza T (2006) Improving quality of video signals encoded by 3D DCT transform. In: Proceedings ELMAR 2006Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Systems Management Council Interchangeable Variable Block Data Format for Positioning, Contouring, and Contouring/Positioning Numerically Controlled MachinesGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Evans B (2012) Practical 3D printers: the science and art of 3D printing. Apress, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Munaz A, Vadivelu RK, St. John J et al (2016) Three-dimensional printing of biological matters. J Sci Adv Mat Dev 1:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Chang K-H (2013) Product manufacturing and cost estimating using CAD/CAE: the computer aided engineering design series. Academic Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Locascio A (2001) Manufacturing cost modeling for product design. In: Information-based manufacturing. pp 315–325Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Ulrich KT (2015) Does product design really determine 80% of manufacturing cost? (Classic Reprint)Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    CAD’15 (2015) Knowledge integration in CAD-CAM process chain. In: CAD’15Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.SMART Infrastructure Facility, Faculty of Engineering & Information SciencesUniversity of WollongongWollongongAustralia

Personalised recommendations