Advertisement

Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Conscious Unrestrained Mice

  • Aileen J. F. KingEmail author
  • Matilda R. Kennard
  • Manasi Nandi
Protocol
  • 58 Downloads
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 2128)

Abstract

Measurement of blood glucose concentration is a common end point in studies using animal models of diabetes. Usually a blood glucose meter is used to measure non-fasted blood glucose concentrations, typically at frequencies of between 1 and 7 times per week. This process involves pricking the tip of the tail to collect a small blood sample (0.5–5 μL), which could potentially cause a stress response and affect blood glucose concentrations. Moreover, with blood glucose concentrations constantly fluctuating in response to feeding and activity, a single-point measurement can easily misrepresent the actual glycemic control of the animal. In this chapter, we discuss the use of continuous glucose monitoring in mice by radio-telemetry which allows second-by-second changes in blood glucose to be captured without restraining the mouse. Glucose excursions rather than single-point measurements may prove more useful in detecting effects of treatments, and lack of handling may avoid stress responses causing artefacts. We outline what is involved in implanting such devices into mice including some practical tips to maximize success.

Key words

Continuous glucose monitoring Mice Glucose telemetry 

References

  1. 1.
    Balcombe JP, Barnard ND, Sandusky C (2004) Laboratory routines cause animal stress. Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci 43(6):42–51PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Diehl KH, Hull R, Morton D, Pfister R, Rabemampianina Y, Smith D, Vidal JM, van de Vorstenbosch C (2001) A good practice guide to the administration of substances and removal of blood, including routes and volumes. J Appl Toxicol 21(1):15–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lo Martire V, Valli A, Bingaman MJ, Zoccoli G, Silvani A, Swoap SJ (2018) Changes in blood glucose as a function of body temperature in laboratory mice: implications for daily torpor. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 315(4):E662–e670.  https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00201.2018CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    King AJ, Austin AL, Nandi M, Bowe JE (2017) Diabetes in rats is cured by islet transplantation...But only during daytime. Cell Transplant 26(1):171–172.  https://doi.org/10.3727/096368916X692258CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hirsch IB, Brownlee M (2005) Should minimal blood glucose variability become the gold standard of glycemic control? J Diabetes Complications 19(3):178–181.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2004.10.001CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kovatchev B (2019) Glycemic variability: risk factors, assessment, and control. J Diabetes Sci Technol 13(4):627–635.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296819826111CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wurbel H (2017) More than 3Rs: the importance of scientific validity for harm-benefit analysis of animal research. Lab Anim 46(4):164–166.  https://doi.org/10.1038/laban.1220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kappel S, Hawkins P, Mendl MT (2017) To group or not to group? Good practice for housing male laboratory mice. Animals 7(12).  https://doi.org/10.3390/ani7120088

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aileen J. F. King
    • 1
    Email author
  • Matilda R. Kennard
    • 1
  • Manasi Nandi
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Diabetes, School of Life Course SciencesKing’s College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical SciencesKing’s College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations