Advertisement

Surgical Protocols for Squamous Cell Cancer of the Esophagus

  • María Carmen Fernández Moreno
  • Simon LawEmail author
Protocol
  • 54 Downloads
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 2129)

Abstract

Surgery is the mainstay treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). A major development in surgical therapy for esophageal cancer in the past two or three decades has been the marked reduction in surgical mortality rates as a result of improvement in staging technologies, patient selection, perioperative support systems, and surgical experience. Minimally invasive techniques are also becoming widely adopted. Protocol for surgical management of squamous cell cancer of the esophagus is described herein.

Key words

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma Surgery Esophagectomy Lymphadenectomy Complications Morbidities Minimally invasive esophagectomy 

References

  1. 1.
    Kitagawa Y, Uno T, Oyama T, Kato K, Kato H, Kawakubo H, Kawamura O, Kusano M, Kuwano H, Takeuchi H, Toh Y, Doki Y, Naomoto Y, Nemoto K, Booka E, Matsubara H, Miyazaki T, Muto M, Yanagisawa A, Yoshida M (2019) Esophageal cancer practice guidelines 2017 edited by the Japan esophageal society: part 1. Esophagus 16(1):1–24.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-018-0641-9CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Peyre CG, Hagen JA, DeMeester SR, Altorki NK, Ancona E, Griffin SM, Holscher A, Lerut T, Law S, Rice TW, Ruol A, van Lanschot JJ, Wong J, DeMeester TR (2008) The number of lymph nodes removed predicts survival in esophageal cancer: an international study on the impact of extent of surgical resection. Ann Surg 248(4):549–556Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tong D, Law S (2013) Extended lymphadenectomy in esophageal cancer is crucial. World J Surg 37(8):1751–1756.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2068-8CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rizk NP, Ishwaran H, Rice TW, Chen LQ, Schipper PH, Kesler KA, Law S, Lerut TE, Reed CE, Salo JA, Scott WJ, Hofstetter WL, Watson TJ, Allen MS, Rusch VW, Blackstone EH (2010) Optimum lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg 251(1):46–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Low DE, Kuppusamy MK, Alderson D, Cecconello I, Chang AC, Darling D, Davies A, D'Journo XB, Gisbertz SS, Griffin M, Harwick R, Hoelscher A, Hofstetter W, Jobe B, Kitagawa Y, Law S, Mariette C, Maynard N, Morse CR, Nafteux P, Pera M, Pramesh CS, Puig S, Reynolds JV, Schroeder W, Smithers M, Wijnhoven PL (2019) Benchmarking complications associated with esophagectomy. Ann Surg 269(2):291–298Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Audisio RA, Ramesh H, Longo WE, Zbar AP, Pope D (2005) Preoperative assessment of surgical risk in Oncogeriatric patients. Oncologist 10(4):262–268.  https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.10-4-262CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ferguson MK, Celauro AD, Prachand V (2011) Prediction of major pulmonary complications after esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 91(5):1494–1501.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.12.036CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Low DE, Allum W, De Manzoni G, Ferri L, Immanuel A, Kuppusamy M, Law S, Lindblad M, Maynard N, Neal J, Pramesh CS, Scott M, Mark Smithers B, Addor V, Ljungqvist O (2019) Guidelines for perioperative care in esophagectomy: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS((R))) society recommendations. World J Surg 43(2):299–330.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4786-4CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Low DE (2015) Enhanced recovery pathways lead to an improvement in postoperative outcomes following esophagectomy: systematic review and pooled analysis. Dis Esophagus 28(5):468–475.  https://doi.org/10.1111/dote.12214CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Findlay MJ, Gillies SR, Millo KJ, Sgromo DB, Marshall DRE, Maynard DN (2014) Enhanced recovery for esophagectomy: a systematic review and evidence-based guidelines. Ann Surg 259(3):413–431.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000349CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Weimann A, Braga M, Carli F, Higashiguchi T, Hübner M, Klek S, Laviano A, Ljungqvist O, Lobo DN, Martindale R, Waitzberg DL, Bischoff SC, Singer P (2017) ESPEN guideline: clinical nutrition in surgery. Clin Nutr 36(3):623–650.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2017.02.013CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Akiyama H, Tsurumaru M, Udagawa H, Kajiyama Y (1994) Radical lymph node dissection for cancer of the thoracic esophagus. Ann Surg 220(3):364–372; discussion 372–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Biere S, van Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, Bonavina L, Rosman C, Garcia J, Gisbertz SS, Klinkenbijl JHG, Hollmann MW, de Lange E, Bonjer JH, van der Peet DL, Cuesta MA (2012) Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 379(9829):1887–1892.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60516-9CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mariette MMB, Pezet D, Dalban C, Collet D, Thomas PA, Brigand C, Perniceni T, Carrere N, Bonnetain F, Piessen G (2019) Hybrid minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicenter, open- label randomized phase III controlled trial, the MIRO trial. N Engl J Med 380:2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Law S, Boey JP, Kwok KF, Wong KH, Chu KM, Wong J (2004) Pleural drainage after transthoracic esophagectomy: experience with a vacuum system. Dis Esophagus 17(1):81–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ohkura Y, Shindoh J, Ueno M, Iizuka T, Haruta S, Udagawa H (2018) A new postoperative pain management (intravenous acetaminophen: Acelio®) leads to enhanced recovery after esophagectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis. Surg Today 48(5):502–509.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-017-1616-5CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wong I, Law S (2018) Early oral intake through meticulous chewing after esophagectomy. J Thorac Dis 10(Suppl 17):S2070–S2073.  https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2018.05.186CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zehetner J, DeMeester SR, Alicuben ET, Oh DS, Lipham JC, Hagen JA, DeMeester TR (2015) Intraoperative assessment of perfusion of the gastric graft and correlation with anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy. Ann Surg 262(1):74–78.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000811CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kechagias A, van Rossum PSN, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R (2016) Ischemic conditioning of the stomach in the prevention of esophagogastric anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 101(4):1614–1623.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.10.034CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Murthy SC, Law S, Whooley BP, Alexandrou A, Chu KM, Wong J (2003) Atrial fibrillation after esophagectomy is a marker for postoperative morbidity and mortality. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 126(4):1162–1167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lo OS, Law S, Chu KM, Wong J (2003) Chylothorax after esophagectomy. Surgery 133(3):340–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Law S, Fok M, Chu KM, Wong J (1997) Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 226(2):169–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Law S, Suen DT, Wong KH, Kwok KF, Wong J (2005) A single-layer, continuous, hand-sewn method for esophageal anastomosis: prospective evaluation in 218 patients. Arch Surg 140(1):33–39Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Esophageal and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of SurgeryThe University of Hong KongHong KongChina

Personalised recommendations