Advertisement

Cell Tracking pp 117-126 | Cite as

Protease-Activated Sensors for In Vivo Imaging of Cell Populations

  • Kayla Eschliman
  • Stefan H. BossmannEmail author
Protocol
  • 100 Downloads
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 2126)

Abstract

Biosensors are important devices that can be used to obtain information from within a living organism. They can be implanted within living tissues in order to continuously monitor for changes. This allows for personalized, noninvasive medicine, since a baseline can be more accurately established and any deviations, even slight, can be detected. These devices have applications in the treatment of diseases such as diabetes and cancer, as well as the study of pathways of interest and tailored drug dosing. Proteases within the tumor microenvironment can be studied in vivo in order to indicate the effectiveness of treatments received. This unprecedented real-time information is extremely valuable as it can be used to alter the course of treatment accordingly.

Key words

Proteases Tumor Profiling Nanosensors Activity-based biomarkers In vivo sensing Diagnostics 

References

  1. 1.
    Eckert M, Vu P, Zhang K, Kang D, Ali M, Xu C, Zhao W et al (2013) Novel molecular and nanosensors for in vivo sensing. Theranostics 3(8):583–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rong G, Corrie S, Clark H et al (2017) In vivo biosensing: progress and perspectives. ACS Sens 2(3):337–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Abd-Elgaliel W, Crus-Monserrate Z, Logsdon C, Tung C et al (2011) Molecular imaging of Cathepsin E-positive tumors in mice using a novel protease-activatable fluorescent probe. Mol BioSyst 7(12):3207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Craven T, Avlonitis N, Mcdonald N, Walton T, Scholefield E, Akram A, Walsh T, Haslett C, Bradley M, Dhaliwal K et al (2018) Super-silent FRET sensor enables live cell imaging and flow cytometric stratification of intracellular serine protease activity in neutrophils. Sci Rep 8(1):1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    To TL, Piggott BJ, Makhijani K, Ru D, Jan YN, Shu X et al (2015) Rationally designed Fluorogenic protease reporter visualizes spatiotemporal dynamics of apoptosis in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112(11):3338–3343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen N, Zou J, Wang S, Ye Y, Huang Y, Gadda G, Yang J et al (2009) Designing protease sensors for real-time imaging of trypsin activation in pancreatic cancer cells. Biochemistry 48(15):3519–3526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yang K, Zhu L, Nie L, Sun X, Cheng L, Qu C, Niu G, Chen X, Lui Z et al (2014) Visualization of protease activity in vitro using an Activatable photo-acoustic imaging probe based on CuS nanoparticles. Theranostics 4(2):134–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dudani J, Jain P, Kwong G, Stevens K, Bhatia S et al (2015) Photoactivated spatiotemporally-responsive nanosensors of in vivo protease activity. ACS Nano 9(12):11708–11717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schuerle S, Dudani J, Christiansen M, Anikeeva P, Bhatia S et al (2016) Magnetically actuated protease sensors for in vivo tumor profiling. Nano Lett 16:6303–6310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vince J, Silke J et al (2016) The intersection of cell death and Inflammasome activation. Cell Mol Life Sci 73(11-12):2349–2367CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ChemistryKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA
  2. 2.Department of Chemistry and Johnson Cancer CenterKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA

Personalised recommendations