Advertisement

Serological Tests

  • Alangar Ishwara Bhat
  • Govind Pratap Rao
Protocol
  • 46 Downloads
Part of the Springer Protocols Handbooks book series (SPH)

Abstract

Serological tests are based on the reaction of antibody with antigen. Antibody specifically reacts with the antigen against which it is produced. A large number of serological tests are available for the detection and diagnosis of plant viruses. Traditional methods such as tube precipitin, microprecipitin, chloroplast agglutination and gel diffusion involved direct observation of specific precipitates of virus and antibody, either in liquid media or agar gels. These methods require large quantities of reactants—antiserum and antigens for successful detection. With the advent of enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) during 1980s, traditional methods are replaced by this method. Various formats of ELSA such as double-antibody sandwich (DAS)-ELISA, F(ab)2-ELISA, plate-trapped ELISA, and direct antigen-coated (DAC)-ELISA are used widely for the detection and assay of plant viruses. It is very economical in the use of antiserum, adaptable for large-scale testing and quantitative measurement. ELISA performed on a nitrocellulose or nylon membrane is referred to as dot immunobinding assay (DIBA). Tissue blotting immunoassay (TBIA) is another simple method where crude sap from plants are directly blotted and used for detection through immunology. Immunosorbent electron microscopy (ISEM) combines electron microscopy and serology for the detection and diagnosis of viruses. Electro-blot immunoassay (EBIA) though cumbersome is a confirmatory assay that involves separation of viral antigens on a gel followed by its detection through serology. Lateral flow assay (LFA) or dip stick assay is the latest and the only serological method used for the detection of viruses without the aid of a laboratory and skilled technical personnel. It is an onsite and quick assay that can be performed by anyone and suitable for the detection of viruses that occur in high concentration in plants.

Key words

Tube precipitin Chloroplast agglutination Micro precipitin Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay Dot immunobinding assay Tissue blot immunoassay Electro-blot immunoassay Immunosorbent electron microscopy Immunofluorescence Lateral flow immune assay Antisera Antigen 

References

  1. Avrameas S (1969) Coupling of enzymes to proteins with glutaraldehyde and use of conjugates for the detection of antigens and antibodies. Immunochemistry 5:43–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Banttari EE, Goodwin PH (1985) Detection of potato viruses S, X and Y by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay on nitrocellulose membrane (Dot-ELISA). Plant Dis 69:202–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barbara DJ, Clark MF (1982) A simple indirect ELISA using F(ab’)2 fragments of immunoglobulin. J Gen Virol 58:315–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clark MF, Adams AN (1977) Characteristics of the microtitre plate method of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of plant viruses. J Gen Virol 34:475–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clark MF, Lister RM, Bar-Joseph M (1986) ELISA techniques. Methods Enzymol 118:742–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Derrick KS (1973) Quantitative assay for plant viruses using serologically specific electron microscopy. Virology 56:652–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Draz MS, Shafiee H (2018) Applications of gold nanoparticles in virus detection. Theranostics 8(7):1985–2017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gella FJ, Serra J, Gener J (1991) Latex agglutination procedures in immunodiagnosis. Pure Appl Chem 63:1131–1134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hampton R, Ball E, De Boer S (1990) Serological methods for detection and identification of viral and bacterial plant pathogens. APS Press, St. Paul, MNGoogle Scholar
  10. Hill SA (1984) Methods in plant virology. Blackwell Scientific, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Hsu HT (1991) Direct tissue blotting for detection of tomato spotted wilt virus in Impatiens. Plant Dis 75:292–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Koenig R (1981) Indirect ELISA methods for the broad specific detection of plant viruses. J Gen Virol 55:53–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Koenig R, Paul HL (1982) Variants of ELISA in plant virus diagnosis. J Virol Methods 5:113–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Koets M, Sander I, Bogdanovic J, Doekes G, van Amerongen A (2006) A rapid lateral flow immunoassay for the detection of fungal alpha-amylase at the workplace. J Environ Monit 8:942–946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kulabhusan PK, Rajwade JM, SugumarV TG, Hameed AS, Paknikar KM (2017) Field-usable lateral flow immunoassay for the rapid detection of white spot syndrome virus (WSSV). PLoS One 3:2017.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lin NS, Hsu YH, Hsu HT (1990) Immunological detection of plant viruses and a mycoplasma-like organism by direct tissue blotting on nitrocellulose membranes. Phytopathology 80:824–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Louro D, Lesemann D-E (1984) Use of protein A-gold complex for specific labeling of antibodies bound to plant viruses. I. Viral antigens in suspensions. J Virol Methods 9:107–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Milne RG, Luisoni E (1975) Rapid, high-resolution immune electron microscopy of virus preparations. Virology 68:270–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nielsen K, Yu WL, Kelly L, Bermudez R, Renteria T, Dajer A et al (2008) Development of a lateral flow assay for rapid detection of bovine antibody to Anaplasma marginale. J Immunoassay Immunochem 29:10–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Noordam D (1975) Identification of plant viruses: methods and experiments. Cen Agric Pub Doc, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  21. O’Donell IJ, Shukla DD, Gough KH (1982) Electroblot immunoassay of virus infected plant sap—a powerful technique for detecting plant viruses. J Virol Methods 4:19–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ouchterlony O (1968) Handbook of immunodiffusion and immunoelectrophoresis. Ann Arbor Scientific Publications, MichiganGoogle Scholar
  23. Pares RD, Whitecross WI (1982) Gold-labeled antibody decoration (GLAD) in the diagnosis of plant viruses by immuno-electron microscopy. J Immunol Methods 51:23–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Posthuma-Trumpie GA, van Amerongen A (2013) Lateral flow assays. In: Eline P (ed) Antibodies applications and new developments. Bentham Science, MeulenbergGoogle Scholar
  25. Rybicki EP, Von Wechmar MB (1982) Enzyme-assisted immune detection of plant virus proteins electroblotted onto nitrocellulose paper. J Virol Methods 5:267–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Samson RG, Allen TC, Whitworth JL (1993) Evaluation of direct tissue blotting to detect potato viruses. Am Potato J 70:257–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Talley J, Warren FHJB, Torrance L, Jones RAC (1980) A simple kit for detection of plant viruses by the latex serological test. Plant Pathol 29:77–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Van Slogteren DHM (1955) Serological micro-reactions with plant viruses under paraffin oil. Proceedings of the Conference on Potato virus diseasesGoogle Scholar
  29. Walkey DGA (1985) Applied plant virology. Heinemann, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alangar Ishwara Bhat
    • 1
  • Govind Pratap Rao
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Crop ProtectionICAR-Indian Institute of Spices ResearchKozhikodeIndia
  2. 2.Division of Plant PathologyICAR-Indian Agricultural Research InstituteNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations