Advertisement

In Vitro Differentiation of CD4+ T Cell Effector and Regulatory Subsets

  • Jaclyn R. Espinosa
  • Joshua D. Wheaton
  • Maria CiofaniEmail author
Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 2111)

Abstract

In vitro differentiation of naïve CD4+ T cells into effector and regulatory subsets offers a means to acquire large numbers of relatively homogeneous cell populations for experimentation. However, culture systems for T cell differentiation described in the literature vary widely in efficiency and complexity, limiting their comparison across studies. Here, we present a standardized and robust method for the isolation and in vitro differentiation of six CD4+ T cell subsets from mouse naïve T cells.

Key words

CD4 T cells In vitro differentiation Polarization Helper T cells Cytokines Th1 Th2 Th17 iTreg 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by NIH grant R01 GM115474 to M.C.

References

  1. 1.
    Jelley-Gibbs DM et al (2000) Two distinct stages in the transition from naive CD4 T cells to effectors, early antigen-dependent and late cytokine-driven expansion and differentiation. J Immunol 165(9):5017–5026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Murphy KM, Reiner SL (2002) The lineage decisions of helper T cells. Nat Rev Immunol 2(12):933–944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wilson CB, Rowell E, Sekimata M (2009) Epigenetic control of T-helper-cell differentiation. Nat Rev Immunol 9(2):91–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hsieh CS et al (1993) Development of TH1 CD4+ T cells through IL-12 produced by listeria-induced macrophages. Science 260(5107):547–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lighvani AA et al (2001) T-bet is rapidly induced by interferon-gamma in lymphoid and myeloid cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98(26):15137–15142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mosmann TR et al (1986) Two types of murine helper T cell clone. I. Definition according to profiles of lymphokine activities and secreted proteins. J Immunol 136(7):2348–2357PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kanhere A et al (2012) T-bet and GATA3 orchestrate Th1 and Th2 differentiation through lineage-specific targeting of distal regulatory elements. Nat Commun 3:1268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bettelli E et al (2008) Induction and effector functions of T(H)17 cells. Nature 453(7198):1051–1057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee Y et al (2012) Induction and molecular signature of pathogenic TH17 cells. Nat Immunol 13(10):991–999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ghoreschi K et al (2010) Generation of pathogenic T(H)17 cells in the absence of TGF-beta signalling. Nature 467(7318):967–971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ohkura N, Kitagawa Y, Sakaguchi S (2013) Development and maintenance of regulatory T cells. Immunity 38(3):414–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schmitt EG, Williams CB (2013) Generation and function of induced regulatory T cells. Front Immunol 4:152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ciofani M et al (2012) A validated regulatory network for Th17 cell specification. Cell 151(2):289–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Carr TM et al (2017) JunB promotes Th17 cell identity and restrains alternative CD4+ T-cell programs during inflammation. Nat Commun 8(1):301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Agarwal S, Rao A (1998) Modulation of chromatin structure regulates cytokine gene expression during T cell differentiation. Immunity 9(6):765–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bandukwala HS et al (2012) Selective inhibition of CD4+ T-cell cytokine production and autoimmunity by BET protein and c-Myc inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109(36):14532–14537CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jaclyn R. Espinosa
    • 1
  • Joshua D. Wheaton
    • 1
  • Maria Ciofani
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of ImmunologyDuke University Medical CenterDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations