Advertisement

Analysis of RNA Sequencing Data Using CLC Genomics Workbench

  • Chia-Hsin Liu
  • Y. Peter DiEmail author
Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 2102)

Abstract

RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) is a recently developed approach to perform transcriptome profiling using next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies. Studies have shown that RNA-seq provides accurate measurement of transcript levels as well as their isoforms, which is useful to address complex transcriptomes. In addition, the increasing publicly available sequencing datasets and decreasing sequencing cost promote the use of RNA-seq for hypothesis-generating studies. In this chapter, we demonstrate how to analyze RNA-seq data and generate interpretable results using CLC genomic workbench software and perform the downstream pathway analysis using ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA).

Key words

RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) CLC Genomic Workbench Ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA) 

Notes

Acknowledgments

CLC Genomics Workbench and IPA software licensed through the Molecular Biology Information Service of the Health Sciences Library System, University of Pittsburgh, were used for data analysis.

References

  1. 1.
    Wang Z, Gerstein M, Snyder M (2009) RNA-seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat Rev Genet 10(1):57–63.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2484CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    van Hal NL, Vorst O, van Houwelingen AM, Kok EJ, Peijnenburg A, Aharoni A, van Tunen AJ, Keijer J (2000) The application of DNA microarrays in gene expression analysis. J Biotechnol 78(3):271–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Okoniewski MJ, Miller CJ (2006) Hybridization interactions between probesets in short oligo microarrays lead to spurious correlations. BMC Bioinformatics 7:276.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-276CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Royce TE, Rozowsky JS, Gerstein MB (2007) Toward a universal microarray: prediction of gene expression through nearest-neighbor probe sequence identification. Nucleic Acids Res 35(15):e99.  https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm549CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ozsolak F, Milos PM (2011) RNA sequencing: advances, challenges and opportunities. Nat Rev Genet 12(2):87–98.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2934CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Byron SA, Van Keuren-Jensen KR, Engelthaler DM, Carpten JD, Craig DW (2016) Translating RNA sequencing into clinical diagnostics: opportunities and challenges. Nat Rev Genet 17(5):257–271.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg.2016.10CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mortazavi A, Williams BA, McCue K, Schaeffer L, Wold B (2008) Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-seq. Nat Methods 5(7):621–628.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1226CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Koch CM, Chiu SF, Akbarpour M, Bharat A, Ridge KM, Bartom ET, Winter DR (2018) A Beginner’s guide to analysis of RNA sequencing data. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 59(2):145–157.  https://doi.org/10.1165/rcmb.2017-0430TRCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
    Ewing B, Green P (1998) Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities. Genome Res 8(3):186–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental and Occupational HealthUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations