Cultivation of Productive Biofilms in Flow Reactors and Their Characterization by CLSM

  • Christian David
  • Ingeborg Heuschkel
  • Katja Bühler
  • Rohan KarandeEmail author
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 2100)


Biofilms, a natural form of immobilized whole cells, are currently being investigated as a robust biocatalyst for the production of chemicals. Fluidic conditions and reactor geometry severely influence biofilm growth, development, and reaction performance. However, there is a missing link between the in situ characterization of biofilms on microscale setups and macroscale reactors because of the difference in reactor geometry and fluidic conditions. In this protocol, we describe the assembly and operation of flow cell and flow reactor setups with identical system geometry and segmented flow conditions to link biofilm characterization to reactor performance. The flow cell setup enables the in situ characterization of biofilm growth, structural development, and cell viability by utilizing confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Whereas, the laboratory scale flow reactor allows the determination of overall biofilm dry mass, catalytic activity, and final product titer during biocatalysis. Finally, CLSM image acquisition and the following data analysis are briefly described.

Key words

Biofilm CLSM Biocatalysis Segmented flow Pseudomonas 


  1. 1.
    Flemming H-C, Wingender J, Szewzyk U, Steinberg P, Rice SA, Kjelleberg S (2016) Biofilms: an emergent form of bacterial life. Nat Rev Microbiol 14:563–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Halan B, Schmid A, Buehler K (2011) Real-time solvent tolerance analysis of Pseudomonas sp. Strain VLB120ΔC catalytic biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:1563–1571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Halan B, Buehler K, Schmid A (2012) Biofilms as living catalysts in continuous chemical syntheses. Trends Biotechnol 30:453–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tsoligkas AN, Winn M, Bowen J, Overton TW, Simmons MJH, Goss RJM (2011) Engineering Biofilms for Biocatalysis. Chembiochem 12:1391–1395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Todhanakasem T (2017) Developing microbial biofilm as a robust biocatalyst and its challenges. Biocatal Biotransformation 35:86–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Drescher K, Shen Y, Bassler BL, Stone HA (2013) Biofilm streamers cause catastrophic disruption of flow with consequences for environmental and medical systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:4345–4350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Karande R, Halan B, Schmid A, Buehler K (2014) Segmented flow is controlling growth of catalytic biofilms in continuous multiphase microreactors. Biotechnol Bioeng 111:1831–1840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tolker-Nielsen T, Sternberg C, Tolker-Nielsen T, Sternberg C (2011) Growing and analyzing biofilms in flow chambers. In: Current protocols in microbiology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Hoboken, NJ, pp 1B.2.1–1B.2.17Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pawley JB (2006) Handbook of biological confocal microscopy. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9:671–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian David
    • 1
  • Ingeborg Heuschkel
    • 1
  • Katja Bühler
    • 1
  • Rohan Karande
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department Solar MaterialsHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZLeipzigGermany

Personalised recommendations