Advertisement

Intraparticle pH Sensing Within Immobilized Enzymes: Immobilized Yellow Fluorescent Protein as Optical Sensor for Spatiotemporal Mapping of pH Inside Porous Particles

  • Tanja Consolati
  • Juan M. Bolivar
  • Zdenek Petrasek
  • Jose Berenguer
  • Aurelio Hidalgo
  • Jose M. Guisan
  • Bernd NidetzkyEmail author
Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 2100)

Abstract

pH is a fundamental variable in enzyme catalysis and its measurement therefore is crucial for understanding and optimizing enzyme-catalyzed reactions. Whereas measurements within homogeneous bulk liquid solution are prominently used, enzymes immobilized inside porous particles often suffer from pH gradients due to partition effects and heterogeneously catalyzed biochemical reactions. Unfortunately, the measurements of intraparticle pH are not available due to the lack of useful suitable methodologies; as a consequence the biocatalyst characterization is hampered. Here, a fully biocompatible methodology for real-time optical sensing of pH within porous materials is described. A genetically encoded ratiometric pH indicator, the superfolder yellow fluorescent protein (sYFP), is used to functionalize the internal surface of enzyme carrier supports. By using controlled, tailor-made immobilization, sYFP is homogeneously distributed within these materials, and so enables, via self-referenced imaging analysis, pH measurements in high accuracy and with useful spatiotemporal resolution. The hydrolysis of penicillin by a penicillin acylase, taking place in solution or confined to the solid surface of the porous matrix is used to show the monitoring of evolution of internal pH. Thus, pH sensing based on immobilized sYFP represents a broadly applicable technique to the study of the internally heterogeneous environment of immobilized enzymes into solid particles.

Key words

Porous materials Internal pH sensing Yellow fluorescent protein Immobilization Spatiotemporal pH mapping 

References

  1. 1.
    Bolivar JM, Consolati T, Mayr T, Nidetzky B (2013) Shine a light on immobilized enzymes: real-time sensing in solid supported biocatalysts. Trends Biotechnol 31:194–203.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.01.004CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Benítez-Mateos AI, Nidetzky B, Bolivar JM, López-Gallego F (2018) Single-particle studies to advance the characterization of heterogeneous biocatalysts. ChemCatChem 10:654–665.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201701590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bolivar JM, Eisl I, Nidetzky B (2016) Advanced characterization of immobilized enzymes as heterogeneous biocatalysts. Catal Today 259:66–80.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2015.05.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Casey JR, Grinstein S, Orlowski J (2010) Sensors and regulators of intracellular pH. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11:50–61.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2820CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yang Z, Cao J, He Y et al (2014) Macro−/micro-environment-sensitive chemosensing and biological imaging. Chem Soc Rev 43:4563–4601.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c4cs00051jCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yamaguchi A, Namekawa M, Kamijo T et al (2011) Acid−base equilibria inside amine-functionalized mesoporous silica. Anal Chem 83:2939–2946.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ac102935qCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sun X, Xie J, Xu J et al (2015) Single-molecule studies of acidity distributions in mesoporous aluminosilicate thin films. Langmuir 31:5667–5675.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b01628CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Begemann J, Spiess AC (2015) Dual lifetime referencing enables pH-control for oxidoreductions in hydrogel-stabilized biphasic reaction systems. Biotechnol J 10:1822–1829.  https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201500198CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Huang HY, Shaw J, Yip C, Wu XY (2008) Microdomain pH gradient and kinetics inside composite polymeric membranes of pH and glucose sensitivity. Pharm Res 25:1150–1157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Boniello C, Mayr T, Klimant I et al (2010) Intraparticle concentration gradients for substrate and acidic product in immobilized cephalosporin C amidase and their dependencies on carrier characteristics and reaction parameters. Biotechnol Bioeng 106:528–540.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.22694CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zahel T, Boniello C, Nidetzky B (2013) Real-time measurement and modeling of intraparticle pH gradient formation in immobilized cephalosporin C amidase. Process Biochem 48:593–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Spiess A, Schlothauer R, Hinrichs J et al (1999) pH gradients in immobilized amidases and their influence on rates and yields of beta-lactam hydrolysis. Biotechnol Bioeng 62:267–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Spiess AC, Kasche V (2001) Direct measurement of pH profiles in immobilized enzyme carriers during kinetically controlled synthesis using CLSM. Biotechnol Prog 17:294–303.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bp000149eCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wencel D, Abel T, McDonagh C (2014) Optical chemical pH sensors. Anal Chem 86:15–29.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ac4035168CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Barczak M, McDonagh C, Wencel D (2016) Micro- and nanostructured sol-gel-based materials for optical chemical sensing (2005–2015). Microchim Acta 183:2085–2109.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-016-1863-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Luo H, Zhu L, Chang Y et al (2017) Microenvironmental pH changes in immobilized cephalosporin C acylase during a proton-producing reaction and regulation by a two-stage catalytic process. Bioresour Technol 223:157–165.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.10.038CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Boniello C, Mayr T, Bolivar JM, Nidetzky B (2012) Dual-lifetime referencing (DLR): a powerful method for on-line measurement of internal pH in carrier-bound immobilized biocatalysts. BMC Biotechnol 12:11.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-12-11CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kuwana E, Liang F, Sevick-Muraca EM (2004) Fluorescence lifetime spectroscopy of a pH-sensitive dye encapsulated in hydrogel beads. Biotechnol Prog 20:1561–1566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schwendt T, Michalik C, Zavrel M et al (2010) Determination of temporal and spatial concentration gradients in hydrogel beads using multiphoton microscopy techniques. Appl Spectrosc 64:720–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zavrel M, Michalik C, Schwendt T et al (2010) Systematic determination of intrinsic reaction parameters in enzyme immobilizates. Chem Eng Sci 65:2491–2499.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2009.12.026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Consolati T, Bolivar JM, Petrasek Z et al (2018) Biobased, internally pH-sensitive materials: immobilized yellow fluorescent protein as an optical sensor for spatiotemporal mapping of pH inside porous matrices. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10:6858–6868.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b16639CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pédelacq J-D, Cabantous S, Tran T et al (2006) Engineering and characterization of a superfolder green fluorescent protein. Nat Biotechnol 24:79–88.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1172CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Aliye N, Fabbretti A, Lupidi G et al (2015) Engineering color variants of green fluorescent protein (GFP) for thermostability, pH-sensitivity, and improved folding kinetics. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99:1205–1216.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-014-5975-1CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mateo C, Grazu V, Guisan JM (2013) Immobilization of enzymes on monofunctional and heterofunctional epoxy-activated supports. In: Guisan JM (ed) Immobilization of enzymes and cells. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, pp 43–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    López-Gallego F, Fernandez-Lorente G, Rocha-Martin J et al (2013) Stabilization of enzymes by multipoint covalent immobilization on supports activated with glyoxyl groups. In: Guisan JM (ed) Immobilization of enzymes and cells. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, pp 59–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Valencia P, Wilson L, Aguirre C, Illanes A (2010) Evaluation of the incidence of diffusional restrictions on the enzymatic reactions of hydrolysis of penicillin G and synthesis of cephalexin. Enzym Microb Technol 47:268–276.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2010.07.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Alvaro G, Fernandez-Lafuente R, Blanco RM, Guisán JM (1990) Immobilization-stabilization of penicillin G acylase from Escherichia coli. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 26:181–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tanja Consolati
    • 1
  • Juan M. Bolivar
    • 1
  • Zdenek Petrasek
    • 1
  • Jose Berenguer
    • 2
  • Aurelio Hidalgo
    • 2
  • Jose M. Guisan
    • 3
  • Bernd Nidetzky
    • 1
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Institute of Biotechnology and Biochemical Engineering, Graz University of Technology, NAWI GrazGrazAustria
  2. 2.Department of Molecular BiologyUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid, Center for Molecular Biology ‘Severo-Ochoa’ (UAM-CSIC)MadridSpain
  3. 3.Institute of Catalysis and Petroleum Chemistry (ICP-CSIC)MadridSpain
  4. 4.Austrian Centre of Industrial BiotechnologyGrazAustria

Personalised recommendations