Advertisement

pp 1-8 | Cite as

In Vitro Wound Healing Assays to Investigate Epidermal Migration

  • Kegan A. Main
  • Constantinos M. Mikelis
  • Colleen L. DoçiEmail author
Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series

Abstract

Re-epithelialization after cutaneous injury is a complex and multifaceted process that incorporates numerous cellular components interacting in a myriad of pathways. One of the most crucial aspects of this process is the initiation of keratinocyte migration to fill the wound bed. Re-epithelialization involves both the individual and collective movement of epidermal cells under the control of integrated signaling paradigms. It is therefore essential to develop a simple methodology to dissect the basic movement of epidermal cells in vitro. Scratch assays are relatively simple experiments in which a single layer of cells are plated onto a prepared dish with multiple furrows created in the cell bed. The resulting cellular migration to fill the wound bed can then be imaged and processed quantitatively to investigate migration rates and other factors of interest. Here, we provide important adaptations to the classic scratch assay to make it a robust, reproducible, and quantitative tool for the evaluation of epidermal cell migration.

Keywords

Migration Wound healing Re-epithelialization Scratch Keratinocyte Epidermal 

References

  1. 1.
    Doci CL, Mikelis CM, Callejas-Valera JL, Hansen KK, Molinolo AA, Inoue A, Offermanns S, Gutkind JS (2017) Epidermal loss of Galphaq confers a migratory and differentiation defect in keratinocytes. PLoS One 12(3):e0173692.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Friedl P, Wolf K (2010) Plasticity of cell migration: a multiscale tuning model. J Cell Biol 188(1):11–19.  https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200909003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Raja SK, Garcia MS, Isseroff RR (2007) Wound re-epithelialization: modulating keratinocyte migration in wound healing. Front Biosci 12:2849–2868Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hameedaldeen A, Liu J, Batres A, Graves GS, Graves DT (2014) FOXO1, TGF-beta regulation and wound healing. Int J Mol Sci 15(9):16257–16269.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms150916257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sauer B, Vogler R, Zimmermann K, Fujii M, Anzano MB, Schafer-Korting M, Roberts AB, Kleuser B (2004) Lysophosphatidic acid interacts with transforming growth factor-beta signaling to mediate keratinocyte growth arrest and chemotaxis. J Invest Dermatol 123(5):840–849.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-202X.2004.23458.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Seeger MA, Paller AS (2015) The roles of growth factors in keratinocyte migration. Adv Wound Care 4(4):213–224.  https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2014.0540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nardini JT, Chapnick DA, Liu X, Bortz DM (2016) Modeling keratinocyte wound healing dynamics: cell-cell adhesion promotes sustained collective migration. J Theor Biol 400:103–117.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2016.04.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vaughan RB, Trinkaus JP (1966) Movements of epithelial cell sheets in vitro. J Cell Sci 1(4):407–413Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Usui ML, Mansbridge JN, Carter WG, Fujita M, Olerud JE (2008) Keratinocyte migration, proliferation, and differentiation in chronic ulcers from patients with diabetes and normal wounds. J Histochem Cytochem 56(7):687–696.  https://doi.org/10.1369/jhc.2008.951194CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kegan A. Main
    • 1
  • Constantinos M. Mikelis
    • 2
  • Colleen L. Doçi
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Biology, College of Arts and SciencesMarian University IndianapolisIndianapolisUSA
  2. 2.Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of PharmacyTexas Tech University Health Sciences CenterAmarilloUSA

Personalised recommendations