Advertisement

Biomimetic Strategies Incorporating Enzymes into CaP Coatings Mimicking the In Vivo Environment

  • Ana M. Martins
  • Rui L. Reis
Protocol
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 1202)

Abstract

Biomimetic calcium phosphate coating (CaP) methodology mimics the natural biomineralization process of bone, which involves two phases: nucleation and growth. In this chapter we present a successful method to coating biodegradable natural-origin materials with biomimetic CaP layer as a strategy to incorporate enzymes with the main aim of controlling and tailoring their degradation over time. This strategy seems to enhance the bone-bonding, osteoconductive, and osteoinductive properties of natural-origin biomaterials that per se do not present these characteristics.

Keywords

Natural-origin biomaterials Biomimetics CaP coatings Enzymes 

Notes

Acknowledgements

A.M.M. acknowledges “Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia” (FCT) for the Postdoctoral grant (SFRH/BPD/66897/2009) financed by POPH-QREN-Advanced Formation, and co-financed by Social European Fund and National Fund from MCTES.

References

  1. 1.
    Abe Y, Kokubo T, Yamamuro T (1990) Apatite coating on ceramics, metals and polymers utilizing a biological process. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1:233–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kokubo T (1991) Bioactive glass-ceramics - properties and applications. Biomaterials 12:155–163PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ohtsuki C, Kamitakahara M, Miyazaki T (2007) Coating bone-like apatite onto organic substrates using solutions mimicking body fluid. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 1:33–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Reis RL et al (1997) Treatments to induce the nucleation and growth of apatite-like layers on polymeric surfaces and foams. J Mater Sci Mater Med 8:897–905PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Martins AM et al (2012) Gradual pore formation in natural origin scaffolds throughout subcutaneous implantation. J Biomed Mater Res A 100A:599–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Martins AM et al (2009) Chitosan scaffolds incorporating lysozyme into CaP coatings produced by a biomimetic route: A novel concept for tissue engineering combining a self-regulated degradation system with in situ pore formation. Acta Biomater 5:3328–3336PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Martins AM et al (2009) Natural stimulus responsive scaffolds/cells for bone tissue engineering: influence of lysozyme upon scaffold degradation and osteogenic differentiation of cultured marrow stromal cells induced by CaP coatings. Tissue Eng Part A 15:1953–1963PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Martins AM et al (2006) Lysozyme incorporation in biomimetic coated chitosan scaffolds: development and behaviour in contact with osteoblastic-like cells. Tissue Eng 12:1018–1019Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Araujo JV et al (2007) Surface controlled biomimetic coating of polycaprolactone nanofiber mesh architectures. Tissue Eng 13:1759–1759Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Azevedo HS et al (2005) Incorporation of proteins and enzymes at different stages of the preparation of calcium phosphate coatings on a degradable substrate by a biomimetic methodology. Mater Sci Eng C Biomim Supramol Syst 25:169–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Azevedo HS, Leonor IB, Reis RL (2006) Incorporation of proteins with different isoelectric points into biomimetic Ca-P coatings: a new approach to produce hybrid coatings with tailored properties. Bioceramics 18(Pts 1 and 2):309–311, 755–758Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Leonor IB et al (2004) Learning from nature how to design biomimetic calcium-phosphate coatings. Learn Nat How Design New Implantable Biomater Biominer Fundam Biomim Mater Process Routes 171:123–150Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Leonor IB, Reis RL (2003) An innovative auto-catalytic deposition route to produce calcium-phosphate coatings on polymeric biomaterials. J Mater Sci Mater Med 14:435–441PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Martins AM et al (2008) Natural origin scaffolds with in situ pore forming capability for bone tissue engineering applications. Acta Biomater 4:1637–1645PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Habibovic P et al (2005) Biological performance of uncoated and octacalcium phosphate-coated Ti6A14V. Biomaterials 26:23–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liu Y, de Groot K, Hunziker EB (2005) BMP-2 liberated from biomimetic implant coatings induces and sustains direct ossification in an ectopic rat model. Bone 36:745–757PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Habibovic P, de Groot K (2007) Osteoinductive biomaterials—properties and relevance in bone repair. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 1:25–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Oliveira AL et al (1999) Surface modification tailors the characteristics of biomimetic coatings nucleated on starch-based polymers. J Mater Sci Mater Med 10:827–835PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Xie J et al (2002) FTIR/ATR study of protein adsorption and brushite transformation to hydroxyapatite. Biomaterials 23:3609–3616PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mann S (2001) Biomineralization. Principles and concepts in bioinorganic materials chemistry. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.3B’s Research Group - Biomaterials, Biodegradables and BiomimeticsHeadquarters of the European Institute of Excellence on Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, University of MinhoGuimarãesPortugal

Personalised recommendations