Abstract
The confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) has enormous potential in many biological fields. When tests are made to evaluate the performance of a CLSM, the usual subjective assessment is accomplished by using a histological test slide to create a “pretty picture.” Without the use of functional tests, many of the machines could be working at suboptimal performance levels, delivering suboptimum performance and possibly misleading data. To replace the subjectivity in evaluating a confocal microscope, tests were derived or perfected that measure field illumination, lens clarity, laser power, laser stability, dichroic functionality, spectral registration, axial resolution, scanning stability, photomultiplier tube quality, overall machine stability, and system noise. These tests will help serve as a guide for other investigators to ensure that their machines are working correctly to provide data that are accurate with the necessary resolution, sensitivity, and precision. Utilization of this proposed testing approach will help eliminate the subjective nature of assessing the CLSM and allow different machines to be compared. These tests are essential if one is to make intensity measurements.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Zucker, R. M. and Price, O. T. (2001) Evaluation of confocal system performance. Cytometry 44, 273–294.
Zucker, R. M. and Price O. T. (2001) Statistical evaluation of confocal microscopy images. Cytometry 44, 295–308.
Zucker, R. M. and Price, O. T. (1999) Practical confocal microscopy and the evaluation of system performance. Methods 18, 447–458.
Centroze, V. and Pawley J. (1995) Tutorial on practical confocal microscopy and use of the confocal test specimen, in Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy, 2nd ed. (Pawley, J., ed.), Plenum, New York, pp. 559–567.
Centroze, V. and Pawley, J. (1998) Practical laser scanning confocal light microscopy: obtaining optimum performance from your instrument, in Cell Biology, 2nd ed. (Celis, J., ed.), Academic, New York, Vol. 3, pp. 149–169.
Sheppard, C. J. R. and Shotton, D. M. (1997) Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy, Bios Scientific, New York.
Marjlof, L. and Forsgren, P. O. (1993) Accurate imaging in confocal microscopy, in Methods of Cell Biology (Matsumoto, B., ed.), Academic, San Diego, CA. pp. 79–95.
Carter, D. (1999) Practical considerations for collecting confocal images, in Confocal Microscopy Methods and Protocols (Paddock, S., ed.), Methods in Molecular Biology Vol. 122, Humana, Totowa, NJ, pp. 35–57.
Pawley, J. (1995) Fundamental limits in confocal microscopy in Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy, 2nd ed. (Pawley, J., ed.), Plenum, New York, pp. 19–36.
Pawley, J. (2000) The 39 steps: a cautionary tale of quantitative 3-D fluorescence microscopy. Biotechniques 28(5), 884–886.
Swedlow, J. R., Hu, D., Andrews, P. D., Roos, D. S., and Murray, J. M. (2002) Measuring tubulin content in Toxoplasma gondii: a comparison of laser scanning confocal microscopy and wide field fluorescence microscopy. PNAS 99, 2014–2019.
White, N. S., Errington, R. J., Fricker, M. D., and Wood, J. L. Aberration control in quantitative imaging of botanical specimens by multi dimensional fluorescence microscopy. J. Microsc 181, 99–116.
Piston, D. W. (1998) Choosing objective lenses: the importance of numerical aperture and magnification in digital optical microscopy. Biol. Bull. 195(1), 1–4.
Czader, M., Liljeborg, A., Auer, G., and Porwit, A. (1996) Confocal 3-dimensional DNA image cytometry in thick tissue sections. Cytometry 25(3), 246–253.
Shapiro, H. (1995) Practical Flow Cytometry, 3rd ed., Wiley-Liss, New York.
Watson, J. V. (1991) Introduction to Flow Cytometry, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Muirhead, K. (1993) Quality control for clinical flow cytometry, in Clinical Flow Cytometry Principles and Applications (Bauer, K. D., Duque, R. E., and Shankey, T. V., eds.), Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD.
Russ, J. C. (1998) Image Processing Handbook, 3rd ed., CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
Pawley, J. B. (1994) Sources of noise in three dimensional microscope data sets, in Three Dimensional Confocal Microscopy: Volume Investigations of Biological Specimens, Academic, New York.
Watson, J. V. (1992) Flow Cytometry Data Analysis: Basic Concepts and Statistics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Art, J. (1995) Photon detectors for confocal microscopy, in Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy, 2nd ed. (Pawley, J., ed), Plenum, New York, pp. 183–195.
Cardullo, R. A. and Alm, E. J. (1998) Introduction to image processing, in Methods in Cell Biology (Sluder, G., and Wolf, D. E., ed.), Academic, New York. Vol 56, 99–115.
Steyger, P. (1999) Assessing confocal microscopy systems for purchase. Methods 18(4), 435–446.
Lerner, J. L. and Zucher, R. M. (2004) Calibration and validation of spectroscopic imaging. Cytometry 62, 8–34.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Humana Press Inc.
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Zucker, R.M. (2006). Evaluation of Confocal Microscopy System Performance. In: Taatjes, D.J., Mossman, B.T. (eds) Cell Imaging Techniques. Methods in Molecular Biology™, vol 319. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-993-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-993-6_5
Publisher Name: Humana Press
Print ISBN: 978-1-58829-157-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-993-6
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols