Abstract
Maintenance of genomic integrity depends on the spatiotemporal recruitment and regulation of DNA damage response and repair proteins at DNA damage sites. These highly dynamic processes have been widely studied using laser microirradiation coupled with fluorescence microscopy. Laser microirradiation has provided a powerful methodology to identify and determine mechanisms of DNA damage response pathways. Here we describe methods used to analyze protein recruitment dynamics of fluorescently tagged or endogenous proteins to laser-induced DNA damage sites using laser scanning and fluorescence microscopy. We further describe multiple applications employing these techniques to study additional processes at DNA damage sites including transcription. Together, we aim to provide robust visualization methods employing laser-microirradiation to detect and determine protein behavior, functions and dynamics in response to DNA damage in mammalian cells.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Hoeijmakers JH (2001) Genome maintenance mechanisms for preventing cancer. Nature 411(6835):366–374. https://doi.org/10.1038/35077232
Ciccia A, Elledge SJ (2010) The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives. Mol Cell 40(2):179–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.019
Jackson SP, Bartek J (2009) The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease. Nature 461(7267):1071–1078. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08467
Polo SE, Jackson SP (2011) Dynamics of DNA damage response proteins at DNA breaks: a focus on protein modifications. Genes Dev 25(5):409–433. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.2021311
Sulli G, Di Micco R, d’Adda di Fagagna F (2012) Crosstalk between chromatin state and DNA damage response in cellular senescence and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 12(10):709–720. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3344
Aleksandrov R, Dotchev A, Poser I, Krastev D, Georgiev G, Panova G, Babukov Y, Danovski G, Dyankova T, Hubatsch L, Ivanova A, Atemin A, Nedelcheva-Veleva MN, Hasse S, Sarov M, Buchholz F, Hyman AA, Grill SW, Stoynov SS (2018) Protein dynamics in complex DNA lesions. Mol Cell 69(6):1046–1061.e1045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2018.02.016
Petrini JH, Stracker TH (2003) The cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks: defining the sensors and mediators. Trends Cell Biol 13(9):458–462
Lee JH, Paull TT (2005) ATM activation by DNA double-strand breaks through the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex. Science 308(5721):551–554. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1108297
Rogakou EP, Pilch DR, Orr AH, Ivanova VS, Bonner WM (1998) DNA double-stranded breaks induce histone H2AX phosphorylation on serine 139. J Biol Chem 273(10):5858–5868
Jackson SP, Durocher D (2013) Regulation of DNA damage responses by ubiquitin and SUMO. Mol Cell 49(5):795–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2013.01.017
Kolas NK, Chapman JR, Nakada S, Ylanko J, Chahwan R, Sweeney FD, Panier S, Mendez M, Wildenhain J, Thomson TM, Pelletier L, Jackson SP, Durocher D (2007) Orchestration of the DNA-damage response by the RNF8 ubiquitin ligase. Science 318(5856):1637–1640. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1150034
Wang B, Elledge SJ (2007) Ubc13/Rnf8 ubiquitin ligases control foci formation of the Rap80/Abraxas/Brca1/Brcc36 complex in response to DNA damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104(52):20759–20763. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0710061104
Gassman NR, Wilson SH (2015) Micro-irradiation tools to visualize base excision repair and single-strand break repair. DNA Repair (Amst) 31:52–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2015.05.001
Mistrik M, Vesela E, Furst T, Hanzlikova H, Frydrych I, Gursky J, Majera D, Bartek J (2016) Cells and stripes: a novel quantitative photo-manipulation technique. Sci Rep 6:19567. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19567
Svejstrup JQ (2010) The interface between transcription and mechanisms maintaining genome integrity. Trends Biochem Sci 35(6):333–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2010.02.001
Shanbhag NM, Rafalska-Metcalf IU, Balane-Bolivar C, Janicki SM, Greenberg RA (2010) ATM-dependent chromatin changes silence transcription in cis to DNA double-strand breaks. Cell 141(6):970–981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.04.038
Gong F, Chiu LY, Cox B, Aymard F, Clouaire T, Leung JW, Cammarata M, Perez M, Agarwal P, Brodbelt JS, Legube G, Miller KM (2015) Screen identifies bromodomain protein ZMYND8 in chromatin recognition of transcription-associated DNA damage that promotes homologous recombination. Genes Dev 29(2):197–211. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.252189.114
Gong F, Clouaire T, Aguirrebengoa M, Legube G, Miller KM (2017) Histone demethylase KDM5A regulates the ZMYND8-NuRD chromatin remodeler to promote DNA repair. J Cell Biol 216(7):1959–1974. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201611135
Gong F, Miller KM (2018) Double duty: ZMYND8 in the DNA damage response and cancer. Cell Cycle 17(4):414–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/15384101.2017.1376150
Adam S, Dabin J, Chevallier O, Leroy O, Baldeyron C, Corpet A, Lomonte P, Renaud O, Almouzni G, Polo SE (2016) Real-time tracking of parental histones reveals their contribution to chromatin integrity following DNA damage. Mol Cell 64(1):65–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2016.08.019
Britton S, Coates J, Jackson SP (2013) A new method for high-resolution imaging of Ku foci to decipher mechanisms of DNA double-strand break repair. J Cell Biol 202(3):579–595. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201303073
Kong X, Cruz GMS, Silva BA, Wakida NM, Khatibzadeh N, Berns MW, Yokomori K (2018) Laser microirradiation to study in vivo cellular responses to simple and complex DNA damage. J Vis Exp (131). https://doi.org/10.3791/56213
Lukas C, Bartek J, Lukas J (2005) Imaging of protein movement induced by chromosomal breakage: tiny ‘local’ lesions pose great ‘global’ challenges. Chromosoma 114(3):146–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00412-005-0011-y
Xie S, Mortusewicz O, Ma HT, Herr P, Poon RY, Helleday T, Qian C (2015) Timeless interacts with PARP-1 to promote homologous recombination repair. Mol Cell 60(1):163–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2015.07.031
Dobbin MM, Madabhushi R, Pan L, Chen Y, Kim D, Gao J, Ahanonu B, Pao PC, Qiu Y, Zhao Y, Tsai LH (2013) SIRT1 collaborates with ATM and HDAC1 to maintain genomic stability in neurons. Nat Neurosci 16(8):1008–1015. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3460
Wang WY, Pan L, Su SC, Quinn EJ, Sasaki M, Jimenez JC, Mackenzie IR, Huang EJ, Tsai LH (2013) Interaction of FUS and HDAC1 regulates DNA damage response and repair in neurons. Nat Neurosci 16(10):1383–1391. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3514
Hustedt N, Durocher D (2016) The control of DNA repair by the cell cycle. Nat Cell Biol 19(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb3452
Acknowledgments
The K.M.M. laboratory is supported by the NIH National Cancer Institute (R01CA198279 and RO1CA201268) and the American Cancer Society (RSG-16-042-01-DMC).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Kim, J.J., Kumbhar, R., Gong, F., Miller, K.M. (2019). In Time and Space: Laser Microirradiation and the DNA Damage Response. In: Balakrishnan, L., Stewart, J. (eds) DNA Repair. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1999. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9500-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9500-4_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-9499-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-9500-4
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols