Abstract
Dental pulp (DP) is a specialized, highly vascularized, and innervated connective tissue mainly composed of undifferentiated mesenchymal cells, fibroblasts, and highly differentiated dentin-forming odontoblasts. Undifferentiated mesenchymal cells include stem/stromal cell populations usually called dental pulp mesenchymal stem cells (DP-MSCs) which differ in their self-renewal properties, lineage commitment, and differentiation capabilities. Analysis of surface antigens has been largely used to precisely identify these DP-MSC populations. However, a major difficulty is that these antigens are actually not specific for MSCs. Most of the markers used are indeed shared by other cell populations such as progenitor cells, mature fibroblasts, and/or perivascular cells. Accordingly, the detection of only one of these markers in a cell population is clearly insufficient to determine its stemness. Recent data reported that multiparametric flow cytometry, by allowing for the detection of several molecules on the surface of one single cell, is a powerful tool to elucidate the phenotype of a cell population both in vivo and in vitro. So far, DP-MSC populations have been characterized mainly based on the isolated expression of molecules known to be expressed by stem cells, such as Stro-1 antigen, melanoma cell adhesion molecule MCAM/CD146, low-affinity nerve growth factor receptor p75NTR/CD271, and the mesenchymal stem cell antigen MSCA-1. Using multiparametric flow cytometry, we recently showed that human DP-MSCs are indeed phenotypically heterogeneous and form several populations.
The present paper describes the multiparametric flow cytometry protocol we routinely use for characterizing DP-MSCs. The description includes the design of the antibody panel and explains the selection of the different parameters related to the data quality control.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsSpringer Nature is developing a new tool to find and evaluate Protocols. Learn more
References
Gronthos S, Mankani M, Brahim J, Robey PG, Shi S (2000) Postnatal human dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) in vitro and in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:13625–13630
Huang GTJ, Gronthos S, Shi S (2009) Mesenchymal stem cells derived from dental tissues vs. those from other sources: their biology and role in regenerative medicine. J Dent Res 88:792–806
Kawashima N (2012) Characterisation of dental pulp stem cells: A new horizon for tissue regeneration? Arch Oral Biol 57:1439–1458
Ducret M, Fabre H, Degoul O, Atzeni G, McGuckin C, Forraz N et al (2016) Immunophenotyping reveals the diversity of human dental pulp mesenchymal stromal cells in vivo and their evolution upon in vitro amplification. Front Physiol 8(7):512
Dominici M, Le Blanc K, Mueller I, Slaper-Cortenbach I, Marini F, Krause D et al (2006) Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for cellular therapy position statement. Cytotherapy 8:315–317
Al-Nbaheen M, Vishnubalaji R, Ali D, Bouslimi A, Al-Jassir F, Megges M et al (2013) Human stromal (mesenchymal) stem cells from bone marrow, adipose tissue and skin exhibit differences in molecular phenotype and differentiation potential. Stem Cell Rev 9:32–43
Lv FJ, Tuan RS, Cheung KM, Leung VY (2014) Concise Review: the surface markers and identity of human mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells 32:1408–1419
Torre ML, Lucarelli E, Guidi S, Ferrari M, Alessandri G, De Girolamo L et al (2015) Ex vivo expanded mesenchymal stromal cell minimal quality requirements for clinical application. Stem Cells Dev 24:677–685
Alamo AL, Melnick SJ (2000) Clinical application of four and five-color flow cytometry lymphocyte subset immunophenotyping. Cytometry 42:363–370
Baumgarth N, Roederer M (2000) A practical approach to multicolor flow cytometry for immunophenotyping. J Immunol Methods 243:77–97
Roederer M (2001) Spectral compensation for flow cytometry: visualization artifacts, limitations, and caveats. Cytometry 205:194–205
Hulspas R, O’Gorman MRG, Wood BL, Gratama JW, Robert Sutherland D (2009) Considerations for the control of background fluorescence in clinical flow cytometry. Cytometry B Clin Cytom 76:355–364
Hulspas R (2010) Titration of fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies for labeling cell surface markers on live cells. Curr Protoc Cytom 54:6.29.1–6.29.9
Hughes OR, Stewart R, Dimmick I, Jones EA (2009) A critical appraisal of factors affecting the accuracy of results obtained when using flow cytometry in stem cell investigations: where do you put your gates? Cytometry 75:803–810
Nestler L, Evege E, Mclaughlin J, Munroe D, Tan T, Wagner K et al (2004) TrypLE TM express: a temperature stable replacement for animal trypsin in cell dissociation applications. Quest 1:42–47
Maecker H, Trotter J (2006) Flow cytometry controls, instrument setup, and the determination of positivity. Cytometry 69:1037–1042
Maecker H, Trotter J (2009) Selecting reagents for multicolor BD flow cytometry. Postepy Biochem 55:461–467
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Ducret, M. et al. (2019). Phenotypic Identification of Dental Pulp Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells Subpopulations with Multiparametric Flow Cytometry. In: Papagerakis, P. (eds) Odontogenesis. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1922. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9012-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9012-2_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-9011-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-9012-2
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols