Skip to main content

Cognitive Assessment in Alzheimer’s Disease Clinical Trials

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
  • 2764 Accesses

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 1750))

Abstract

Many tests are available for the assessment of cognitive function. This chapter describes the common features and practical requirements of test administration, key considerations in the selection and interpretation of tests, and their application in Alzheimer’s disease drug development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Protocol
USD   49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Springer Nature is developing a new tool to find and evaluate Protocols. Learn more

References

  1. Kipps CM, Hodges JR (2005) Cognitive assessment for clinicians. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 76(Suppl I):i22–i30

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Randolph C (1998) Repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status: manual. Pearson, Bloomington

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stern RA, White T (2003) Neuropsychological assessment battery: administration, scoring, and interpretation manual. PAR, Inc., Lutz, FL

    Google Scholar 

  4. Benedict R, Brandt J (1997) Brief visuospatial memory test—revised (BVMT-R). PAR, Inc., Lutz, FL

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wechsler D (1997) Wechsler memory scale—third edition (WMS–III) administration and scoring manual. The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX

    Google Scholar 

  6. Knight C, Alderman N, Burgess PW (2002) Development of a simplified version of the multiple errands test for use in hospital settings. Neuropsychol Rehabil 12(3):231–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Reitan RM, Wolfson D (1985) The Halstead–Reitan neuropsychological test battery: theory and clinical interpretation. Neuropsychological Press, Tucson, AZ

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wechsler D (2008) Wechsler adult intelligence scale—fourth edition (WAIS-IV) administration and scoring manual. The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX

    Google Scholar 

  9. Folstein M, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12(3):189–198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bartels C, Wegrzyn M, Wiedl A, Ackermann V, Ehrenreich H (2010) Practice effects in healthy adults: a longitudinal study on frequent repetitive cognitive testing. BMC Neurosci 11:118

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Beglinger LJ, Gaydos B, Tangphao-Daniels O et al (2005) Practice effects and the use of alternate forms in serial neuropsychological testing. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 20(4):517–529

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M et al (1984) Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA work group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 34(7):939–944

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dubois B, Feldman HH, Jacova C et al (2007) Research criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: revising the NINCDS-ADRDA criteria. Lancet Neurol 6(8):734–746

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Simard M (1998) The mini-mental state examination: strengths and weaknesses of a clinical instrument. Can Alzheimer Dis Rev 12:10–12

    Google Scholar 

  15. Donohue MC, Sperling RA, Salmon DP et al (2014) The preclinical Alzheimer cognitive composite: measuring amyloid-related decline. JAMA Neurol 71(8):961–970

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Fray PJ, Robbins TW, Sahakian BJ (1996) Neuropsychiatric applications of CANTAB. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 11:329–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Harrison J, Minassian SL, Jenkins L, Black RS, Koller M, Grundman M (2007) A neuropsychological test battery for use in Alzheimer disease clinical trials. Arch Neurol 64(9):1323–1329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geraint Price .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this protocol

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this protocol

Price, G. (2018). Cognitive Assessment in Alzheimer’s Disease Clinical Trials. In: Perneczky, R. (eds) Biomarkers for Alzheimer’s Disease Drug Development. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1750. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7704-8_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7704-8_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-7703-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-7704-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics