Skip to main content

Computational Reprogramming of T Cell Antigen Receptor Binding Properties

  • Protocol
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 1414))

Abstract

T-cell receptor (TCR) binding to peptide/MHC is key to antigen-specific cellular immunity, and there has been considerable interest in modulating TCR affinity and specificity for the development of therapeutics and imaging reagents. While in vitro engineering efforts using molecular evolution have yielded remarkable improvements in TCR affinity, such approaches do not offer structural control and can adversely affect receptor specificity, particularly if the attraction towards the MHC is enhanced independently of the peptide. Here we describe an approach to computational design that begins with structural information and offers the potential for more controlled manipulation of binding properties. Our design process models point mutations in selected regions of the TCR and ranks the resulting change in binding energy. Consideration is given to designing optimized scoring functions tuned to particular TCR-peptide/MHC interfaces. Validation of highly ranked predictions can be used to refine the modeling methodology and scoring functions, improving the design process. Our approach results in a strong correlation between predicted and measured changes in binding energy, as well as good agreement between modeled and experimental structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Protocol
USD   49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Springer Nature is developing a new tool to find and evaluate Protocols. Learn more

References

  1. Aleksic M, Dushek O, Zhang H et al (2010) Dependence of T cell antigen recognition on T cell receptor-peptide MHC confinement time. Immunity 32:163–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Stone JD, Kranz DM (2013) Role of T cell receptor affinity in the efficacy and specificity of adoptive T cell therapies. Front Immunol 4:244

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Holler PD, Holman PO, Shusta EV et al (2000) In vitro evolution of a T cell receptor with high affinity for peptide/MHC. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:5387–5392

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Chlewicki LK, Holler PD, Monti BC et al (2005) High-affinity, peptide-specific T cell receptors can be generated by mutations in CDR1, CDR2 or CDR3. J Mol Biol 346:223–239

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Li Y, Moysey R, Molloy PE et al (2005) Directed evolution of human T-cell receptors with picomolar affinities by phage display. Nat Biotechnol 23:349–354

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Varela-Rohena A, Molloy PE, Dunn SM et al (2008) Control of HIV-1 immune escape by CD8 T cells expressing enhanced T-cell receptor. Nat Med 14:1390–1395

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhao Y, Bennett AD, Zheng Z et al (2007) High-affinity TCRs generated by phage display provide CD4+ T cells with the ability to recognize and kill tumor cell lines. J Immunol 179:5845–5854

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Morgan RA, Dudley ME, Wunderlich JR et al (2006) Cancer regression in patients after transfer of genetically engineered lymphocytes. Science 314:126–129

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Liddy N, Bossi G, Adams KJ et al (2012) Monoclonal TCR-redirected tumor cell killing. Nat Med 18:980–987

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Michielin O (2007) Application of molecular modeling to new therapeutic cancer approaches. Bull Cancer 94:763–768

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Haidar JN, Pierce B, Yu Y et al (2009) Structure‐based design of a T‐cell receptor leads to nearly 100‐fold improvement in binding affinity for pepMHC. Proteins 74:948–960

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Malecek K, Grigoryan A, Zhong S et al (2014) Specific increase in potency via structure-based design of a TCR. J Immunol 193:2587–2599

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Pierce BG, Hellman LM, Hossain M et al (2014) Computational design of the affinity and specificity of a therapeutic T cell receptor. PLoS Comput Biol 10:e1003478

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Piepenbrink KH, Blevins SJ, Scott DR et al (2013) The basis for limited specificity and MHC restriction in a T cell receptor interface. Nat Commun 4:1948

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Kaufmann KW, Lemmon GH, Deluca SL et al (2010) Practically useful: what the Rosetta protein modeling suite can do for you. Biochemistry 49:2987–2998

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Borbulevych OY, Santhanagopolan SM, Hossain M et al (2011) TCRs used in cancer gene therapy cross-react with MART-1/Melan-A tumor antigens via distinct mechanisms. J Immunol 187:2453–2463

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Scott DR, Borbulevych OY, Piepenbrink KH et al (2011) Disparate degrees of hypervariable loop flexibility control T-cell receptor cross-reactivity, specificity, and binding mechanism. J Mol Biol 414:385–400

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Adams J, Narayanan S, Liu B et al (2011) T cell receptor signaling is limited by docking geometry to peptide-major histocompatibility complex. Immunity 35:681–693

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Burrows SR, Chen Z, Archbold JK et al (2010) Hard wiring of T cell receptor specificity for the major histocompatibility complex is underpinned by TCR adaptability. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:10608–10613

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Borbulevych OY, Piepenbrink KH, Gloor BE et al (2009) T cell receptor cross-reactivity directed by antigen-dependent tuning of peptide-MHC molecular flexibility. Immunity 31:885–896

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Sammond DW, Eletr ZM, Purbeck C et al (2007) Structure-based protocol for identifying mutations that enhance protein–protein binding affinities. J Mol Biol 371:1392–1404

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Chaudhury S, Lyskov S, Gray JJ (2010) PyRosetta: a script-based interface for implementing molecular modeling algorithms using Rosetta. Bioinformatics 26:689–691

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Leaver-Fay A, O’meara MJ, Tyka M et al (2013) Scientific benchmarks for guiding macromolecular energy function improvement. Methods Enzymol 523:109

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Giudicelli V, Duroux P, Ginestoux C et al (2006) IMGT/LIGM-DB, the IMGT® comprehensive database of immunoglobulin and T cell receptor nucleotide sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 34:D781–D784

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Kellogg EH, Leaver‐Fay A, Baker D (2011) Role of conformational sampling in computing mutation‐induced changes in protein structure and stability. Proteins 79:830–838

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Computational structural immunology in the authors’ laboratories is supported by NIH grants R01GM103773 and R01GM067079 and an award from the Carole and Ray Neag Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of Connecticut. TPR is supported by a fellowship from the Indiana CTSI, funded in part by NIH grant UL1TR001108.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian M. Baker .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Riley, T.P., Singh, N.K., Pierce, B.G., Baker, B.M., Weng, Z. (2016). Computational Reprogramming of T Cell Antigen Receptor Binding Properties. In: Stoddard, B. (eds) Computational Design of Ligand Binding Proteins. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1414. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3569-7_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3569-7_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-3567-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-3569-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics