Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Advanced Control of Continuous Pharmaceutical Tablet Manufacturing Processes

  • Protocol
Process Simulation and Data Modeling in Solid Oral Drug Development and Manufacture

Part of the book series: Methods in Pharmacology and Toxicology ((MIPT))

Abstract

A novel manufacturing strategy based on continuous processing, integrated with online/inline monitoring tools, coupled with an advanced automatic feedback control system is highly desired for efficient Quality by Design (QbD)-based manufacturing of the next generation of pharmaceutical products with optimal consumption of time, space and resources. In this work, an advanced hybrid MPC-PID control system as well as a simpler PID controller for a direct compaction continuous tablet manufacturing process has been designed and implemented for a pilot-scale pharmaceutical process. An NIR sensor, an online NIR prediction tool, a PAT data management tool, an OPC communication protocol, a standard control platform and control hardware have been used to close the control loop. A systematic methodology to design and implement the control system has been also proposed. A control framework with features such as the option to run the plant in open-loop as well as in a closed-loop scenario has been developed. Furthermore, within the closed-loop scenario, options for a simpler PID, a dead time compensator (Smith predictor) as well as an advanced model predictive controller have been included. The feature to run the control strategy in simulation mode has been added to the control platform to facilitate virtual control system design and performance evaluation. Two case studies involving a direct compaction continuous tablet manufacturing process have been considered to demonstrate the closed-loop operation. Case Study 1 was completed at Rutgers University and constituted the use of a continuous cylindrical blender with a rotating screw. Case Study 2 was based on a continuous tumble mixer and was completed at the University of Puerto Rico—Mayaguez Campus (UPRM).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. PhRMA profile (2012). Washington DC, http://phrma.org/sites/default/files/pdf/PhRMA%20Profile%202013.pdf. Accessed 26 September 2013.

  2. FDA (2004). Challenge and opportunity on the critical path to new medical products. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/ScienceResearch/ResearchAreas/ucm079290.pdf. Accessed 26 September 2013.

  3. Singh R, Godfrey A, Gregertsen B, Muller F, Gernaey KV, Gani R, Woodley JM (2013) Systematic substrate adoption methodology (SAM) for future flexible, generic pharmaceutical production processes. Comput Chem Eng 58:344–368

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Singh R, Sahay A, Muzzio F, Ierapetritou M, Ramachandran R (2013) Systematic framework for onsite design and implementation of the control system in continuous tablet manufacturing process. Comput Chem Eng 66:186–200

    Google Scholar 

  5. Singh R, Ierapetritou M, Ramachandran R (2013) System-wide hybrid model predictive control of a continuous pharmaceutical tablet manufacturing process via direct compaction. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 85(3):1164–1182

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Singh R, Ierapetritou MG, Ramachandran R (2012) An engineering study on the enhanced control and operation of continuous manufacturing of pharmaceutical tablets via roller compaction. Int J Pharm 438(1-2):307–326

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Charoo NA, Shamsher AAA, Zidan AS, Rahman Z (2012) Quality by design approach for formulation development: a case study of dispersible tablets. Int J Pharm 423:167–178

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Singh R, Gernaey KV, Gani R (2009) Model-based computer-aided framework for design of process monitoring and analysis systems. Comput Chem Eng 33(1):22–42

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. FDA/CDER (2005) Process Analytical Technology - (PAT) initiative. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/OfficeofMedicalProductsandTobacco/CDER/ucm088828.htm. Accessed 19 June 2012

  10. Gnoth S, Jenzsch M, Simutis R, Lübbert A (2007) Process Analytical Technology (PAT): batch-to-batch reproducibility of fermentation processes by robust process operational design and control. J Biotechnol 132(2):180–186

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. FDA (2004) Guidance for industry: PAT-A framework for innovative pharmaceutical manufacturing & quality assurance. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ucm070305.pdf. Accessed 19 June 2012

  12. Muzzio F, Singh R, Chaudhury A, Rogers A, Ramachandran R, Ierapetritou MG (2013) PharmTech magazine Europe 37(6): 40–41. http://www.pharmtech.com/pharmtech/Man-ufacturing/Model-Predictive-Design-Control-and-Optimization/ArticleStandard/Article/detail/814906. Accessed 04 October 2013

  13. Boukouvala F, Chaudhury A, Sen M, Zhou R, Mioduszewski L, Ierapetritou M, Ramachandran R (2013) Computer-aided flowsheet simulation of a pharmaceutical tablet manufacturing process incorporating wet granulation. J Pharm Innov 8(1):11–27

    Google Scholar 

  14. Boukouvala F, Niotis V, Ramachandran R, Muzzio F, Ierapetritou M (2012) An integrated approach for dynamic flowsheet modeling and sensitivity analysis of a continuous tablet manufacturing process: an integrated approach. Comput Chem Eng 42:30–47

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Boukouvala F, Ramachandran R, Vanarase A, Muzzio FJ, Ierapetritou M (2011) Computer aided design and analysis of continuous pharmaceutical manufacturing processes. Comput Aid Chem Eng 29:216–220

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sen M, Dubey A, Singh R, Ramachandran R (2013). Mathematical development and comparison of a hybrid PBM-DEM description of a continuous powder mixing process. J Powder Technol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/843784

  17. Sen M, Ramachandran R (2012) A multi-dimensional population balance model approach to continuous powder mixing processes. Adv Powder Technol 24(1):51–59

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sen M, Singh R, Vanarase A, John J, Ramachandran R (2012) Multi-dimensional population balance modeling and experimental validation of continuous powder mixing processes. Chem Eng Sci 80:349–360

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Barrasso D, Ramachandran R (2012) A comparison of model order reduction techniques for a four-dimensional population balance model describing multi-component wet granulation processes. Chem Eng Sci 80:380–392

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Barrasso D, Walia S, Ramachandran R (2013) Multi-component population balance modeling of continuous granulation processes: a parametric study and comparison with experimental trends. Powder Technol 241:85–97

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Portillo PM, Vanarase A, Ingram A, Seville JK, Ierapetritou MG, Muzzio FJ (2010) Investigation of the effect of impeller rotation rate, powder flow rate, and cohesion on powder flow behavior in a continuous blender using PEPT. Chem Eng Sci 65:5658–5668

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Vanarase AU, Alcala M, Rozo J, Muzzio FJ, Romanach RJ (2010) Real-time monitoring of drug concentration in a continuous powder mixing process using NIR spectroscopy. Chem Eng Sci 65:5728–5733

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Vanarase A, Muzzio FJ (2011) Effect of operating conditions and design parameters in a continuous powder mixer. Powder Technol 208:26–36

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Vanarase A, Gao Y, Muzzio FJ, Ierapetritou MG (2011) Characterizing continuous powder mixing using residence time distribution. Chem Eng Sci 66(3):417–425

    Google Scholar 

  25. Singh R, Gernaey KV, Gani R (2010) ICAS-PAT: a software for design, analysis & validation of PAT systems. Comput Chem Eng 34(7):1108–1136

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hsu S, Reklaitis GV, Venkatasubramanian V (2010) Modeling and control of roller compaction for pharmaceutical manufacturing. Part I: process dynamics and control framework. J Pharm Innov 5:14–23

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hsu S, Reklaitis GV, Venkatasubramanian V (2010) Modeling and control of roller compaction for pharmaceutical manufacturing. Part II: control and system design. J Pharm Innov 5:24–36

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ramachandran R, Chaudhury A (2012) Model-based design and control of continuous drum granulation processes. Chem Eng Res Des 90(8):1063–1073

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Burggraeve A, Tavares da Silva A, Van den Kerkhof T, Hellings M, Vervaet C, Remon JP, Vander Heyden Y, Beer TD (2012) Development of a fluid bed granulation process control strategy based on real-time process and product measurements. Talanta 100:293–302

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bardin M, Knight PC, Seville JPK (2004) On control of particle size distribution in granulation using high-shear mixers. Powder Technol 140(3):169–175

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Sanders CFW, Hounslow MJ, Doyle FJ III (2009) Identification of models for control of wet granulation. Powder Technol 188(3):255–263

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Long CE, Polisetty PK, Gatzke EP (2007) Deterministic global optimization for nonlinear model predictive control of hybrid dynamic systems. Int J Robust Nonlin Control 17:1232–1250

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gatzke EP, Doyle FJ III (2001) Model predictive control of a granulation system using soft output constraints and prioritized control objectives. Powder Technol 121(2–3):149–158

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Pottmann M, Ogunnaike BA, Adetayo AA, Ennis BJ (2000) Model-based control of a granulation system. Powder Technol 108(2–3):192–201

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ramachandran R, Arjunan J, Chaudhury A, Ierapetritou M (2012) Model-based control loop performance assessment of a continuous direct compaction pharmaceutical processes. J Pharm Innov 6(3):249–263

    Google Scholar 

  36. Seborg DE, Edgar TF, Mellichamp DA (2004) Process dynamics and control, 2nd edn. John Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ziegler JG, Nichols B (1942) Optimum settings for automatic controllers. Trans ASME 64:759–765

    Google Scholar 

  38. Cutler CR, Ramaker BL (1979) Dynamic matrix control—a computer control algorithm. AIChE National Meeting, Houston, TX, April 1979

    Google Scholar 

  39. Prett DM, Gillette RD (1980) Optimization and constrained multivariable control of a catalytic cracking unit. AIChE National Meeting, Houston, TX, April 1979

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wojsznis W, Gudaz J, Blevins T, Mehta A (2003) Practical approach to tuning MPC. ISA Trans 42:149–162

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Singh R, Boukouvala F, Jayjock E, Ramachandran R, Ierapetritou M, Muzzio F (2012b) Flexible multipurpose continuous processing of pharmaceutical tablet manufacturing process. GMP news, European Compliance Academic (ECE). http://www.gmpcompliance.org/ecanl_503_0_news_3268_7248_n.html. Accessed 26 Sept 2013.

  42. Singh R, Boukouvala F, Jayjock E, Ramachandran R, Ierapetritou M, Muzzio F (2012c) Flexible multipurpose continuous processing. PharmPro Magazine, Pharmaceut Process 27(6): 22–25

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kawakita K, Ludde KH (1971) Some considerations on powder compression equations. Powder Technol 4:61–68

    Google Scholar 

  44. Kuentz M, Leuenberger H (2000) A new model for the hardness of a compacted particle system, applied to tablets of pharmaceutical polymers. Powder Technol 111:143–145

    Google Scholar 

  45. Kimber JA, Kazarian SG, Stepánek F (2011) Microstructure-based mathematical modelling and spectroscopic imaging of tablet dissolution. Comput Chem Eng 35:1328–1339

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Singh R, Gernaey KV, Gani R (2010) An ontological knowledge based system for selection of process monitoring and analysis tools. Comput Chem Eng 34(7):1137–1154

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Bristol E (1966) On a new measure of interaction for multivariable process control. IEEE Trans Autom Control 11(1):133–134

    Google Scholar 

  48. Blevins T, Wojsznis WK, Nixon M (2013) Advanced control foundation: tools, techniques and applications. International Society of Automation, NC, USA. ISBN ISBN: 978-1-937560-55-3

    Google Scholar 

  49. Trierweiler JO, Farina LA (2003) RPN tuning strategy for model predictive control. J Process Control 13:591–598

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Singh R, Sahay A, Karry KM, Muzzio F, Ierapetritou M, Ramachandran R (2014) Implementation of a hybrid MPC-PID control strategy using PAT tools into a direct compaction continuous pharmaceutical tablet manufacturing pilot-plant. Int J Pharm 473:38–54

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Singh R, Barrasso D, Chaudhury A, Sen M, Ierapetritou M, Ramachandran R (2014) Closed-loop feedback control of a continuous pharmaceutical tablet manufacturing process via wet granulation. J Pharm Innov 9:16–37

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Science Foundation Engineering Research Center on Structured Organic Particulate Systems (ERC-SOPS) through Grant NSF-ECC 0540855. The authors would also like to acknowledge Paul Brodbeck (CAI) and Rodolfo J. Romañach (UPRM) for their meaningful discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Engineering Research Center for Structured Organic Particulate Systems (ERC-SOPS), Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 98 Brett Road, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA

    Ravendra Singh, Abhishek Sahay, Krizia M. Karry, Fernando J. Muzzio, Marianthi G. Ierapetritou & Rohit Ramachandran

  2. Engineering Research Center for Structured Organic Particulate Systems (ERC-SOPS), Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Puerto Rico Mayaguez, Mayaguez, PR, 00681, USA

    Carlos Velazquez

Authors
  1. Ravendra Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Carlos Velazquez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Abhishek Sahay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Krizia M. Karry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Fernando J. Muzzio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Marianthi G. Ierapetritou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Rohit Ramachandran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ravendra Singh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA

    Marianthi G. Ierapetritou  & Rohit Ramachandran  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Singh, R. et al. (2016). Advanced Control of Continuous Pharmaceutical Tablet Manufacturing Processes. In: Ierapetritou, M.G., Ramachandran, R. (eds) Process Simulation and Data Modeling in Solid Oral Drug Development and Manufacture. Methods in Pharmacology and Toxicology. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2996-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2996-2_7

  • Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2995-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2996-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation