Abstract
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) constitute the largest family of receptors encoded by the human genome. Activation and inhibition of GPCRs under the physiological and pathophysiological conditions is largely mediated by chemical ligands (agonists and antagonists) that bind to the orthosteric binding pocket. Orthosteric ligands are, however, often nonspecific, binding to more than one GPCR subtype. In contrast to orthosteric agonists and antagonists, allosteric ligands do not directly compete with hormones and neurotransmitters for binding to the orthosteric binding pocket. Furthermore, allosteric ligands typically occupy structurally diverse regions of receptors and therefore are more selective for specific GPCRs, regulating receptor function in the more subtle ways by either enhancing or diminishing responses to natural ligands such as hormones or neurotransmitters. Recent X-ray crystallographic studies have provided detailed structural information regarding the nature of the orthosteric muscarinic binding site and an outer receptor cavity that can bind allosteric drugs. These new findings may guide the development of selective muscarinic receptor. The procedures involved in the production, purification, and crystallization of GPCRs are introduced here and facilitate a greater understanding of the structural basis of GPCR function.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Hopkins AL, Groom CR (2002) The druggable genome. Nat Rev Drug Discov 1(9):727–730
Klabunde T, Hessler G (2002) Drug design strategies for targeting G-protein-coupled receptors. Chembiochem 3:455–459
Bonner TI, Buckley NJ, Young AC, Brann MR (1987) Identification of a family of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor genes. Science 237(4814):527–532
Peralta EG, Winslow JW, Peterson GL, Smith DH (1987) Primary structure and biochemical property of an M2 muscarinic receptor. Science 236(4801):600–605
Bonner TI, Young AC, Brann MR, Buckley NJ (1988) Cloning and expression of the human and rat m5 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor genes. Neuron 1(5):403–410
Bonner TI (1989) The molecular basis of muscarinic receptor diversity. Trends Neurosci 12(4):148–151
Bonner TI (1989) New subtypes of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. Trends Pharmacol Sci Suppl 11:5
Wess J, Bonner TI, Dorje F, Brann MR (1990) Delineation of muscarinic receptor domains conferring selectivity of coupling to guanine nucleotide-binding proteins and second messengers. Mol Pharmacol 38(4):517–523
Wess J, Bonner TI, Brann MR (1990) Chimeric m2/m3 muscarinic receptors: role of carboxyl terminal receptor domains in selectivity of ligand binding and coupling to phosphoinositide hydrolysis. Mol Pharmacol 38(6):872–877
Wess J, Liu J, Blin N et al (1997) Structural basis of receptor/G protein coupling selectivity studied with muscarinic receptors as model systems. Life Sci 60(13–14):1007–1014
Haga K, Kruse AC, Asada H et al (2012) Structure of the human M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor bound to an antagonist. Nature 482(7386):547–551
Kruse AC, Hu J, Pan AC et al (2012) Structure and dynamics of the M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor. Nature 482(7386):547–551
Alkhalfioui F, Magnin T, Wagner R (2009) From purified GPCRs to drug discovery: the promise of protein-based methodologies. Curr Opin Pharmacol 9(5):629–635
Furukawa H, Haga T (2000) Expression of functional M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor in Escherichia coli. J Biochem 127(1):151–161
Ichiyama S, Oka Y, Haga K et al (2006) The structure of the third intracellular loop of the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2 subtype. FEBS Lett 580(1):23–26
Yurugi-Kobayashi T, Asada H, Shiroishi M et al (2009) Comparison of functional non-glycosylated GPCRs expression in Pichia pastoris. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 380(2):271–276
Hayashi MK, Haga T (1996) Purification and functional reconstitution with GTP-binding regulatory proteins of hexahistidine-tagged muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (m2 subtype). J Biochem 120(6):1232–1238
Asada H, Uemura T, Yurugi-Kobayashi T et al (2011) Evaluation of the Pichia pastoris expression system for the production of GPCRs for structural analysis. Microb Cell Fact 10:24
Kameyama K, Haga K, Haga T et al (1994) Activation of a GTP-binding protein and a GTP-binding-protein-coupled receptor kinase (β-adrenergic-receptor kinase-1) by a muscarinic receptor m2 mutant lacking phosphorylation sites. Eur J Biochem 226:267–276
Rosenbaum DM, Cherezov V, Hanson MA et al (2007) GPCR engineering yields high-resolution structural insights into β2-adrenergic receptor function. Science 318(5854):1266–1273
Ballesteros JA, Weinstein H (1995) Integrated methods for the construction of three dimensional models and computational probing of structure function relations in G protein-coupled receptors. Methods Neurosci 25:366–428
Scorer CA, Clare JJ, McCombie WR et al (1994) Rapid selection using G418 of high copy number transformants of Pichia pastoris for high-level foreign gene expression. Biotechnology (NY) 12(2):181–184
Weiss HM, Haase W, Michel H et al (1998) Comparative biochemical and pharmacological characterization of the mouse 5HT5A 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor and the human beta2-adrenergic receptor produced in the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris. Biochem J 330(Pt 3):1137–1147
Ciccarone VC, Polayes DA, Luckow VA (1998) Generation of recombinant baculovirus DNA in E. coli using a baculovirus shuttle vector. Methods Mol Med 13:213–235
Luckow VA, Lee SC, Barry GF et al (1993) Efficient generation of infectious recombinant baculoviruses by site-specific transposon-mediated insertion of foreign genes into a baculovirus genome propagated in Escherichia coli. J Virol 67(8):4566–4579
Kadwell SH, Hardwicke PI (2007) Production of baculovirus-expressed recombinant proteins in wave bioreactors. Methods Mol Biol 388:247–266
Weber W, Weber E, Geisse S et al (2002) Optimisation of protein expression and establishment of the Wave Bioreactor for Baculovirus/insect cell culture. Cytotechnology 38(1–3):77–85
Haga K, Haga T (1983) Affinity chromatography of the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor. J Biol Chem 258(22):13575–13579
Kruse AC, Ring AM, Manglik A et al (2013) Activation and allosteric modulation of a muscarinic acetylcholine receptor. Nature 504(7478):101–106
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Exploratory Research for Advanced Technology (ERATO) program of the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) (to T.K.), by the Toray Science Foundation (to T.K.), by Takeda Science Foundation (to T.K., R.S., and H.A.), by Ichiro Kanehara Foundation (to T.K.), by The Sumitomo Foundation (to T.K.), by the Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (CREST) program of the JST (to T.K.), and by the Platform for Drug Discovery, Informatics, and Structural Life Science from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan (to T.K.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
1 Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary Fig. 1
This slide shows that structure of orthosteric domains similar among M1–M5 receptor subtypes. Asp103 conserved among all amine receptor has made a salt bridge with the amine of QNB, muscarinic receptor antagonist. Asn404 conserved among all muscarinic receptors has made hydrogen bonds with hydroxyl and carbonyl of QNB. There are 14 amino acids around QNB. Except Phe181, 13 amino acids of receptor are conserved among M1–M5 receptor subtypes. To develop the subtype specific ligand, we have to target the allosteric domain, not the orthosteric domain (PPTX 5750 kb)
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Suno, R., Asada, H., Kobayashi, T. (2016). Towards the Crystal Structure Determination of Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptors. In: Myslivecek, J., Jakubik, J. (eds) Muscarinic Receptor: From Structure to Animal Models. Neuromethods, vol 107. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2858-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2858-3_1
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2857-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2858-3
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols