What is our best measurand when measuring “something” in “something”? Paul De Bièvre Editorial 24 February 2009 Pages: 177 - 178
Comparison of measurement uncertainties in direct plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol method of measurement and indirect estimation according to Friedewald equation Xavier Fuentes-ArderiuSocorro Braga-FernándezSantiago Juvé-Cuxart General Paper 21 February 2009 Pages: 179 - 183
Non-parametric estimation of reference intervals in small non-Gaussian sample sets Johan BjernerElvar TheodorssonAnders Kallner General Paper 12 February 2009 Pages: 185 - 192
Utilisation of customer feedback in a university hospital laboratory Paula Irmeli OjaTimo Tapani KouriArto Juhani Pakarinen General Paper 25 February 2009 Pages: 193 - 197
Integration of metrological principles and performance evaluation in a proficiency testing scheme in support of the Council Directive 98/83/EC Andreja DrolcMagda Cotman Practitioner's Report 21 February 2009 Pages: 199 - 205
Implementation and assessment of the quality management system in research in a laboratory of the French Food Safety Agency: application to PhD student work Jérôme HenriPascal SandersNathalie Cadieu Practitioner's Report 11 March 2009 Pages: 207 - 217
Response on “Regulations in the field of residue and doping analysis should ensure a well-defined risk of a false positive declaration” by N. M. Faber Peter Van EenooF. T. Delbeke Discussion Forum 24 December 2008 Pages: 219 - 221
Towards more fair and effective doping tests based on chromatography with mass spectrometric detection Nicolaas (Klaas) M. Faber Discussion Forum 17 March 2009 Pages: 223 - 226
Metrology in Africa: role of the CAFMET Abderafi CharkiC. Ferrierthe African Committee of Metrology International Bodies 21 February 2009 Pages: 227 - 230