The European Conference on Quality in the Spotlight in Medical Laboratories, 7–9 October 2001, Antwerp, Belgium J. C. LibeerH. M. J. Goldschmidt Editorial Pages: 429 - 430
A review of autovalidation software in laboratory medicine Henk M. J. Goldschmidt Review Paper Pages: 431 - 440
Bioanalytical method validation and its implications for forensic and clinical toxicology – A review Frank T. PetersHans H. Maurer Review Paper Pages: 441 - 449
A quality systems approach for identifying and controlling sources of error with point of care testing devices S. S. EhrmeyerRonald H. Laessig General Paper Pages: 450 - 454
Biological variation data are necessary prerequisites for objective autoverification of clinical laboratory data C. G. FraserHeather P. StevensonIan M.G. Kennedy General Paper Pages: 455 - 460
Using a learning curve approach to reduce laboratory errors Jan Krouwer General Paper Pages: 461 - 467
The quality of leadership (QL): the EFQM leadership criterion in relation to the 360° feedback evaluation method H. M. J. GoldschmidtN. C. V. PéquériauxJ. De Jongh-Leuvenink General Paper Pages: 468 - 472
The College of American Pathologists laboratory accreditation program A. Rabinovitch General Paper Pages: 473 - 476
How autoverification through the expert system VALAB can make your laboratory more efficient Laurent ProstE. Rogari General Paper Pages: 480 - 487
Importance of the choice of assumptions and models in the estimation of analytical quality specifications Per Hyltoft Petersen Practitioner’s Report Pages: 488 - 493
Getting the most from your laboratory information system in the hematology laboratory Irina Lutinger Practitioner’s Report Pages: 494 - 497
A marked difference between two populations under mass screening of neonatal TSH and biotinidase activity T. TanyalçınFrançois EyskensBenal Büyükgebiz Practitioner’s Report Pages: 498 - 506