Giving a Voice to Marginalised Groups for Health Care Decision Making Richard De Abreu LourençoNancy DevlinElisabeth Huynh Commentary 01 October 2020 Pages: 5 - 10
Generating Relevant Information from Patients in the Technology-Enhanced Era of Patient-Focused Drug Development: Opportunities and Challenges Matthew ReaneyJennifer ClineMichael Posey Current Opinion 13 October 2020 Pages: 11 - 16
Respondent Understanding in Discrete Choice Experiments: A Scoping Review Alison PearceMark HarrisonStirling Bryan Review Article Open access 03 November 2020 Pages: 17 - 53
Mobilising the Next Generation of Stated-Preference Studies: the Association of Access Device with Choice Behaviour and Data Quality Caroline M. VassMarco Boeri Original Research Article 23 December 2020 Pages: 55 - 63
Benefit–Risk or Risk–Benefit Trade-Offs? Another Look at Attribute Ordering Effects in a Pilot Choice Experiment Sebastian HeidenreichAndrea Phillips-BeyerKevin Marsh Original Research Article 11 November 2020 Pages: 65 - 74
Development of a Conceptual Model of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia to Better Understand the Patient Experience Daniel EekMatthew BlowfieldToby A. Eyre Original Research Article Open access 18 August 2020 Pages: 75 - 87
Comparing the Preferences of Patients and the General Public for Treatment Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Norah L. CrossnohereSarah JanseJohn F. P. Bridges Original Research Article 04 September 2020 Pages: 89 - 100
Testing and Psychometric Validation of a Pediatric Instrument to Self-Assess Symptoms of the Common Cold Rob ArbucklePatricia HalsteadCathy Gelotte Original Research Article Open access 11 November 2020 Pages: 101 - 117
Use of Patient Preferences in Health Technology Assessment: Perspectives of Canadian, Belgian and German HTA Representatives Eline van OverbeekeValérie ForresterIsabelle Huys Original Research Article Open access 28 August 2020 Pages: 119 - 128
Utility Values for the CP-6D, a Cerebral Palsy-Specific Multi-Attribute Utility Instrument, Using a Discrete Choice Experiment Mina BahrampourRichard NormanPaul A. Scuffham Original Research Article 19 October 2020 Pages: 129 - 138
Letter to the Editor in response to Greidanus et al., June 2020, “The Successful Return-To-Work Questionnaire for Cancer Survivors (I-RTW_CS): Development, Validity and Reproducibility” Masamitsu KobayashiJun KakoAyako Ogata Letter to the Editor 19 October 2020 Pages: 139 - 140
Response to Comment on “The Successful Return-To-Work Questionnaire for Cancer Survivors (I-RTW_CS): Development, Validity and Reproducibility” Michiel A. GreidanusAngela G. E. M. de BoerSietske J. Tamminga Letter to the Editor 19 October 2020 Pages: 141 - 143
Comment on “Feasibility of Measuring Preferences for Chemotherapy Among Early-Stage Breast Cancer Survivors Using a Direct Rank Ordering Multicriteria Decision Analysis Versus a Time Trade-Off” Edouard Kujawski Letter to the Editor 10 November 2020 Pages: 145 - 146
Patient Feedback on Research Studies: How to Interpret Feedback from the ‘Aware’ Patient? Kelly T. GleasonHae-Ra Han Letter to the Editor 13 October 2020 Pages: 147 - 148
Correction to: Comparing the Preferences of Patients and the General Public for Treatment Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Norah L. CrossnohereSarah JanseJohn F. P. Bridges Correction 04 November 2020 Pages: 149 - 149