1. Misconduct in science: Controversy and progress

   • Stephanie J. Bird
   • Alicia K. Dustira

   Editorial Pages: 131 - 136

2. Changing explanatory frameworks in the U.S. government’s attempt to define research misconduct

   • David H. Guston

   OriginalPaper Pages: 137 - 154

3. Commentary on “changing explanatory frameworks in the U.S. government’s attempt to define research misconduct” (D. Guston)

   • Allan C. Shipp

   ReviewPaper Pages: 155 - 157

4. Commentary on “changing explanatory frameworks in the U.S. government’s attempts to define research misconduct” (D.H. Guston)

   • Margaret Dale

   ReviewPaper Pages: 158 - 160

5. Confronting misconduct in science in the 1980s and 1990s: What has and has not been accomplished?

   • Nicholas H. Steneck

   OriginalPaper Pages: 161 - 176

6. Commentary on "confronting misconduct in the 1980s and 1990s: What has and has not been accomplished?"

   • Paul J. Friedman

   ReviewPaper Pages: 177 - 178

7. Integrity in science: Moving into the new millennium

   • Rosemary Chalk

   ReviewPaper Pages: 179 - 182

8. The history and future of the office of research integrity: Scientific misconduct and beyond

   • Chris B. Pascal

   OriginalPaper Pages: 183 - 198

9. Scientific misconduct: The lessons of time

   • Daryl E. Chubin

   ReviewPaper Pages: 199 - 202

10. Commentary on “The history and future of the office of research integrity: Scientific misconduct and beyond” (C. Pascal)

    • Kenneth D. Pimple

    ReviewPaper Pages: 203 - 204

11. Ambiguity, trust, and the responsible conduct of research

    • Frederick Grinnell

    OriginalPaper Pages: 205 - 214

12. The scientific endeavor is based on vigilance, not trust

    • Jonathan King

    ReviewPaper Pages: 215 - 217

13. Promoting responsible conduct: Striving for change rather than consensus

    • Michael J. Zigmond

    ReviewPaper Pages: 219 - 228

14. The fallout: What happens to whistleblowers and those accused but exonerated of scientific misconduct?

    • James S. Lubalin
    • Jennifer L. Matheson

    OriginalPaper Pages: 229 - 250

15. Commentary on “the fallout: What happens to whistleblowers and those accused but exonerated of scientific misconduct?” (J.S. Lubalin and J.L. Matheson)

    • Judith P. Swazey

    ReviewPaper Pages: 251 - 253

16. Why fallout from whistleblowing is hard to avoid

    • Joan E. Sieber

    ReviewPaper Pages: 255 - 260

17. Developing a federal policy on research misconduct

    • Sybil Francis

    OriginalPaper Pages: 261 - 272

18. Commentary on ‘Developing a federal policy on research misconduct’ (S. Francis)

    • Kenneth J. Ryan

    ReviewPaper Pages: 273 - 274

19. Serious deviation from accepted practices

    • Donald Buzzelli

    OriginalPaper Pages: 275 - 282

20. Scientific misconduct: Present problems and future trends

    • Barbara Mishkin

    OriginalPaper Pages: 283 - 292

21. Development of international guidelines for research ethics

    • Matthias Kaiser

    ReviewPaper Pages: 293 - 298

22. Commentary on "scientific misconduct: Present problems and future trends" (B. Mishkin)

    • Debra M. Parrish

    ReviewPaper Pages: 299 - 301