Misconduct in science: Controversy and progress Stephanie J. BirdAlicia K. Dustira Editorial Pages: 131 - 136
Changing explanatory frameworks in the U.S. government’s attempt to define research misconduct David H. Guston OriginalPaper Pages: 137 - 154
Commentary on “changing explanatory frameworks in the U.S. government’s attempt to define research misconduct” (D. Guston) Allan C. Shipp ReviewPaper Pages: 155 - 157
Commentary on “changing explanatory frameworks in the U.S. government’s attempts to define research misconduct” (D.H. Guston) Margaret Dale ReviewPaper Pages: 158 - 160
Confronting misconduct in science in the 1980s and 1990s: What has and has not been accomplished? Nicholas H. Steneck OriginalPaper Pages: 161 - 176
Commentary on "confronting misconduct in the 1980s and 1990s: What has and has not been accomplished?" Paul J. Friedman ReviewPaper Pages: 177 - 178
The history and future of the office of research integrity: Scientific misconduct and beyond Chris B. Pascal OriginalPaper Pages: 183 - 198
Commentary on “The history and future of the office of research integrity: Scientific misconduct and beyond” (C. Pascal) Kenneth D. Pimple ReviewPaper Pages: 203 - 204
Ambiguity, trust, and the responsible conduct of research Frederick Grinnell OriginalPaper Pages: 205 - 214
Promoting responsible conduct: Striving for change rather than consensus Michael J. Zigmond ReviewPaper Pages: 219 - 228
The fallout: What happens to whistleblowers and those accused but exonerated of scientific misconduct? James S. LubalinJennifer L. Matheson OriginalPaper Pages: 229 - 250
Commentary on “the fallout: What happens to whistleblowers and those accused but exonerated of scientific misconduct?” (J.S. Lubalin and J.L. Matheson) Judith P. Swazey ReviewPaper Pages: 251 - 253
Commentary on ‘Developing a federal policy on research misconduct’ (S. Francis) Kenneth J. Ryan ReviewPaper Pages: 273 - 274
Scientific misconduct: Present problems and future trends Barbara Mishkin OriginalPaper Pages: 283 - 292
Development of international guidelines for research ethics Matthias Kaiser ReviewPaper Pages: 293 - 298
Commentary on "scientific misconduct: Present problems and future trends" (B. Mishkin) Debra M. Parrish ReviewPaper Pages: 299 - 301
