1. Introduction to the special issue on the evaluation of anti-crime programs

   • Carol Petrie
   • David Weisburd

   OriginalPaper 03 October 2006 Pages: 265 - 270

2. Improving evaluation of anti-crime programs: Summary of a National Research Council report^★

   • Mark Lipsey
   • Carol Petrie
   • Denise Gottfredson

   OriginalPaper 19 October 2006 Pages: 271 - 307

3. Connecting the dots: Crime rates and criminal justice evaluation research

   • Richard Rosenfeld

   OriginalPaper 14 September 2006 Pages: 309 - 319

4. The need for evaluation research

   • James Q. Wilson

   OriginalPaper 07 September 2006 Pages: 321 - 328

5. Methodological quality and the evaluation of anti-crime programs

   • David P. Farrington

   OriginalPaper 07 September 2006 Pages: 329 - 337

6. Towards systematic knowledge building: An anti-crime research and development continuum

   • Adele V. Harrell

   OriginalPaper 14 September 2006 Pages: 339 - 344

7. When is a bologna sandwich better than sex? A defense of small-n case study evaluations

   • John E. Eck

   OriginalPaper 22 September 2006 Pages: 345 - 362

8. Assessing problematic research: How can academic researchers help improve the quality of anti-crime program evaluations?

   • Janet L. Lauritsen

   OriginalPaper 14 September 2006 Pages: 363 - 373

9. Improving impact evaluations through randomised experiments: The challenge of the National Research Council report for European criminology

   • Martin Killias

   OriginalPaper 07 September 2006 Pages: 375 - 391

10. “To develop and test:” The inventive difference between evaluation and experimentation

    • Lawrence W. Sherman

    OriginalPaper 22 September 2006 Pages: 393 - 406

11. Effects of face-to-face restorative justice on victims of crime in four randomized, controlled trials

    • Lawrence W. Sherman
    • Heather Strang
    • Meredith Rossner

    Erratum 14 September 2006 Pages: 407 - 407