Background

Kidney, the principal organ of homeostasis, performs both excretory and regulatory functions [1, 2]. Renal dysfunction results in bioaccumulation of metabolic wastes which could be terminal (resulting in death), if left unchecked [3]. While some forms of kidney disorder are idiopathic, others have been associated with known causes namely genetic, lifestyle or chemically-induced (toxicological) [4,5,6]. Heavy metal toxicity, of which lead (Pb) toxicity is important, plays a significant role in the pathogenesis of kidney disorder in many population [5, 7, 8].

Lead (Pb), occurring in both organic and inorganic forms in the environment, is a toxic heavy metal of environmental and occupational concern [9, 10]. Due to its unique inherent qualities namely low melting point, resistant to corrosion, malleability, ductility and softness, Pb has found its relevance in several industrial processes such as in the production of paints, automobiles, water pipes, ceramics as well as electric storage batteries [9, 11]. Nevertheless, it is a non-biodegradable toxicant which when absorbed into the body (either by inhalation or ingestion) has an estimated biological half-life of about 10 years, thus enhancing bioaccumulation [10, 12]. Acting through disturbance of the antioxidant system, Pb-induced oxidative stress is known to occur via any of the following two pathways in order to cause toxic effects; generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and depletion of antioxidant reserves through the generation of ROS [13, 14]. According to literature, Pb toxicity is associated with deleterious biological effects including hemopoietic [15], nervous [12], reproductive [9], cardiovascular [16], gastrointestinal [10], hepatic [17] and kidney [18, 19] dysfunctions. Since the basic mechanism of Pb-induced toxicity is disruption of the antioxidant system, therapeutic interventions are usually geared towards application of chelating agents namely dimercaprol (BAL), Calcium Disodium EDTA (CaNa2EDTA) and succimer (2, 3–meso-dimercaptosuccinic acid or DMSA). These chelating agents are expensive, not readily available and sometimes burdened with undesirable side effects [9, 20]. This study aimed at exploring the therapeutic potential of a local (easily accessible) medicinal plant in an experimental model of Pb-induced kidney injury.

It was reported by WHO that, in health care aids, medicinal plants are used among 80% of the world’s population either as the plant extract or in the form of their active components due to their health beneficial effects [21]. Besides forming the basis for almost all medicinal therapy, herbs are contained in about 40% of prescriptions and interest for herbal remedies instead of synthetic drugs is on the increase due to their associated relatively lesser side effects [22, 23].

Garlic (Allium sativum) is a common and readily accessible plant that is cultivated both sexually and asexually [24]. It is a nutritional plant that is used as spice in food and has vast medicinal properties [8, 9]. Some of its pharmacological activities namely anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-biotic and anti-thrombotic effects have been experimentally demonstrated in conditions such as prostate cancer, cardiovascular disease, stroke, reproductive toxicity and kidney injury [8, 9, 25]. However, there is dearth of literature on the effects of garlic extract on the mechanisms of renal clearance and proteinuria in models of Pb-induced kidney injury. This study aims to bridge this gap in knowledge.

Materials and methods

Metabolic cages

Metabolic cages were fabricated by Central Technological Laboratory and Workshops (CTLW), Obafemi Awolowo University (OAU), Ile-Ife, Osun state, Nigeria [3, 26].

Plant material, lead salt, biochemical kits and chemicals

Fresh garlic bulbs where purchased from a commercial supplier at Lagere market, Ile-Ife, Osun State, Nigeria and certified by a Botanist at the Department of Botany, Obafemi Awolowo University (OAU) where a voucher specimen was deposited.

Lead, in the form of lead acetate salt, was procured from Guangzhou Fischer Chemical Co., Ltd. (Guangdong, China).

Assay kits for renal function tests were purchased from Randox Laboratories Ltd. (United Kindgdom) while 1, 1-Diphenyl-2-picryl-hydrazy (DPPH) was procured from Sigma Chemicals Co. (USA). All other chemicals used were of analytical grade, available commercially.

Extraction process of aqueous garlic extract (AGE)

The garlic bulbs were peeled, rinsed in tap water and thereafter weighed (W1). The weighed bulbs were pulverized in distilled water with the aid of a Waring blender (Waring Commercial, Torrington, CT). With the aid of an electric shaker, the resulting mixture was subjected to constant shaking for 12 h and thereafter filtered using < 2 μm pore sieve. The filtrate, without been concentrated with a rotary evaporator, was directly fixed-dried in a lyophilizer at − 40 °C (Ilshin Lab. Co. Ltd., Seoul, Republic of Korea). The yield obtained (aqueous garlic extract) was weighed (W2) and thereafter kept in a desiccator until when needed. The percentage yield of aqueous garlic extract (AGE) was calculated using the formula below; [3, 27, 28].

$$ \mathrm{Percentage}\ \mathrm{yield}\ \mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{AGE}\ \left(\%\right)=\frac{\mathrm{Yield}\ \mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{extract}\ \mathrm{in}\ \mathrm{gram}\ \left(\mathrm{W}2\right)}{\mathrm{Weight}\ \mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{freshly}\ \mathrm{peeled}\ \mathrm{bulbs}\ \mathrm{in}\ \mathrm{gram}\ \left(\mathrm{W}1\right)}\times 100\% $$

Note: The extraction process of aqueous garlic extract (AGE) was carried out without the application of heat.

Phytochemical screening of AGE

Phytochemical screening of the extract was carried out in accordance with established standard laboratory protocols, described as follows;

The presence of alkaloids were qualitatively determined by the method of Halilu and co-workers [29] and quantified according to the method of Harbone [30]. Flavonoids were qualitatively determined by the method of Halilu and co-workers [29] and quantified by the method of Obadoni and Ochuko [31]. The presence of tannins was determined by the method of Halilu and co-workers [29] and thereafter quantified by the method of Allen and co-workers [32]. The presence of saponins was determined using Froth test as described by Benmehdi and co-workers [33] and thereafter quantified by the method of Obadoni and Ochuko [31]. The presence of phenolics was determined and quantified by the method of Edeoga and co-workers [34]. The presence of terpenoids was qualitatively determined by the method of Benmehdi and co-workers [33]. Qualitative analysis of cardiac glycoside was by Keller-Kiliani test as described by Anjali and Sheetal [35] while the quantitative analysis was by the method of Harbone [30].

Determination of total flavonoid and total phenolic contents of AGE

Total phenolic content of AGE was determined by the method of Singleton and Rossi [36] and as described by Gulcin and co-workers [37] using Folin–Ciocalteu’s phenol reagent which is an oxidizing reagent. 0.2 ml of Folin–Ciocalteu’s phenol reagent was added to a mixture of 0.1 ml of the sample and 0.9 ml of distilled water. The resulting mixture was voltexed. After 5 min of standing, 1.00 ml of 7% (w/w) Na2CO3 solution was added and thereafter made up to 2.5 ml with distilled water before the resulting mixture was incubated for 90 min at room temperature. Using an ultraviolet (UV)-Vis spectrophotometer (Labtronics, India; Model LT-290), the absorbance was read at a wavelength of 750 nm against a negative control which contained 1 ml of distilled water. The gallic acid equivalent (GAE) of AGE was determined using gallic acid at 0.1 mg/ml as a standard, after preparing a calibration curve.

Total flavonoid content of AGE was determined using aluminum chloride colorimetric assay method according to Zhilen and co-workers [38] and as described by Miliauskas and co-workers [39]. Standard quercetin with varying concentrations 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 and 0.5 mg/ml was used as standard in comparison to the AGE sample. 0.4 ml of DW was added to 0.1 ml of AGE/the standard, followed by 0.1 ml of 5% sodium nitrate solution. After 5 min, 0.1 ml of 10% aluminum chloride, and 0.2 ml of sodium hydroxide solutions were added to the resulting mixture after which the volume was made up to 2.5 ml with distilled water. The absorbance, at a wavelength of 510 nm, was read against blank using a UV–vis spectrophotometer (Labtronics, India; Model LT-290).

The aforementioned tests were performed in triplicate, and the final results were expressed as mean ± Standard Error of Mean in mg quercetin/GAE per gram of AGE using the formula below; [37, 39].

$$ \mathrm{X}=\mathrm{q}\ \left(\mathrm{V}/\mathrm{w}\right) $$

X = total content of flavonoid or phenolic compound in quercetin or GAE respectively;

q = concentration of quercetin or gallic acid established from the standard curve;

V = volume of AGE (ml); and.

w = weight of AGE sample.

Radical scavenging activity of AGE

The extract was evaluated for radical scavenging activity using Table 1, 1-diphenyl-2-picryl-hydrazy (DPPH) according to the method of Blois [40]. Butylated hydroxyl anisole (BHA) solutions as well as varied concentrations of the extract (2.5, 5, 10, and 20 g/ml) were taken into different test tubes. Four millilitres (4 ml) of 0.1 mM of DPPH was added to the test tubes, voltexed and allowed to stand at 27 °C for 20 min. Absorbance of the samples was measured at 517 nm against the absorbance of the control and their radical scavenging activities were calculated as follows; [40].

Table 1 Experimental protocol and dose regimen
$$ \mathrm{Radical}\ \mathrm{scavenging}\ \mathrm{activity}\ \left(\%\right)=\frac{1\hbox{-} \mathrm{Asample}}{\mathrm{Acontrol}}\times 100 $$

Determination of acute oral lethal dose (LD50) of AGE

Acute oral lethal dose (LD50) of AGE was determined by the method of Lorke [41] as modified by Imafidon and co-workers [27]. The modification of Lorke’s procedure was the use of 2 rats per group in the second phase of the study; Lorke proposed the use of 1 rat per group at the second phase of LD50 determination.

A total of 17 adult Wistar rats were used for the determination of LD50. In the first phase of the experiment, 9 rats were divided into 3 groups of 3 rats each and thereafter received graded doses of AGE at 10 mg/kg, 100 mg/kg and 1000 mg/kg orally. The rats were observed for 24 h after which the first phase of the study was terminated.

In the second phase, 8 rats were divided into 4 groups of 2 rats each after which they received graded doses of AGE at 750 mg/kg, 1500 mg/kg, 3000 mg/kg and 6000 mg/kg orally. They were also observed for 24 h after which the second phase of the study was terminated. Thereafter, the oral LD50 of AGE was determined using the formula below;

$$ {\mathrm{LD}}_{50}=\surd \mathrm{a}\ x\ \mathrm{b} $$

Where a = least dose that killed a rat;

b = highest dose that did not kill a rat.

Preparation of stock solution of Pb and AGE

Lead (Pb), in the form of lead acetate [Pb (CH3COO)2], was used for the study. It was ensured that each 100 g rat received 0.2 ml of any of the solutions in order to avoid fluid overload.

The stock solution of Pb was prepared by dissolving 35 mg of lead acetate in 20 ml of normal saline so that each 100 g rat received intraperitoneal injection of 0.2 ml of Pb from the stock solution (35 mg/kg of Pb) for 10 consecutive days.

The stock solution for 100 mg/kg of AGE was prepared by dissolving 1 g of AGE in 20 ml of normal saline. The stock solutions for 200 mg/kg and 400 mg/kg of AGE were prepared by dissolving 2 g and 4 g of AGE each in 20 ml of normal saline respectively. The stock solutions for AGE were refrigerated after use while fresh samples were prepared every 48 h throughout the period of study.

Animal management and experimental protocol

The experimental protocols were in strict compliance with the guidelines for animal research, as detailed in NIH Guidelines for the Care and use of Laboratory Animals [42] and approved by local Institutional Research Committee.

Thirty male Wistar rats (aged 8–9 weeks old) weighing 120 – 150 g were used for this study. They were purchased from the Animal Holdings Unit of the College of Health Sciences, OAU, Ile-Ife where the study was carried out. Each rat was housed in a separate metabolic cage and was allowed access to standard rat chow (ACE Feeds Plc, Osogbo, Nigeria) and water ad libitum. The rats were allowed to acclimatize to life in the metabolic cages for two weeks before the study commenced. The rats were thereafter divided into six groups of five rats each as follows; Group 1 received normal saline (2 ml/kg) throughout the study period, after which they were sacrificed under ketamine anesthesia (65 mg/kg i.m). Group 2 received 35 mg/kg of Pb (i.p) for 10 consecutive days after which they were euthanized under ketamine anesthesia. Group 3 were pretreated as group 2 and thereafter left for a recovery period of 30 days (without treatment) before they were also euthanized. Groups 4, 5 and 6 were pretreated as group 2 and thereafter received graded doses of AGE at 100, 200 and 400 mg/kg respectively for 30 days before they were also euthanized (Table 1). Before the rats were euthanized, their 24 h urine samples were collected inside the metabolic cages. Blood sample from each rat was collected by cardiac puncture (under ketamine anesthesia) into separate lithium heparinized bottles and centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 15 min using a cold centrifuge (Centrium Scientific, model 8881) at − 4 °C. The plasma obtained was decanted into separate plain bottles using separate sterile syringes. The left kidney of each rat was excised and kept in a cooler for the preparation of homogenates while their right kidneys were fixed in 10% formal-saline solution for histological examination.

Biochemical assays

Assessment of kidney function biomarkers, total protein concentration and plasma nitric oxide level

The biomarkers of kidney function namely creatinine and urea were assayed using Randox standard laboratory kits (Randox, UK) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. However, creatinine clearance was calculated using the formula below;

$$ \mathrm{Creatinine}\ \mathrm{clearance}\ \left(\mathrm{ml}/\min \right)=\frac{{\mathrm{U}}_{\mathbf{c}}\mathrm{V}}{{\mathrm{P}}_{\mathbf{c}}} $$

Where Uc = urine creatinine concentration;

V = urine flow rate = volume of urine/time; and.

Pc = plasma creatinine concentration.

The concentration of total protein was determined by the method of Lowry and co-workers [43] while nitric oxide level was determined by the method of Grisham and co-workers [44].

Note: For the conversion of S.I. units from dl/ml to mg/ml in the determination of urine total protein-creatinine ratio, the following system of conversion was used; [26].

$$ 1\ \mathrm{dl}=100\ \mathrm{g} $$

Determination of fractional excretion of urea (FEurea)

Fractional excretion of urea (FEurea) was determined using the formula below; [45].

$$ \mathrm{FEurea}\ \left(\%\right)=\frac{{\mathrm{U}}_{\mathrm{urea}}\times {\mathrm{P}}_{\mathrm{Cr}}}{{\mathrm{P}}_{\mathrm{urea}}\times {\mathrm{U}}_{\mathrm{Cr}}}\times 100 $$

Where Uurea = urea concentration in the urine; Purea = urea concentration in the plasma; UCr = creatinine concentration in the urine; and PCr = creatinine concentration in the plasma.

Assessment of oxidative stress status and lipid peroxidation

With the aid of an electric homogenizer (SI601001), 10% homogenate in phosphate buffer (100 mM) was prepared with the left kidney tissue at a pH of 7.4. Thereafter, the homogenate was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 20 min and the supernatant was collected for the assessment of the following indices of oxidative stress;

Reduced glutathione (GSH) level was determined by the method of Beutler and co-workers [46], the activity of superoxide dismutase was determined by the method of McCord and Fridovich [47], catalase (CAT) activity was by the method of Sinha [48] while the level of thiobartiburic acid reactive substances (TBARS) was determined according to the method of Ohkawa and co-workers [49].

Histological examination

The right kidney of each rat was fixed in 10% formal-saline solution. Each kidney was thereafter dehydrated in graded alcohol and embedded in paraffin wax. Sections of about 7–8 μm thick were subjected to Haematoxylin and Eosin (H & E) staining technique for photomicrographic assessment using Leica DM 750 camera microscope at × 400 magnification.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance and expressed as mean ± Standard Error of Mean. Thereafter, they were subjected to Newman Keul’s post-hoc test and the level of significance was set at p < 0.05. Differences between two variables was assessed using student’s t-test. The statistical analysis was carried out using graph pad prism 5.03 (Graph Pad Software Inc., CA, USA).

Results

Percentage yield and phytochemical screening of AGE

The percentage yield of AGE was determined to be 69.47 ± 0.51% (n = 3) (Table 2) while phytochemical screening detected the presence of flavonoids, phenolics, cardiac glycosides, alkaloids, tannins and saponin in the extract (Table 3).

Table 2 Percentage yield of AGE
Table 3 Qualitative and quantitative determination of phytochemicals in AGE

Total flavonoid content, total phenolic content, radical scavenging activity and oral lethal dose of AGE

The extract was observed to have high amount of total flavonoid and phenolic contents in gram per milligram of their respective standards (Table 4) while the radical scavenging capacity was observed to increase with increasing doses (Fig. 1). Oral lethal dose (LD50) of AGE was determined to be greater than 6000 mg/kg (Table 5).

Table 4 Total Phenolic and total flavonoid content of AGE
Fig. 1
figure 1

Radical scavenging activity of aqueous garlic extract (AGE) at different concentrations. Graph showing concentration-dependent radical scavenging activity of AGE (p < 0.0001; F = 650.85). Each value represents mean ± Standard Error of Mean (n = 3); RSA = radical scavenging activity; AGE = aqueous garlic extract; BHA = butylated hydroxyl anisole

Table 5 Acute oral toxicity test (LD50) of AGE

Effects of AGE on plasma and urine concentrations of creatinine, urea and total protein of Wistar rats with Pb-induced kidney injury

Pb administration was associated with a significant increase in the plasma creatinine concentration (mg/dl) of group 2 when compared with group 1 (p < 0.05). That of the AGE-treated groups 4, 5 and 6 were significantly lower when compared with groups 2 and 3, with no significant difference shown when compared with group 1. The urine creatinine levels of groups 2 and 3 were significantly lower than that of group 1. Groups 4, 5 and 6 showed a significantly higher level of urine creatinine when compared with group 1 (p < 0.05) (Table 6).

Table 6 Effects of AGE on plasma and urine concentrations of creatinine, urea and total protein in Wistar rats with Pb-induced kidney injury

There was a significant increase in plasma urea level (mg/dl) of groups 2 and 3 when compared with group 1 (p < 0.05). However, that of groups 4, 5 and 6 were not significantly different from group 1 (p > 0.05). On the other hand, the urine urea concentration of groups 2 and 3 were significantly lower than that of group 1 while no significant difference was recorded in that of AGE-treated groups 5 and 6 when compared with group 1 (Table 6).

The plasma total protein concentration [× 10− 2 (mg/ml)] was significantly lowered in groups 2 and 3 when compared with group 1 (p < 0.05). That of groups 4, 5 and 6 were significantly higher than groups 2 and 3 but showed no significant difference when compared with group 1. On the other hand, the urine total protein concentration of groups 2 and 3 was significantly higher than that of group 1 (p < 0.05). However, the AGE-treated groups 5 and 6 showed no significant difference in urine total protein level when compared with group 1 (Table 6).

Effects of AGE plasma and kidney nitric oxide (NO) concentration, creatinine clearance and fractional excretion of urea (FEurea) of Wistar rats with Pb-induced kidney injury

The plasma NO level (μM) was significantly lowered in groups 2 and 3 (0.39 ± 0.03 and 0.42 ± 0.03 respectively) when compared with group 1 (1.14 ± 0.04) (p < 0.05). The AGE-treated groups 4, 5 and 6 (0.94 ± 0.03; 1.12 ± 0.03 and 1.25 ± 0.02 respectively) showed significantly higher plasma NO level when compared with group 2 (0.39 ± 0.03) (p < 0.05) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Effects of AGE on plasma and kidney nitric oxide concentrations, creatinine clearance and fractional excretion of urea of Wistar rats with Pb-induced kidney injury. Each bar represents mean ± Standard Error of Mean (S.E.M.) at p < 0.05. a = significantly different from control group [1], b = significantly different from Pb group [2], c = significantly different from Pb + recovery group [3], d = significantly different from Pb + 100 mg/kg group [4], and e = significantly different from Pb + 200 mg/kg group [5]

The kidney NO level (μM) was significantly lowered in groups 2 and 3 (0.20 ± 0.01 and 0.24 ± 0.01 respectively) when compared with group 1 (0.80 ± 0.03) (p < 0.05). The AGE-treated groups 5 and 6 (0.76 ± 0.02 and 0.75 ± 0.02 respectively) were significantly higher than groups 2 and 3 (0.20 ± 0.01 and 0.24 ± 0.01 respectively) but showed no significant difference when compared with group 1 (0.80 ± 0.03) (p < 0.05) (Fig. 2).

Groups 2 and 3 (1.09 ± 0.05 and 1.13 ± 0.06 respectively) showed a significantly lowered creatinine clearance [× 10− 2 (ml/min)] when compared with group 1 (3.38 ± 0.22) (p < 0.05). However, the AGE-treated groups 5 and 6 (3.37 ± 0.12 and 3.55 ± 0.13 respectively) showed no significant difference in creatinine clearance when compared with group 1 (3.38 ± 0.22) (p > 0.05) but were significantly higher than groups 2 and 3 (1.09 ± 0.05 and 1.13 ± 0.06 respectively) (Fig. 2).

The fractional excretion of urea (%) was significantly lowered in groups 2 and 3 (19.62 ± 2.13 and 27.20 ± 1.80 respectively) when compared with group 1 (54.29 ± 1.00) (p < 0.05). Groups 5 and 6 (58.18 ± 1.91 and 59.57 ± 1.39 respectively), however, showed a significantly higher fractional excretion of urea when compared with group 1 (54.29 ± 1.00) (p < 0.05) (Fig. 2).

Effects of AGE on indicators of oxidative stress (GSH, SOD, CAT) and lipid peroxidation (TBARS) of Wistar rats with Pb-induced kidney injury

Kidney GSH level (μg/mg protein) was significantly lowered in groups 2 and 3 when compared with group 1 as well as the AGE-treated groups 4, 5 and 6 (p < 0.05). However, the AGE-treated groups 5 and 6 showed no significant difference in the GSH level when compared with group 1 (Table 7).

Table 7 Effects of AGE on kidney indicators of oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation in Wistar rats with Pb-induced kidney injury

Although the AGE-treated groups 4 and 5 showed a significantly lowered kidney SOD level (mM/mg protein) when compared with group 1 (p < 0.05), all AGE-treated groups 4, 5 and 6 showed a significantly higher SOD level when compared with groups 2 and 3 (p < 0.05). SOD level of groups 2 and 3 was significantly lower than group 1 (p < 0.05) (Table 7).

Groups 2 and 3 had a significantly lower kidney CAT level (μmol/min/mg protein) when compared with group 1 as well as the AGE-treated groups 4, 5 and 6 (p < 0.05). However, the AGE-treated groups 5 and 6 showed no significant difference in CAT level when compared with group 1 (p > 0.05) (Table 7).

Kidney TBARS level (nmol/mg protein) was significantly higher in groups 2 and 3 when compared with group 1 as well as the AGE-treated groups 4, 5 and 6 (p < 0.05). However, the AGE-treated groups 5 and 6 showed no significant difference in TBARS level when compared with group 1 (p > 0.05) (Table 7).

Effects of AGE on urine total protein-creatinine ratio of Wistar rats with Pb-induced kidney injury

Groups 2 and 3 (3.16 ± 0.07 and 3.18 ± 0.11 respectively) showed a significantly higher urine total protein-creatinine ratio (mg/g) when compared with group 1 (2.82 ± 0.04) and the AGE-treated groups 4, 5 and 6 (2.75 ± 0.16; 2.55 ± 0.04 and 2.33 ± 0.06 respectively) (p < 0.05). However, that of groups 4 and 5 (2.75 ± 0.16 and 2.55 ± 0.04 respectively) showed no significant difference when compared with group 1 (2.82 ± 0.04) (p > 0.05) while the AGE-treated group 6 (2.33 ± 0.06) had a significantly lower urine total protein-creatinine ratio when compared with group 1 (2.82 ± 0.04) (p < 0.05) (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Effects of AGE on urine total protein – creatinine ratio of Wistar rats with Pb-induced kidney injury. Each bar represents mean ± Standard Error of Mean (S.E.M.) at p < 0.05. a = significantly different from control group [1], b = significantly different from Pb group [2], c = significantly different from Pb + recovery group [3], and d = significantly different from Pb + 100 mg/kg group [4]

Histological effects of AGE on the kidney of Wistar rats with Pb-induced kidney injury

Pb administration was associated with histoarchitectural distortion that was characterized by atrophied and shrunken glomerulus as well as tubular and interstitial vacuolation in groups 2. Also, the recovery group 3 showed evidence of sustained kidney histoarchitectural distortion with apparent vacuolation of renal tubules and medullary interstitium. Although representative micrograph of the AGE-treated group 4 showed evidence of atrophied glomerulus with mild tubular vacuolation, those of groups 5 and 6 had similar features with the micrographic evidence of group 1 which was characterized by an apparently normal glomerulus, renal tubules (proximal and distal) and apparently intact interstitium (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Histological effects of AGE on the kidney of Wistar rats with Pb-induced kidney injury. Magnification = × 400; [1] to [6] = groups 1 to 6; AGE = aqueous garlic extract; Pb = Lead; G = glomerulus; P = proximal tubule; D = distal tubule; Black arrow = atrophied glomerulus; Red arrow = tubular and interstitial vacuolation

Discussion

The study demonstrated the therapeutic effects of aqueous garlic extract (AGE) on the renal function of Wistar rats with Pb-induced kidney injury. Worthy of note is the fact that preparation of the crude extract was without application of heat (direct lyophilizing of filtrate) in order to preserve any possible heat-labile constituent in the extract.

Abnormal levels of plasma and urine biomarkers of renal function that were associated with Pb administration, as shown in this study, are clear indications that this heavy metal (Pb) induces both glomerular and tubular defects. This fact was well corroborated by the representative micrographic evidence which showed glomerular defects with tubular and interstitial vacuolation. Deleterious effects on the kidney’s filtering ability are usually associated with a significant increase in plasma levels of renal function biomarkers, hence the determination of renal clearance is essential for the assessment of glomerular filtration rate [50, 51]. This study showed that renal clearance was significantly reduced following Pb administration, with a consequent increase in the plasma level of creatinine and urea as well as significantly lowered urinary excretion of these renal function biomarkers. This study, therefore, suggests that AGE has the potential to ameliorate Pb-induced kidney injury via modulation of glomerular and renal tubular activities in order to bring about normalization of renal clearance. These effects were, however, enhanced by AGE-induced increase in renal perfusion via increased secretion of vasodilatory chemokine(s) (NO); facts that were demonstrated in this study by the increased levels of NO and fractional excretion of urea (FEurea). While increased vasodilatory effect of AGE was characterized by increased plasma and kidney NO level, the AGE-induced increase in renal perfusion was corroborated by a significant increase in FEurea following Pb administration. According to literature, NO is a potent vasodilator that has been reported to be essential for normal kidney function due to its vital role in renal mechanisms including renin release, extracellular fluid regulation, tubulo-glomerular feedback as well as regulation of glomerular and medullary hemodynamics [52, 53] while reduced FEurea level is a reflection of pre-renal effects as a result of reduced renal perfusion [54, 55].

Furthermore, the Pb-induced reduction in renal perfusion was associated with derangements of the antioxidant system as demonstrated by kidney activities of GSH, SOD, CAT as well as deleterious TBARS level (an index of lipid peroxidation). This suggests a possible renal ischemia reperfusion injury. Basically, ischemia reperfusion injury refers to cell injury or damage that results from the return of blood supply after a period of inadequate blood supply to any part of the body (ischemia) [56]. Chen and co-workers [57] reported that reperfusion injury induces reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation as a result of injury or damage to mitochondrial complexes. Since the kidney has capacity to auto regulate itself; maintaining a fairly constant blood supply despite fluctuations in arterial supply [1], it can be inferred that the observed significantly lowered circulating NO level must have coincided with compromised auto regulation capacity by the kidney of the Pb-treated group for renal ischemia reperfusion injury to have occurred. The findings of this study suggests that Pb administration elicits deleterious effects on the renal antioxidant system through renal ischemia reperfusion injury. This mechanism apparently produced a secondary deleterious effect on renal clearance, as representative micrographic evidence showed Pb-induced kidney histoarchitectural distortions that were characterized by atrophied glomerulus as well as tubular and interstitial vacuolation. It has been reported that the basic mechanism of Pb-induced deleterious biological effects is disruption of the antioxidant system via ROS generation [9]. The significantly lowered endogenous antioxidants following Pb administration can be attributed to the increased usage of these antioxidants by the kidney to scavenge free radicals (ROS) and or reduced capacity of the renal system to replenish the used-up antioxidants in a corresponding rate at which they are being utilized. As predetermined in this study, AGE demonstrated a concentration-dependent free radical scavenging capacity (Fig. 1); making it an extract with potent antioxidant capacity with increasing doses. The administration of AGE was found to be associated with normalization of renal clearance via improved antioxidant system and significantly lowered kidney lipid peroxidation. Apparently, this presents the extract as a potential therapeutic choice in the adjuvant treatment or management of patients with renal oxidative stress that is associated with renal ischemia reperfusion injury. The pharmacological activities of the extract, as demonstrated by vasodilatory and antioxidant-boosting potentials were conferred by its important phytochemicals such as flavonoids, phenolics alkaloids and tannins (Table 3). According to literature, these phytochemicals are reputed to demonstrate anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory and membrane-stabilizing properties both invivo and invitro [58,59,60].

Pb administration was associated with reduced plasma total protein concentration and a significantly higher urine total protein excretion when compared with the control. It is not unlikely that the decreased plasma total protein concentration may be a direct consequence of increased urine total protein excretion; since representative micrographic evidence showed apparently compromised glomerular filtration barrier. Nevertheless, this study demonstrated that Pb-induced kidney injury elicits decreased protein synthesis (by the liver) into the circulation and or increased urinary excretion of total protein. Although, under apparently normal condition, Wistar rats excrete protein in their urine [26, 61, 62], proteinuria was showed to be significantly higher in the toxic group following exposure to Pb toxicity when compared with the control. According to literature, minimal change nephropathy has been found to be associated with loss of negative charges that are normally present in the glomerular capillary basement membrane [63]. Basically, the physiologic relevance of the negatively charged basement membrane is to repel the negatively charged plasma proteins since like-charge repels [63]. Subject to further verification, it can be inferred that Pb toxicity enhances the rapid or increased loss of normal negative charges in the basement membrane since this loss is usually associated with the unhindered passage of plasma protein through the glomerular membrane into the urine. Besides the loss of negative charge, Imafidon and co-workers [26] reported that changes in renal histomorphometry (Bowman’s capsular space, thickness and size of the glomerulus and Bowman’s capsule as well as the endothelia fenestrae of the glomerular capillaries) reflects the capacity to express proteinuria in a relationship that is directly proportional; that is, increased size of these features is directly proportional to increased capacity to express proteinuria. Apparently, this translates to increased urine excretion of total protein due to defect(s) of the glomerular filtration barrier; apparently lager Bowman’s capsular space. The representative micrographic evidence of the AGE-treated groups showed apparently improved or normal kidney histoarchitecture when compared with both the control and toxic groups, suggesting that the extract potentially stabilizes the glomerular filtration barrier via normalization of electric charges of the basement membrane as well as histological strengthening of the filtration barrier integrity to repel plasma protein. These pharmacological effects demonstrate that the extract possesses potential stabilizing effects on the glomerular filtration barrier as its administration was associated with mitigation of the Pb-induced proteinuria; a finding that is worthy of further scientific exploration. In clinical models of kidney injury, a significantly increased urine total protein – creatinine ratio is an indication of a compromised renal function [64, 65]. Furthermore, the urine total protein – creatinine ratio trends with the level of proteinuria and allows for an effective monitoring of the progression of renal condition [65,66,67]. AGE administration significantly mitigated the Pb-induced increase in urine total protein–creatinine ratio. This portrays the extract as a potential choice in the adjuvant treatment or management of nephropathies that are associated with proteinuria. Since Pb is a toxicant with a potential to bio-accumulate [10, 12], it may be inferred that a vital mechanism for the ameliorating effect of the extract is the inhibition of Pb bioaccumulation via increased (urinary) excretion from the body. This is, however, subject to further scientific verification as this study did not include urinary Pb quantification to its scope.

Based on the findings of this study, a mechanistic view of Pb-induced kidney injury and the ameliorating effects of AGE have been summarized in Fig. 5.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Apparent mechanism of Pb-induced kidney injury and the effects of AGE on the mechanism of action. + = positive feedback mechanism; Pb = lead acetate; AGE = aqueous garlic extract; NO = nitric oxide; FEurea = fractional excretion of urea

Although this study does not indicate a clear-cut dose-dependent renal effects of aqueous garlic extract, it however demonstrates that the therapeutic effects of the extract (on Pb-induced kidney injury) increases with increasing doses. Additionally, at 400 mg/kg (the adopted highest dose for this study based on a pre-determined oral LD50 > 6000 mg/kg) the extract produced therapeutic effects on the renal function of Wistar rats. This implies that in an average human of 75 kg body weight, sub-chronic ingestion of the extract up to 30 g daily may be sufficient to produce therapeutic effects in conditions of Pb-induced kidney injury. This is, however, subject to further scientific verification and human trials.

In order to reduce the risk of sustained/irreversible kidney injury or the progression of renal dysfunction to end stage renal damage, it is recommended that Pb-exposed subjects should resort to prompt and efficacious treatment or management therapy as recovery period without any form of treatment was shown, by this study, to sustain renal dysfunction. Based on the findings of this study, the consumption of garlic (to be used as spice in food or consumed raw) should be encouraged as it promotes healthy status through its beneficial biological effects. Further verification on the effects of the extract in surgically-induced renal ischemia reperfusion injury is also recommended. Although this study provides a template for further scientific exploration of effects of AGE on the glomerular filtration barrier, novel studies that takes into account the assessment or quantification of the negative charges on the glomerular basement membrane, special staining techniques for the assessment of the filtration membranes as well as novel appraisal of the glomerular filtration barrier using electron microscopy are highly recommended in this scope of research on environmental toxicology and pharmacology.

Conclusion

It was concluded that aqueous garlic extract normalized renal clearance through vasodilatory and antioxidant mechanisms as well as caused the mitigation of proteinuria through stabilizing effects on the glomerular filtration barrier in Wistar rats with Pb-induced kidney injury.