Background

Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) binds to its receptors on neutrophil progenitors in the bone marrow and increases neutrophil number in peripheral blood by promoting the differentiation of neutrophil progenitors into neutrophils [1]. It has long been used in chemotherapies that cause myelosuppression. Pegfilgrastim is a modified version of G-CSF, with a polyethylene glycol (PEG) conjugated to the N-terminus of filgrastim to prolong its half-life in peripheral blood [1]. As a sustained form, it can be administered prophylactically during chemotherapy to prevent severe febrile neutropenia. It is widely used for a variety of malignancies.

G-CSF-related aortitis is a rare side effect of G-CSF treatment, with an incidence rate of 0.0014% in the United States and 0.47% in Japan, indicating a slightly higher incidence in Asian patients [2]. It is also known to occur more frequently in women [2, 3]. The key findings for diagnosis are the presence of aortic wall thickening and surrounding soft tissue infiltration on contrast-enhanced CT scan [2,3,4,5]. There are no specific markers for G-CSF-associated aortitis and general markers for autoimmune disease, such as PR3-ANCA (proteinase3-anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody), MPO (myeloperoxidase)-ANCA, antinuclear antibodies and IgG, are usually negative [2, 3]. Therefore, C-reactive protein (CRP) is currently used to assess disease activity in clinical practice. Treatment for this disease has not yet been established, as the benefit of steroids in patient remission, in a similar manner to Takayasu’s disease, is equivocal [2,3,4,5,6,7].

Reports of G-CSF-associated aortitis have been increasing in recent years, probably due to PEGylation [2, 3, 6]. Here, we report a case who developed pegfilgrastim-induced aortitis, localized to the right subclavian artery, during adjuvant chemotherapy. Her condition recovered without the use of steroids.

Case presentation

A 58-year-old woman found a lump on her left breast and was diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) by her previous doctor, who referred her to our department for further treatment. Fourteen years prior she had undergone curative surgery for contralateral right breast cancer at another hospital (IDC, triple negative, pT2N0M0). Postoperatively, she received six cycles of CEF (C: cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2, E: epirubicin 75 mg/m2, F: 5-fluorouracil: 500 mg/m2). She had a history of pyelonephritis. Her family history includes esophageal cancer in her father, cerebral infarction in her mother, and colon cancer in her grandfather.

At our hospital, she underwent left mastectomy and sentinel node biopsy for left breast cancer. The final pathological diagnosis was IDC, ER (−), PgR (+), HER2 (−), pT2N0M0 (stage IIA). After starting TC (docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide) as adjuvant chemotherapy, a rash appeared all over her body. A drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation test (DLST) was positive for docetaxel and palonosetron hydrochloride, so this chemotherapy was discontinued. Instead, she received dose-dense paclitaxel (ddPTX, 175 mg/m2 bi-weekly) therapy. Two days after the first course, pegfilgrastim (3.6 mg) was administered as a scheduled regimen. Eight days after the administration of pegfilgrastim, she developed high fever of 38 °C and took levofloxacin (LVFX). As the fever did not decrease within 3 days, the patient visited the emergency outpatient clinic (day 11 after pegfilgrastim administration). Figure 1 shows the clinical course of the patient. Blood tests, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), and various culture tests (blood, urine and sputum) were performed, and an increased inflammatory response was observed with white blood cell (WBC) 22,600/μL (neutrophil: 93%) and CRP 13.7 mg/dL.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Clinical course of the case patient. The clinical course of this patient after pegfilgrastim administration is shown. Blue, orange and grey lines indicate body temperature (BT), white blood cell (WBC) and CRP, respectively. Down arrowheads indicate the use of acetaminophen. ddPTX dose-dense paclitaxel, LVFX levofloxacin, ST sulfamethoxazole–trimethoprim combination, MEPM meropenem, CT computed tomography

Contrast-enhanced CT revealed wall thickening of the subclavian artery, suggesting the possibility of pegfilgrastim-induced aortitis (Fig. 2A). However, pyelonephritis could not be ruled out due to the observation of some poorly contrasted areas in the renal cortex. As a result, she was given an additional sulfamethoxazole–trimethoprim combination, however, the fever did not abate and the patient returned to the outpatient clinic on day 15. At this point CRP had increased to 21.5 mg/dL, and following strong complaints of malaise and anorexia she was hospitalized that day. While blood and urine culture tests were negative, meropenem (MEPM) was given since an anaerobic bacterial infection could not be ruled out. At this point, the possibility of pegfilgrastim-induced aortitis was considered more likely than infection, and the patient was observed without steroids. Acetaminophen was used as needed during admission. On day 21 (7 days after admission) her fever abated, and blood tests showed improvement on day 23 (WBC 5600/μL and CRP 1.95 mg/dL). A contrast-enhanced CT scan was performed again on day 26, and an improvement of the subclavian artery wall thickening was confirmed (Fig. 2B).

Fig. 2
figure 2

CT scan findings: the right subclavian artery. A Wall thickening and peri-aortic soft tissue infiltration of the right subclavian artery on day 11 after pegfilgrastim administration (orange arrowheads). These findings were improved on day 26 (B)

Following discharge from hospital, the patient remains afebrile and is currently on weekly paclitaxel without the use of G-CSF.

Conclusions

This report describes our experience with a case of aortitis localized to the subclavian artery where fever was exhibited 8 days after pegfilgrastim administration. The onset of this disease is known to usually occur within 2 weeks after the first administration of pegfilgrastim [3]. G-CSF-induced aortitis can occur in the thoracic to abdominal aorta and its branches, but the most frequent site is the aortic arch, reported to occur in approximately 70% of cases (11 of 16) [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. Aortitis localized to the subclavian artery is relatively rare.

When our case patient visited an emergency outpatient clinic, her blood test showed high neutrophil rate (93%), despite no infectious disease. In clinical practice, an increase in the WBC neutrophil rate is frequently observed after pegfilgrastim administration. However, to the best of our knowledge, there are no reports on changes in leukocyte fractions after pegfilgrastim administration, but only one old report on conventional G-CSF [13]. For reference, we retrospectively investigated changes in neutrophils after the first administration of pegfilgrastim. We examined patients who received dose-dense EC (E: epirubicin 90 mg/m2, C: cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2) as neo-adjuvant therapy during the December 2019 through March 2021 period (n = 21), this being the most common regimen for pegfilgrastim use. As shown in Table 1, the neutrophil rate did significantly increase over 2 weeks after the first administration of pegfilgrastim, as well as WBC, absolute count of neutrophils and CRP. Therefore, it is difficult to determine an existence of infection based on a differential white blood count, although the presence of a severe infection may reduce the neutrophil count.

Table 1 Changes in neutrophils after the first pegfilgrastim administration (n = 21)a,b

The treatment for drug-induced arteritis has not yet been established. As to the application of steroids, in cases such as this case where the vasculitis is localized and systemic symptoms are minimal, omission of steroid administration might be possible. However, it is clearly necessary to establish a treatment strategy for this disease by accumulating more cases.

If a patient develops a persistent high fever of unknown origin after pegfilgrastim administration, drug-induced aortitis should be considered during investigations for causes of fever. It is also crucial for clinicians to be aware of the timing and location of onset of this disease.