To the editor:

Ph-like ALL is a highly heterogenous disease genetically classified into JAK-STAT activated, ABL1 class rearranged and NOS subtypes [1, 2]. Ph-like ALL is considered to have a worse prognosis than other subtypes of B-ALL, with 5-year OS of only 24% under the treatment of chemotherapy [3, 4]. Some patients with Ph-like ALL lack effective targeted drugs or exhibit resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors [5, 6]. CAR-T therapy has been reported to overcome high-risk cytogenetics [7]. Whether introducing CART prior to allo-HSCT alters outcome of Ph-like ALL warrants investigation.

We screened 158 patients diagnosed with B-ALL who received CART therapy (anti-CD19 and tandem anti-CD19/CD22) from March, 2016 to January, 2021 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University. The diagnostic flow chart of Ph-like ALL was based on the literature [8] and is shown in Supplementary Fig. S1, Supplementary Tables S1, S2 and S3. Patient enrollment is shown in Supplementary Fig. S2. Finally, 17 Ph-like B-ALL, 23 Ph+ ALL and 51 other B-ALL patients were included (Supplementary Fig. S2). Clinical features of patients in the Ph-like group are shown in Table 1, Fig. 1a and Supplementary Table S4. Clinical data of Ph+ and B-ALL-others group are shown in Supplementary Tables S5 and S6, respectively. Patients in this study were from the NCT03275493 and NCT03614858 clinical trials. Structure of CAR Tcells (provided by Shanghai Unicar-Therapy Bio-Medicine Technology Co., Ltd, China) was described as reported [3, 9]. Measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity was defined as 0.01% by flow cytometry.

Table 1 Clinical and laboratory data of all Ph-like patients
Fig. 1
figure 1

a Treatment response of all Ph-like ALL patients. b OS of of Ph-like patients, which showed comparable OS of JAK-STAT activated and ABL1 class Ph-like ALL. c RFS of Ph-like patients, which showed comparable RFS of JAK-STAT activated and ABL1 class Ph-like ALL. d-f OS, RFS and CIR of all the patients, which showed comparable OS, RFS and CIR of Ph-like ALL with Ph+ALL and B-ALL-others

Abnormal karyotype were detected in only 3/17 (17.6%) of Ph-like ALL patients. Fifteen patients (15/17, 88.2%) showed abnormal FISH results, one showed negative FISH results and one didn’t have enough samples for FISH analysis. Targeted DNA next generation sequencing revealed mutations in 9 patients (52.9%). RNA-sequencing showed that 6 patients harbored ABL1 class rearrangements and 11 patients harbored JAK-STAT activated rearrangements. Five of the 6 ABL1 rearranged Ph-like ALL patients received dasatinib, 3 were sensitive and 2 were insensitive. Seven of the 11 patients with JAK-STAT activated rearrangements received ruxolitinib, but only 1 patient was sensitive. Eight patients received anti-CD19 CAR T-cells infusion, and 9 patients received anti-CD19/CD22 CAR T-cells infusion. Eleven patients underwent CAR-T therapy with active disease, 5 patients with positive MRD. A MRD negative patient underwent lobectomy for a fungal pulmonary infection and received CART as consolidation therapy during postoperative recovery. Complete remission (CR) was observed in 16/17 (94.1%) patients after CART. One patient in the JAK-STAT group didn’t respond to CART and underwent salvage allo-HSCT with active disease. Five patients received allo-HSCT at MRD+ CR and 11 patients received allo-HSCT at MRD- CR. Fifteen patients underwent allo-HSCT from haploidentical donors, two patients from a matched unrelated donor. MRD- CR was observed in all patients at the first bone marrow evaluation after allo-HSCT (Table 1). Five patients (5/17, 29.4%) relapsed after allo-HSCT, two of them had positive MRD and one didn’t achieve remission before CAR T-cells infusion. Four patients relapsed early after allo-HSCT (1.1, 8.2, 4.6, 7.5 months) and one patient relapsed at 19.7 months after allo-HSCT. Two patients died of disease relapse and 2 patients died of transplantation-related complications (Fig. 1a). Estimated 3-year OS in the JAK-STAT activated and ABL1 class group were 81.8%±11.6% and 83.3%±15.2%, respectively (P=0.68) (Fig. 1b). Estimated 3-year RFS in the JAK-STAT activated and ABL1 class group were 63.5%±16.9% and 55.6%±24.8%, respectively (P=0.78) (Fig. 1c).

The median age of patients in the Ph-like group, Ph+ group and B-ALL-others group were 21, 39 and 23 years old, respectively (P=0.001). The proportion of patients with active disease prior to CART therapy was 64.7% in the Ph-like group, 39.1% in the Ph+ group and 62.7% in the B-ALL-others patients (P=0.085). 16/17 (94.1%) patients in the Ph-like group responded to CAR-T therapy, including 11/17 (64.7%) MRD- CR, 5/17 (29.4%) MRD+ CR. 22/23 (95.6%) patients in the Ph+ group responded to CAR-T therapy, including 14/22 (60.9%) MRD- CR and 8/22 (34.8%) MRD+ CR. 50/51 (98.0%) patients responded to CAR-T therapy in the B-ALL-others, including 28/50 (54.9%) MRD- CR and 22/50 (43.1%) MRD+ CR (Supplementary Table S7). The estimated 3-year OS were 65.9%±16.5%, 59.7%±10.5% and 61.6%±7.3%, in the Ph-like, Ph+ and B-ALL-others group, respectively (P=0.758) (Fig. 1d). The estimated 3-year RFS were 59.8%±14.8%, 63.1%±10.5% and 56.3%±7.1%, in the Ph-like, Ph+ and B-ALL-others, respectively (P=0.764) (Fig. 1e). The estimated 3-year cumulative relapse rate was 7.8%±0.6%, 23.4%±0.9% and 29.0%±0.4% in the Ph-like, Ph+ and B-ALL-others, respectively (P=0.241) (Fig. 1f). There were no difference in the severity of all grade of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) between 3 groups (Supplementary Table S7).

Our results revealed a high (ORR: 94.3%) and deep (MRD- CR: 64.7%) response in Ph-like ALL patients to CAR-T therapy. Survival analysis showed that the strategy of CART and subsequent allo-HSCT overcame the negative impact of Ph-like characters compared to other high-risk B-ALL subtypes in this study [10]. Because of the limited Ph-like cases in this study, the benefits of this strategy warrant further investigation in a prospective controlled clinical trial.